Find court opinions that match your case.

Remanded Intellectual Property 1831

Lewis v. Marshall

*Josiah Lewis, Frances Lewis and William Rawle, Executors and Executrix of William Lewis, deceased, and the said Josiah Lewis, Margaret and Louisa Agaid, and Lewis H. Conover, heirs, &c., of said Lewis, and Richard Willing, Eliza M. Willing

30 U.S. 470 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1831

Hawkins v. Barney s Lessee

*John Hawkins and William May, Plaintiffs in error, v. Joshua Barney s Lessee, Defendant in error. Constitutional law. — Statutes of limitation. — Evidence m ejectment. The decision of this court, as to the validity of the law of Kentucky,

30 U.S. 457 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1831

Hinde v. Lessee of Vattier

*Thomas Hinde and wife, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Lessee of Charles Vattier. Evidence. — Public documents. — State decisions. The book called the Land Laws of Ohio, published by the authority of a law of that state, is evidence in the cir

30 U.S. 398 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1831

Lessee of Clarke v. Courtney

*The Lessee of James B. Clarke and others, Plaintiff in error, v. John Courtney and others, Defendants in error. Proof of deed. — Power of attorney. — Adverse possession. The clerk of the court brought into court, under process, a letter of

30 U.S. 319 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1831

Lessee of Fisher v. Cockerell

*Lessee of John Fisher, Plaintiff in error, v. William Cockerell, Defendant in error. Constitutional law. — Error to state court. — Record. After a judgment for the plaintiff in ejectment, in the Union county circuit court of the state of K

30 U.S. 248 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1831

Doe ex dem. Patterson v. Winn

*Doe ex dem, William Patterson, Plaintiff in error, v. Elisha Winn and others, Defendants in error. Evidence. — Exemplification of grant. An exemplification of a grant of land, under the great seal of the state of Georgia, is, per se, evide

30 U.S. 233 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1831

Lessee of Scott v. Ratliffe

*The Lessee of Robert G. Scott and Susannah his wife, and James C. Madison, Plaintiffs in error, v. Silas Ratliffe, Thomas Owings, John Owings and others, Defendants in error. Hearsay evidence. — Land-law of Kentuchy. A witness testified, t

30 U.S. 81 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1830

Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of Pawlet

The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts Plaintiffs vs. The Town of Pawlet and Ozias Clarke. Ejectment to recove! a lot of land, being the first division lot laid out to the right of the society in the town of Pawlet.

29 U.S. 480 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1830

Hollingsworth v. Barbour

Henry Hollingsworth, Heir of Levi Hollingsworth, Appellant vs. Philip Barbour and others, Appellees. H.- entered, with the proper surveyor for the'district of Kentucky,"-forty-five . thousand acres of land, in the county of Washington in th

29 U.S. 466 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1830

Galt v. Galloway

William T. Galt and others, Appellants vs. James Galloway, Jun. and Others, Appellees. The possession of a warrant has always .been considered at the land office in Ohio sufficient authority to make locations under it. Letters of attorney w

29 U.S. 332 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1830

Smith v. Honey

John Smith T. vs. John W. Honey. Where the verdict for the plaintiff in the circuit court is for a less amount than two thousand dollars, and the defendant prosecutes a writ of error, this court has not jurisdiction; although the demand of

28 U.S. 469 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1830

Stringer v. Lessee of Young

Daniel Stringer, Philip M. Linger, Nicholas, Margaret and Joseph Linger, Plaintiffs in Error vs. The Lessee of John Young, Archibald M’Call, Mary Cadwallader, William Reed and Anne his wife, and Harriet M’Call. On a trial in- ejectment, the

28 U.S. 320 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1830

Jackson v. Lamphire

James Jackson, on the demise of Harman V. Hart, Plaintiff in Error vs. Elias Lamphire, Defendant in Error. This court has no authority, on a writ of error from a state court, to declare a state law void on account of its collision with a st

28 U.S. 280 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1829

Reynolds v. M'Arthur

John Reynolds, Tenant the United States, Plaintiff vs. Duncan M’Arthur, Defendant. rhe lands north west of the river Ohio, between the- rivers Scioto and Little Miami, lying west of Ludlow's tine, east of Roberts’s line and south of the Ind

27 U.S. 417 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1829

Satterlee v. Matthewson

John F. Satterlee, Plaintiff in error vs. Elizabeth Matthewson, Defendant in error. S. and M. held land jn Luzerne county, Pennsylvania, in common, under a Connecticut title. A division of the land was-made between them, and-S. became the t

27 U.S. 380 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1829

Foster v. Neilson

James Foster and Pleasants Elam, Plaintiffs in error vs. David Neilson, Defendant in error. By the treaty of St Ildefonso, made bn the 1st of October 1800, Spain ceded Louisiana to Prance; and' France,'by the treaty of. Paris, signed the 80

27 U.S. 253 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1829

Hunt v. Wickliffe

David Hunt and others, appellants vs. Robert Wickliffe, appellee. An entry .was made' in the land office of Kentucky, of one-thousand acres, in the name of “John Floyd’S heirs,” without naming the persons who. were the heirs: Upon an object

27 U.S. 201 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1828

Ross v. Doe on the Demise of Barland

Allison Ross, Plaintiff in Error, vs. John Doe on the demise of Adam Barland, and others. Both the plaintiff and defendants claimed title under the provisions of the Act of Congress, passed 3d March, 1803, entitled “ An Act regulating the g

26 U.S. 655 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1828

Jackson v. Clark

James Jackson, Ex-demise of Lazy Anderson vs. John Clark and Robert Ellison. Construction of the Act of Congress passed March 2d 1807, entitled i“ An Act to exteffd the time, for locating Virginia military warrants, for returning surveys th

26 U.S. 628 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1828

Steele's Lessee v. Spencer

Robert Steele’s Lessee, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Jesse Spencer And Others, Defendants in Error. ■A decree of the Supreme Court of Ohio ordered that the patentee of a certain tract of land, should, within six months, make a deed, &c. withcove

26 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1828

Davis v. Mason

John Davis and Others, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Richard B. Mason, Lessee. In an action of ejectment to recover land in Kentucky, the law of real estate in Kentucky, is the law of this Court, in deciding the rights of the parties., {505} , I

26 U.S. 503 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1828

Elliott v. Lessee of Peirsol

James Elliott the younger, Benjamin Elliott, Anderson Taylor, Reuben Pater, Patsey Elliott, and Wilford Lepell, vs. The Lessee of William Peirsol, Lydia Peirsol, Ann North, Jane North, Sophia North, Elizabeth F. P. North, and William North,

26 U.S. 328 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1828

Konig v. Bayard

William Konig, who is an Alien, Plaintiff below, vs. William Bayard, William Bayard, jr. Robert Bayard, and Jacob Le Roy, Citizens of the State of New-York. a-stranger to the c! Aver and endorser of a non-accepted bill of exchange, .may int

26 U.S. 250 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1828

Old Grant v. M'Kee ex rel. Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky

Old Grant, on the demise of Samuel Meredith, Plaintiff in Error, vs. John M’Kee, for the use of the Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Court will, not take’jurisdiction of a case, where, although the whole property'claimed by the les

26 U.S. 248 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion