Isn't it illegal for a school to withhold my academic transcript AFTER THEY SUED ME FOR "UNPAID TUITION" AND CASE WAS DISMISSED?
1. Plaintiff (a private university in California) sued me for "unpaid tuition."
2. My Demurrer was sustained without leave to amend (on grounds including that action was barred by statute of limitations).
3. Plaintiff filed Request for Dismissal with Prejudice, which was granted.
About 1 year later, my requests for copies of my official transcript are denied by university, insisting it will continue to do so "until [my] student account is paid."
What legal grounds or theory, if any, supports their current position? I understand withholding transcripts is a common practice. However, given my unique facts #2 & #3 above, isn't this illegal? I.e., wouldn't any other generic creditor be barred from relying on original claim to assert secondary rights attached to or rooted in the original?
