Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Elsner
In re Wilhelm ELSNER. In re Keith W. Zary. Nos. 03-1569, 03-1585. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Aug. 16, 2004. Julie W. Meder, Webb Ziesenheim Logsdon Orkin & Hanson, P.C., of Pittsburgh, PA, argued for appellant
In re Wallace
In re David WALLACE, Hartmut Engelmann, Dan Aderka, Daniela Novick and Menachem Rubinstein. No. 03-1327. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Aug. 11, 2004. Roger L. Browdy, Browdy and Nei-mark, P.L.L.C., of Washington,
In re Chatam International Inc.
In re CHATAM INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED. No. 03-1504. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Aug. 3, 2004. Paul M. Lewis, Charles Jacquin et Cie., Inc., of Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. James R. Hughes, Associat
Humanoids Group v. Rogan
HUMANOIDS GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. ROGAN, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee. No. 03-1896. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: June 2, 2004. Decided: July 20, 200
In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP
In re OPPEDAHL & LARSON LLP. Nos. 03-1525, 78/061,755. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 25, 2004. Carl Oppedahl, Oppedahl & Larson LLP, of Dillon, CO, argued for appellant. Cynthia C. Lynch, Associate Solicitor, United
Jacobs v. Nintendo of America, Inc.
Jordan Spencer JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 03-1297. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: May 28, 2004. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 7, 2004. John Edw
In re American Academy of Science Tech Center
In re AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE TECH CENTER. No. 03-1531. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 13, 2004. John M. Collins, Hovey Williams LLP, of Kansas City, MO, argued for appellant. C. Edward Polk, Jr., Associate Solicit
In re Ngai
In re John NGAI and David Lin. No. 03-1524. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 13, 2004. Richard Aron Osman, Science & Technology Law Group, of Hillsborough, CA, for appellants. John M. Whealan, Solicitor, United States Pa
United States v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less, Bearing A Registered Trademark of Guess?, Inc.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, Able Time, Inc., Claimant-Appellee, v. 2,164 WATCHES, MORE OR LESS, BEARING A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GUESS?, INC.; 2,794 Watches, More or Less, Bearing a Registered Trademark of Tommy Hilfiger
Goldstein v. Moatz
Richard W. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry I. MOATZ, Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline; Lawrence Anderson; James E. Rogan, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USP-TO; James A. Toupi
Dynacore Holdings Corp. v. U.S. Philips Corp.
DYNACORE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and Dynacore Patent Litigation Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, and STMicroelectronics, Inc., and Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, and JVC Americas Corp., and Compaq Compute
Arnold Partnership v. Dudas
The ARNOLD PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon DUDAS, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director, Patent and Trademark Office, and Nicholas P. Godici, Commissioner for Patents, Defendants-Appellees
Invention Submission Corp. v. Rogan
INVENTION SUBMISSION CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. ROGAN, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce
In re Watts
In re Lavaughn F. WATTS, Jr. Nos. 03-1121, 08/568, 08-904. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 15, 2004. As Corrected Jan. 15, 2004. Ronald 0. Neerings, Texas Instruments Incorporated, of Dallas, TX, argued for appellant L
In re Curtis
In re John P. CURTIS, James H. Kemp, and Jan-Joost Pabst. No. 03-1215. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 6, 2004. James Galbraith, Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York, NY, argued for appellant. On the brief were Patrick J. Bird
Talbert Fuel Systems Patents Co. v. Unocal Corp.
TALBERT FUEL SYSTEMS PATENTS CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Union Oil Company of California, Defendants-Appellees, and Tosco Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-1421. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oc
Bonneville International Corp. v. Peters
BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; Cox Radio, Inc.; Emmis Communications Corporation; Entercom Communications Corp.; Infinity Broadcasting Corporation; Susquehana Radio Corp.; National Association of Broadcasters; Clear Channel Communica
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
FESTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHOKETSU KINZOKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI CO., LTD., a/k/a SMC Corporation, and SMC Pneumatics, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-1066. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 26, 2003. Rehe
In re Coors Brewing Co.
In re COORS BREWING COMPANY. No. 03-1050. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Sept. 8, 2003. Sabrina C. Stavish, Sheridan Ross, P.C., of Denver, Colorado, argued for appellant. With her on the brief was Miriam D. Tru-d
In re MBNA America Bank, N.A.
In re MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A. Nos. 02-1558, 74/472, 74/417, 74/908, 74/538. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 15, 2003. Michael A. Grow, Arent, Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. W
In re Pacer Technology
In re PACER TECHNOLOGY. No. 02-1602. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Aug. 4, 2003. Thomas E. Schatzel, Law Offices of Thomas E. Schatzel, of Los Gatos, CA, argued for appellant. Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicitor
Intellectual Property Development, Inc. v. UA-Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC. and COmmunications Patents, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UA-COLUMBIA CABLEVISION OF WESTCHESTER, INC. and Telecommunications, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-1248. United States Court of Appeals
In re Les Halles De Paris J.V.
In re LES HALLES DE PARIS J.V. No. 02-1539. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 11, 2003. Myron Cohen, Cohen, Pontani, Lieberman & Pavane, of New York, NY, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Lance J. Lieberma
In re Boulevard Entertainment, Inc.
In re The BOULEVARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. No. 02-1585. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 9, 2003. David Gurnick, Arter & Hadden LLP, of Woodland Hills, CA, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Tal S. Grinblat. J
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.