What if someone who does not work for the government violates your 4th, 8th and 14th amendment rights?

The Constitution is a limitation on governmental conduct, not--with the exception of the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition of slavery--a limitation on private conduct. In some cases, however, both the government and private actors are involved in the action that is alleged to violate constiutional rights, and it is necessary for a court to determine whether the government's role in the conduct is sufficient to cause the Constitution to be implicated. Unlike state actors, private actors are generally not required to afford individuals the constitutional rights mentioned above. In nearly all U.S. states, private shopping center owners can eject protesters from their land for trespassing, and private associations can eject members or deny admission to applicants, with no warning and for no reason. But in a handful of states, notably California, state constitutional protections and certain common law rights have been extended to limit private actors. There are a number of situations where the United States Supreme Court has recognized the conduct of individuals or private organizations to be “state action,” and therefore subject to provisions of the Constitution such as Equal Protection, Due Process, or the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has held that: 1. Merely opening up a business to the public is not state action, but the performance of a “public function” (a function that has been traditionally and exclusively performed by the state) is state action (Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946)); 2. If an individual or organization merely enters into a contract or asserts a contractual right outside of court is it not state action, but if an individual or organization sues to judicially enforce a contractual right it is state action (Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948)); 3. If the government merely acquiesces in the performance of an act by a private individual or organization it is not state action, but if the government coerces, influences, or encourages the performance of the act it is state action (Rendall-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 (1982)); 4. If the government merely enters into a contract with an individual or organization for the goods or services then the actions of the private party are not state action, but if the government and the private party enter into a “joint enterprise” or a “symbiotic relationship” with each other it is state action (Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715 (1961)); 5. If government agencies are simply members of a private organization then the actions of the organization are not state action, but if the government is “pervasively entwined” with the leadership of the private organization then the acts of the organization are state action (Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, 535 U.S. 971 (2002)). You may have actions under the criminal statutes of Washington State or the US code, for such things as identity theft or whatever crimes are indicated by the particulars of your situation - such as deprivation of property may be theft / conversion, etc. If you believe it to be so, then please contact your local state or federal law enforcement agencies. You may have various civil actions (torts or whatnot) available to you against the various private actors - consult some personal injury or tort lawyers to discuss your options.