Is it negligence per se?

2 views 3 answers
Is public Health Law 2805(d) designed to protect patients? If clearly violated ,would it constitute a negligence per se? If yes,then can it be a good argument to proceed without an expert where clear evidence exists of unavoidable risks nondisclosure???Thanks.

Attorney Answers

3
Eric Rothstein ·
You are not going to be successful in a medical malpractice case without an expert.
0 upvotes
Steven Smollens ·
Dear New York Patient: The "lack" of your informed consent must be claimed as the proximate cause of the injury you suffered. The medical provider is allowed to rebut that claim. http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/PBH/28/2805-d
0 upvotes
Jon Friedman ·
You cannot prove that a doctor has failed to comply with the standard of care (included informed consent) without the testimony of another similarly situated professional. That is, a doctor. Sorry since I know I'm not telling you what you'd like to hear and perhaps a NY lawyer will step up and tell us I'm wrong but I really doubt it. Best wishes
0 upvotes