Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1846

Levi v. Thompson

Alexander Levi v. John Thompson et al. The holder of a register’s certificate of the purchase of a lot in the town of Dubuque, lawfully acquired, and issued by the register under the two acts of 2d July, 1836, and 3d March, 1837, has such a

45 U.S. 17 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

United States v. King

The United States, Plaintiff in error, v. Richard King and Daniel W. Coxe, Defendants. The certificate of survey alleged to have been given by Trudeau, on the 14th of June, 1797, and brought forward to sustain a grant to the Marquis de Mai-

44 U.S. 773 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Lessee of Hickey v. Stewart

Lessee of Philip Hickey et al., Plaintiff in error, v. James A. Stewart et al. A defendant .in ejectment cannot protect himself by setting up the record in a prior chancery suit between the same parties7by which the plaintiff in the ejectmé

44 U.S. 750 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Lessee of Clymer v. Dawkins

Lessee of George Clymer et al., Plaintiff in error, v. George Dawkins et al., Defendants in error. A court is not bound to give (instructions to the jury in the terms required by either party; it is sufficient if so much thereof are giren a

44 U.S. 674 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Lessee of Brown v. Clements

Lessee of William L. Brown and Wife, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph Clements and Jonathan Hunt, Defendants in error. ' Under the acts of Congress, providing for the subdivision of the public lands, and the instructions of the secretary of th

44 U.S. 650 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Chaires ex rel. Chaires v. United States

Joseph Chaires, executor of Benjamin Chaires, deceased, and Peter Miranda and Gad Humphreys, appellants, v. The United States. Where this court has affirmed the title to lands in Florida, and referred, in its decree, to a particular survey,

44 U.S. 611 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Lane v. Vick

John Lane and Sarah C. Lane, wife of the said John, and Elizabeth Irion, an infant under twenty-one years, who sues by John Lane her next friend, Complainants and Appellants, v. John W. Vick, Sargeant S. Prentiss et al., Defendants. Newit V

44 U.S. 464 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Carroll v. Safford

Charles H. Carroll, Complainant, v. Orrin Safford, Treasurer of the county of Genesee, in the state of Michigan, Defendant. When the purchaser , of land from the United States has paid for it, and received a final certificate) it is taxable

44 U.S. 441 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

Croghan v. Nelson

Lessee of Angelica Croghan et al., Plaintiff, v. John Nelson, Defendant. In making an entry of land, where mistakes occur which are occasioned by the impracticability of ascertaining the relative positions of the objects-called for, the cou

44 U.S. 187 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property · New York 1845

United States v. Gear

The United States, Plaintiff, v. Hezekiah H. Gear, Defendant. The United States, Complainant, v. Hezekiah H. Gear, Defendant. The act of Congress .entitled “ An act to create additional land districts in the ._ states of Illinois- and Misso

44 U.S. 120 New York Supreme Court Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1844

Pollard's Lessee v. Files

Lessee of John Pollard, William Pollard, John Fowler and Harriet his wife, Henry P. Ensign and Phebe his wife, George Huggins and Louisa his wife, Joseph Case and Eliza his wife, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph F. Files, Defendant. Tt is the

43 U.S. 591 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1844

Ladiga v. De Marcus Roland

Sally Ladiga, Plaintiff in error, v. Ricard De Marcus Roland, and Peter Hiefner, Defendants. By a treaty made between the United States and the Creek tribe of Indians, east of the Mississippi river, on the 24th of March, 1832, it was stipul

43 U.S. 581 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1844

Burwell v. Cawood

Nathaniel Burwell, Complainant and Appellant, v. Daniel Cawood, William C. Gardner, Executor of Joseph Mandeville, deceased, and John West, Defendants. Although by the general rule of law, every partnership is dissolved by the death of one

43 U.S. 560 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1844

Grignon's Lessee v. Astor

Lessee of Robert Grignon, Peter R. Grignon, and Morgan L. Martin, Plaintiffs in error, v. John J. Astor, Ramsay Crooks, Robert Stuart, and Linns Thompson. By a law of Michigan, passed in 1818, the County Courts had power, under certain circ

43 U.S. 319 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1844

Vidal v. Mayor of Philadelphia

Francois Fenelon Vidal, John F. Girard, and others, Citizens and subjects of the monarchy of France, and Henry Stump, Complainants and Appellants, v. The Mayor, Aldermen, and Citizens of Philadelphia, the executors of Stephen Girard, and ot

43 U.S. 127 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1844

Kinney v. Clark

William Kinney and James J. Mechie, Executors and Trustees of Robert Porterfield, deceased, v. Meriwether L. Clark, William P. Clark, George R. H. Clark, and Jefferson R. Clark, a minor by the aforesaid George R. H. Clark his Guardian, heir

43 U.S. 76 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1843

McClurg v. Kingsland

William T. McClurg, John C. Parry, and Enoch J. Higby, Partners, doing business under the firm of McClurg, Parry, and Higby, Assignees of James Harley, Plaintiffs in error, v. Lawrence Kingsland, Isaac Lightner and James Cuddy, Partners, do

42 U.S. 202 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1842

Prigg v. Pennsylvania

Edward Prigg, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Defendant in Error. A writ of error to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, brought under .the tyventyfifth section of the judiciary act of 118?, to revise the judgment of

41 U.S. 539 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1842

Carver v. Hyde

Eleazer Carver, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph A. Hyde and others, Defendants in error. Action for damages for a violation of a patent for an improvement on the cotton gin. The charge of the Circuit Court of Massachusetts upon the facts in t

41 U.S. 513 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1842

Dobbins v. Commissioners of Erie County

Daniel Dobbins, Plaintiff in error, v. The Commissioners of Erie County, Defendants in error. A captain of the United States revenue cutter, on the f¡rie station in Pennsylvania, was rated and assessed for county taxes, as an officer of the

41 U.S. 435 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1842

Martin v. Lessee of Waddell

Merrit Martin and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Lessee of William C. H. Waddell, Defendant in error. Ejectment for one hundred acres of land, covered with' water, .in Raritan bay, in the township of Perth Amboy, in the state of New Je

41 U.S. 367 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1842

Prouty v. Ruggles

David Prouty and John Mears, Plaintiffs in error, v. Draper Ruggles et al., Defendants in error. The plaintiffs, in the Circuit Court, claimed damages for the'infringement of their patent for “a new and useful improvement in the constructio

41 U.S. 336 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1842

Mayor of Mobile v. Eslava

The Mayor and Aldermen of The City of Mobile, Plaintiffs error, v. Miguel D. Eslava, Defendant in error. A lot. of ground, part of the ground on which-Fort Charlotte had been erected, in the city' of Mobile, before the territory was acquire

41 U.S. 234 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1842

United States v. Breward

The United States, Appellant, v. John Breward, Appellee. Florida land claim. Breward petitioned the Governor of East Florida, intending to establish a saw-mill to saw lumber on St. John’s river, for a grant of five miles square of land, or

41 U.S. 143 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion