Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1841

United States v. Fitzgerald

The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. John Fitzgerald and Hipolite Fitzgerald, Defendants in error. John Fitzgerald had been appointed, in 1833, Inspector of the CuBtdms for the District of Mississippi; and by the Collector at New Orle

40 U.S. 407 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1841

Rhode Island v. Massachusetts

The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants, v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts The state of Rhode Island filed a bill against , the commonwealth of Massachusetts, claiming that the houndary . between the two states

40 U.S. 233 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1840

Decatur v. Paulding

Susan Decatur, Plaintiff in error, vs. James K. Paulding, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant in error. On the 3d of March, 1837, Congress passed an act giving to the widow of apy 'officer who had died in the naval service of the United States

39 U.S. 497 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1840

Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. Stimpson

The Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad Company, Plaintiffs in error, vs. James Stimpson, Defendant in error. Action for the violation of a patent right, granted to the patentee for “ a new and useful improvement in turning short curves on ra

39 U.S. 448 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1840

Lessee of Pollard's heirs v. Kibbe

Lessee of William Pollard's heirs, &c., Plaintiffs in error, vs. Gaius Kibbe, Defendant in error. Action of ejectment in the state Court of Alabama, for a tot of ground in the city of Mobile. The plaintiff claimed the title to the lot under

39 U.S. 353 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1840

Games v. Stiles ex dem. Dunn

John F. Games and Nathan Gilbert, Plaintiffs in error, vs. John Stiles, ex dem. of Walter Dunn, deceased, Defendant in error. A deed was executed in Glasgow, Scotland, by which land in Ohio, which had bqen patented tp David Buchanan by. the

39 U.S. 322 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1840

Rhode Island v. Massachusetts

The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainant, vs. The State of Massachusetts, Defendant. By a rule of the Supreme Court, the practice of the English Courts of Chancery is the practice in the Courts of Equity of the Unit

39 U.S. 210 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1840

Runyan v. Lessee of Coster

George Runyan, Plaintiff in error, vs. The Lessee of John G. Coster and Thomas K. Mercien, who survived John Hone, Defendant in error. The legislature of the state of New York, on the 18th of April, 1823, incorporated “The New York and Schu

39 U.S. 122 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1839

Wilcox v. Jackson

De la Fayette Wilcox, Plaintiff in error, vs. John Jackson, on the demise of Murray M'Connel, Defendant in error. Ejectment for' a tract of land in Cook county, Illinois, being a fractional section, embracing the military post called Fort'D

38 U.S. 498 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1839

Bagnell v. Broderick

Carey Bagnell and the Executors of Morgan Byrne, Plaintiffs in error, vs. George W. Broderick, Defendant in error. The plaintiff in error had exhibited, in an action instituted against him in thé Circuit Court of Missouri, evidence conducin

38 U.S. 436 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1839

Ex parte Hennen

Ex parte, in the matter of Duncan N. Hennen. Mandamus. Motion'for .a rule on the district judge of the eastern district of Louisiana, . to show cause why a mandamus should not be issued requiring him to restore Duncan N. Hennen to the offic

38 U.S. 230 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1839

Clark v. Smith

Meriwether L. Clark, Executor, and William P. Clark, George R. H. Clark, and Jefferson Kennerly Clark, an Infant under the age of twenty-one years, by his Guardian ad litem and next Friend, the said George R. H. Clark, Heirs at Law of Willi

38 U.S. 195 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1839

Lessee of Reed v. Marsh

Lessee of Samuel Reed, Plaintiff in error, vs. William Marsh, Defendant in error. The certificate of the clerk of the Court, that a motion was made for a new trial, and reasons and certain papers filed on which the motion was founded, which

38 U.S. 153 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1839

United States v. Heirs of Arredondo

The United States, Appellant, vs. The heirs of F. M. Arredondo, and others, Appellees. A concession of thirty-eight thousatid acres of land was made in 1817, by the governor of East Florida, to F. M. Arredondo, in consideration of services

38 U.S. 133 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1839

Bradley v. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co.

William A. Bradley, Plaintiff in error, vs. The Washington, Alexandria, and Georgetown Steam Packet Company, Defendants in error. The plaintiff in error had, by an agreement in writing, hired a steamboat to be put “on the route” from Washin

38 U.S. 89 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1838

Rhode Island v. Massachusetts

The State of Rhode Island Providence Plantations, complainants v. the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, defendant. -The Supreme Court has jurisdiction of a hill filed by the state of Rhode Island ,. against the state of Massachusetts, tp ascer

37 U.S. 657 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1838

Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes

Amos Kendall, postmaster general of the United States, plaintiff in error v. The United States, on the relation of William B. Stokes et al. Contracts for carrying the mail of the United States, were made by S. & S., with the postmaster gene

37 U.S. 524 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1838

Strother v. Lucas

Daniel F. Strother, plaintiff in error v. John B. C. Lucas, defendant. Ejectment for two lots of ground in St. Louis, Missouri. The plaintiff jiad brought an ejectment, which was before the Court on a writ of error, in 1832, and the judgmen

37 U.S. 410 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1838

Hepburn v. Dubois

Andrew D. Hepburn, plaintiff in error v. Jacob Dubois, lessee of Oliver S. Wolcott. The deed of a feme covert, conveying her interest' in lands which she owns in fee, does not pass her interest, by the force of its execution and delivery, a

37 U.S. 345 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1838

Swayze v. Burke

Lessee of Gabriel Swayze, and Mary his wife, plaintiffs in error v. Robert Burke, D. Sherman, George Jackson, and James Hinsman, defendants Ejectment. ' John Ormsby died in Alleghany county,-Pennsylvania, in December, 3,805, having a son Ol

37 U.S. 11 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1837

Poole v. Lessee of Fleeger

Burgess Poole and others, plaintiffs in error v. The Lessee of John Fleeger and others. The plaintiffs in the circuit court of West Tennessee, instituted an ejectment for a tract of land held under a Virginia military land warrant, situate

36 U.S. 185 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1837

Mayor of New York v. Miln

The Mayor, Aldermen, and Commonalty of the City of New York, plaintiffs v. George Miln. In February, 1824, the legislature of New York passed “an act concerning passengers in vessels arriving in the port of New York.” By one of the provisio

36 U.S. 102 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1837

Lessee of Ewing v. Burnet

Lessee of James H. Ewing, plaintiff in error v. Jacob Burnet. Ejectment. Ohio. It is the exclusive province of the jury to decide what facts are proved by competent evidence. It is their province to judge of the weight of testimony as tendi

36 U.S. 41 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1837

Lessee of Marlatt v. Silk

Lessee of Joseph Marlatt, plaintiff in error, v. John Silk, and John M‘Donald. Ejectment. A tract of land situated in that part of the state of Pennsylvania, which, by the compact with the state of Virginia, of 1780, was acknowledged to be

36 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion