Has my MUSC psychiatrist violated SC statue SECTION 40-47-110 B-9 by using HIPAA exemption to accuse me falsely of drug abuse?
My MUSC psychiatrist contends I induced the torture of protracted withdrawal by consuming an average 50 milligrams Ambien a day. I have an IMBA from USC's International Business School in Financial Analysis. I ordered my pharmaceutical records from DHEC and my private records, signed by my only pharmacist. My analysis disproves his insane claim beyond a doubt. I understand it does not constitute defamation, because no one has pressed charges ( because they cannot). It does appear to violate SC statue SECTION 40-47-110 B-9 prohibiting "engaging in dishonorable, unethical, or unprofessional conduct that is likely either to deceive, defraud, or harm the public," under the "Misconduct" rules. This matter is one of numerous complaints included in a pending state medical examiner's board ethics complaint. I have fought this battle and requested evidence from MUSC for 18 months. The political odds are stacked against me, as 80% of the SCMERB either graduated or presently work for MUSC. Thank you for your feedback