Find court opinions that match your case.

Remanded Intellectual Property 1836

Mayor of New Orleans v. United States

The Mayor, Aldermen and Inhabitants of New Orleans, appellants v. The United States. Tue United States alleged, by a petition presented to the district court of the United States for the district of Louisiana, that by the treaty of cession

35 U.S. 662 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1836

Ellicott v. Pearl

Thomas Ellicott and Jonathan Meredith, plaintiffs in error v. William Pearl. At the trial of a writ of right, in the circuit court of Kentucky, a witness was offered to prove that one Moore, who was dead, and whose name was put down as one

35 U.S. 412 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1836

Smith v. United States

John Smith, T., appellant v. The United States. John Smith, T. claimed a confirmation of a grant of land by the governor-general of JLoi^isiana, made on the 11th of February 1790. Louisiana was ceded by France to the United States by the tr

35 U.S. 326 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1836

Boone v. Chiles

Sarah Boone and others, appellants v. William Chiles and others, appellees. 'The complainants filed a bill in the circuit court of Kentucky, claiming a conveyance of the legal title, and a.n account of rents and profits of a tract of land,

35 U.S. 177 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1836

Dubois v. Hepburn

John Dubois, lessee of Oliver S. Wolcott, plaintiff in error v. Andrew D. Hepburn. Construction of the fourth section of the act of assembly of Pennsylvania, passed 15th March 1815, providing for the sale of lands for taxes. The law of Penn

35 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

Mitchel v. United States

Colin Mitchel, Robert Mitchel, in his own right, and as assignee of the estate and effects of the mercantile house heretofore trading under, the firm of Carnochan and Mitchel, and as trustee of the creditors of said firm, and also of Richar

34 U.S. 711 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

Winn v. Patterson

Elisha Winn and others, plaintiffs in error v. William Patterson. Georgia. Ejectment for a tract of land in Franklin county, Georgia, held • under a.grant to Basil Jones, and conveyed by the attorney of Basil Jones to the. defendant in erro

34 U.S. 663 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

Beard v. Rowan

Henry Beard, William A. Beard, Lewis Hawkins and Mary his wife v. John Rowan. Kentucky. The clauses in the will of John Campbell, under-which the land in controversy was claimed, were as follows : “ and if within that time, my said half bro

34 U.S. 301 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

Mayor of New Orleans v. De Armas

The Mayor, Aldermen, and Inhabitants of the City of New Orleans, plaintiffs in error v. Christoval G. De Armas, and Manuel Simon Cucullu. Louisiana. A lot of ground situated in the city of New Orleans, which was ■ occupied, under an incompl

34 U.S. 224 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

United States v. Clarke

The United States, appellants v. George J. F. Clarke. The decree of the supreme court of East Florida, confirming a concession of land to the appellee, granted to him by governor Coppinger, in December 1817, confirmed.. A concession on cond

34 U.S. 168 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

Caldwell v. Carrington's Heirs

William Caldwell, Isaac Caldwell and Samuel Brents, Appellants v. Sarah and George Carrington's Heirs. A bill was filed in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky, claiming certain lands in Kentucky, under an agr

34 U.S. 86 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1835

Coulson v. Walton

John Coulson, appellant v. James Walton and others. Tennessee. A bond was executed in 1787’by which ihe obligor bound himself to pay 100 pounds for a horse, or to make' over to the obligee his interest in a certain entry and warrant of land

34 U.S. 62 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1833

Sampeyreac v. United States

Bernardo Sampeyreac and Joseph Stewart, appellants v. The United States, appellees. Construction of the act of congress passed the 5th of May 1830, entitled “ an act for the further extending the powers of the judges of the superior court o

32 U.S. 222 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1833

Holmes v. Trout

John Holmes, Michael Omealy, Richard Caton, Hugh Thompson, and William Slater, appellants v. Daniel Trout, William Moreland, Walter Moreland, Jeremiah Trout, Jacob Overpeck, and William Buchannan, appellees. Questions on the validity of cer

32 U.S. 171 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1832

Wallace v. Parker

Cadwallader Wallace, Plaintiff in Error v. Josiah C. Parker, Defendant in Error. Jurisdiction. This court has jurisdiction in an appeal from he supreme court of the state of Ohio, in a case where was drawn in question at the trial the const

31 U.S. 680 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1832

Lindsey v. Lessee of Miller

Stephen Lindsey and others, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Lessee of Thomas B. Miller, Defendant in Error. Ejectment. The plaintiff claimed the land in controversy, which was situated . in the Virginia military district, in the state of Ohio, u

31 U.S. 666 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1832

Crane v. Lessee of Morris

Nathaniel Crane, Plaintiff in Error v. The Lessee of Henry Gage Morris et al. and of John Jacob Astor et al. Defendant in Error. Upon a deliberate review of the questions of law discussed and decided in the case of Carver v. Jackson ex dem.

31 U.S. 598 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1832

United States v. Nourse

The United States, Appellant v. Joseph Nourse, Complainant. The agent of the treasury of the United States, under the provisions of the. act of congress passed on the 15th of May 1820, entitled “ an act for the better organization of the tr

31 U.S. 470 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1832

President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of White

The President, Recorder and Trustees of the City of Cincinnati, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Lessee of Edward White, Defendant in Error. The equitable owners of a tract of land on the river Ohio (the legal title to which was granted to John C

31 U.S. 431 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1832

Boardman v. Lessees of M'Call

Daniel Boardman and others, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M’Call and others, Defendants in Error. In an ejectment a witness wassailed to prove that'a person who was dead had; at a former trial between the plaintiffs a

31 U.S. 328 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1832

James Greenleaf's Lessee v. Birth

James Greenleaf’s Lessee, Plaintiff in Error v. James Birth, Defendant in Error. Ejectment. A deed of indenture, duly executed, acknowledged and recorded, was given in evidence by the defendant in an ejectment, which purported to' convey ce

31 U.S. 302 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1832

Ross v. M'Lung

David Ross, Plaintiff in Error v. Charles M’Lung, Defendant in Error. Construction of the act of the legislature of North Carolina, concerning the registration of deeds, passed in 1715.' The questions which grów out of the language of this

31 U.S. 283 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1832

Grant v. Raymond

Joseph Grant and others v. E. and H. Raymond. Action for damages for an infringement of a patent rignt, granted to the plaintiff in 1825. The patent recited that a former patent had been issued in 1821, to the same person, for the same impr

31 U.S. 218 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1832

Lessee of Sicard v. Davis

Lessee of Stephen Sicard et al. Plaintiffs in Error v. Nancy Davis et al. Defendants in Error. Same v. John Cecil and Robert Smithers. The act of the legislature of Kentucky, passed in 1796, respecting conveyances, reduces into one all the

31 U.S. 124 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion