Last year I was sued by my landlord on breach of contract (back rent) I immediately served interrogatories, production of docs,

Bankruptcy and Debt 2 views 1 answers
R.F.A deemed admitted after court hearing. Deemed Admitted: Landlord, breached agreement from its inception; maintained inhabitable rental; violated our right to privacy; defendants (me) preformed all obligations under the rental agreement. I x-complained for breach or warranty of habitability, bodily injuries, genl. negligence, premises liability, concealment, fraud, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress. I took landlords default 08/2011. The court threw out his lawsuit, failure to provide me discovery after being ordered to do so. I am in pro per, may I propound request for admissions to use at my prove up hearing to prove financial claims? Joe Bay Area Ca.

Attorney Answer

1
Frank Chen ·
Do you already have a prove-up hearing date set (or reserved)? If so, you need to serve the Request for Admissions at least 35 days prior to the hearing date to be able to use the RFAs. But based upon this former landlord's prior conduct in failing to respond to discovery and failure to comply with a discovery order, you will probably not receive responses to the RFAs in time for any prove-up hearing. I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish with your RFAs. In California, most default judgments are proven up via declarations (Code of Civil Procedure section 585) with the following exceptions where a live prove up is required by law: -- In non-contract actions where the defendant(s) have not been served by publication, the court must hear evidence of Plaintiff’s damages. (CCP 585 (b).) -- In all actions where the service of the summons was by publication. (CCP 585 (c).) -- In quiet title actions and in cases where the defendant has been served by publication and is a non-California resident. (CCP 764.010; Winter v. Rice (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 679, 683; CCP 585 (c). However, a live prove-up hearing is sometimes an alternative method (which might be implemented if the plaintiff is representing himself or herself in pro per wherein the pro per plaintiff is likely to mess up on the procedural requirements).
0 upvotes

People Also Asked