Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Berman v. Housey
Phillip W. BERMAN, Timothy J. Gregory, Laurence A. Lasky, Gerald R. Nakamura, Eric J. Patzer, John S. Patton, and Ellen S. Vitetta, Appellants, v. Gerard M. HOUSEY, Appellee. No. 01-1311. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
FESTO CORP. v. SHOKETSU KINZOKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI CO., LTD., et al. No. 00-1548. Argued January 8, 2002 — Decided May 28, 2002 Robert H. Bork argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Charles R. Hoffmann, Gerald T. Bodner,
In re Kollar
In re John KOLLAR. Nos. 01-1640. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 11, 2002. John Kollar, of Wyckoff, NJ, pro se. John M. Whealan, Solicitor, of Arlington, VA, representing the Director of the United States Patent and T
In re Glaug
In re Frank S. GLAUG, and Margaret A. Kato. Nos. 00-1571, 08/455,374. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: March 15, 2002. Meredith Martin Addy, Brinks, Hofer Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. With
In re Berger
In re Kenneth L. BERGER. No. 01-1129. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Jan. 29, 2002. Edward S. Irons, of Washington, DC, for appellant. John M. Whealan, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, Patent and Trademark Offi
In re Sang-Su Lee
In re SANG-SU LEE. No. 00-1158. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 18, 2002. Richard H. Stern, of Washington, DC, argued for Sang Su Lee. With him on the brief was Robert E. Bushnell. Sidney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Sol
Talbert Fuel Systems Patents Co. v. Unocal Corp.
TALBERT FUEL SYSTEMS PATENTS CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Union Oil Company of California, Defendants-Appellees, and Tosco Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-1421. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Ja
Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
SATELLITE BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America, Respondents, Association of America’s Public Television Stations; Public Broadcasting Service; Corporation fo
Sallen v. Corinthians Licenciamentos LTDA
Jay D. SALLEN d/b/a J.D.S. Enterprises, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CORINTHIANS LICENCIAMENTOS LTDA and Desportos Licenciamentos LTDA, Defendants, Appellees. No. 01-1197. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard Oct. 4, 2001. Decid
Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg Co.
DETHMERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AUTOMATIC EQUIPMENT MFG CO., Defendant-Cross Appellant. Nos. 00-1114, 00-1130. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 5, 2001. David A. Tank, Davis, Brown, Koehn,
Exxon Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
EXXON CORPORATION (now Exxon Mobil Corporation) and Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, Defendant-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 00-1173, 00-1174. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECID
In re Zurko
In re Mary E. ZURKO, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. Lipner. Nos. 96-1258, 07/479,666. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
In re Save Venice New York, Inc.
In re SAVE VENICE NEW YORK, INC. Nos. 00-1450, 75/222,218. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 27, 2001. Kimberly J. McGraw, Baker Botts, L.L.P., of New York, NY, argued for appellant. With her on the brief was Bradley B.
Dow Chemical Co. v. Sumitomo Chemical Co.
The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUMITOMO CHEMICAL COMPANY, LTD. and Sumitomo Chemical America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-1441. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Decided July 25, 2001. Corrected July
In re Roemer
In re ROEMER. No. 00-1159. United States .Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: July 24, 2001. Boris Haskell, Paris and Haskell, of Arlington, VA, argued for appellants. William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, U
Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corp.
SOUTHCO, INC., v. KANEBRIDGE CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 00-1102. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued Sept. 13, 2000. July 20, 2001. Steven B. Pokotilow (Argued), Ian G. Dibernardo, Kiersten M. Skog, Stroock, Stroock & Lav
In re Haruna
In re Tsutomu HARUNA and Sado Kita (Serial No. 29/058,031). No. 00-1283. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: April 18, 2001. Andrew J. Patch, Young & Thompson, of Arlington, VA, argued for appellants. Joseph G. Piccolo
Zachariah v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks
No. 00-1394. Zachariah v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks et al.
Doughtie v. Johnson
No. 00M76. No. 00M77. No. 00M79. Doughtie v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Chung v. Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences; and Weber v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Correctio
Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
TRAFFIX DEVICES, INC. v. MARKETING DISPLAYS, INC. No. 99-1571. Argued November 29, 2000 Decided March 20, 2001 John G. Roberts, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Gregory G. Garre and Jeanne-Marie Marshall. De
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.
A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; Geffen Records, Inc., a corporation; Interscope Records; Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.; MCA Records, Inc.; Atlantic Recording Corp.; Island Records, Inc.; Motown Record Co.; Capitol Records, Inc., Plaintif
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
FESTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHOKETSU KINZOKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI CO., LTD., a/k/a SMC Corporation, and SMC Pneumatics, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-1066. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Nov. 29, 20
In re Swartz
In re Mitchell R. SWARTZ No. 00-1108. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Nov. 8, 2000 Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 2000. Dr. Mitchell Swartz, pro se, of Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts. Albín F. Drost, Acting Solicitor, U.S. Patent
Jacobs v. Patent Enforcement Fund, Inc.
Joseph J. JACOBS, Trustee of the Jacobs Family Trust of 10/13/80, Dennis P.A. Tobin, Dixon Frick Burden, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PATENT ENFORCEMENT FUND, INC, a Delaware Corp, Robert L. Hill, Fred Singer, Valutron, NV, a Netherlands Antill
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.