Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Board of Regents
ELI LILLY & CO., Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, Appellee. No. 02-1610. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: July 3, 2003. Charles E. Lipsey, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunne
In re Aimster Copyright Litigation
In re: AIMSTER COPYRIGHT LITIGATION. Appeal of: John Deep, Defendant. No. 02-4125. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued June 4, 2003. Decided June 30, 2003. Floyd A. Mandell, Bradley S. Rochlen, Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenm
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
DASTAR CORP. v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP. et al. No. 02-428. Argued April 2, 2003 Decided June 2, 2003 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Breyer, J., who took no part in the cons
In re California Innovations, Inc.
In re CALIFORNIA INNOVATIONS, INC. No. 02-1407. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: May 22, 2003. Michael A. Grow, Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief w
Mazzari v. Rogan
Darrel A. MAZZARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Michael T. Sheedy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. ROGAN, Director, Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-1269. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 17, 2003.
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc.
MOSELEY et al., dba VICTOR’S LITTLE SECRET v. V SECRET CATALOGUE, INC., et al. No. 01-1015. Argued November 12, 2002 Decided March 4, 2003 Stevens, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court with respect to Parts I, II, and IV, and the
In re Berg
In re Richard A. BERG, Paul D. Toman, and Donald G. Wallace. Nos. 02-1120, 02-1160. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Feb. 20, 2003. Richard Aron Osman, Science & Technology Law Group, of Hillsborough, CA, argued for
Eldred v. Ashcroft
ELDRED et al. v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL No. 01-618. Argued October 9, 2002 Decided January 15, 2003 Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O’Connor, Scaua, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, JJ., join
In re Peterson
In re Lance G. PETERSON and Ioannis Vasatis. No. 02-1129. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 8, 2003. James T. Hosmer, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., of Arlington, VA, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was Leonard C.
In re Majestic Distilling Co.
In re MAJESTIC DISTILLING COMPANY, INC. Nos. 02-1243, 74,622,781. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 2, 2003. William G. Pecau, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, of New York, NY, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Carol
In re Bass
In re Robert T. BASS. No. 02-1046. Reexamination Nos. 90/004, 127 and 90/004, 403. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 17, 2002. David K. Friedland, Lott & Friedland, P.A., of Coral Gables, Florida, argued for appellant. W
In re Jolley
In re Scott T. JOLLEY. No. 01-1646. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Oct. 29, 2002. Donald Edward Scott, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott, of Denver, Colorado, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Ja
In re Huston
In re Charles D. HUSTON and Darryl J. Cornish. No. 02-1048. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: Oct. 17, 2002. Charles D. Houston, Thompson & Knight, L.L.P., of Austin, Texas, argued for appellants. Sydney O. Johnson,
In re Bogese
In re Stephen B. BOGESE II. No. 01-1354. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 13, 2002. Perry J. Saidman, Saidman DesignLaw Group, of Silver Spring, MD, for appellant. John M. Whealan, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, U
In re Thrift
In re Philip R. THRIFT and Charles T. Hemphill. No. 01-1445. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 9, 2002. Ronald O. Neerings, Texas Instruments Incorporated, of Dallas, Texas, argued for appellants. Of counsel on the brief
Allen Engineering Corp. v. Bartell Industries, Inc.
ALLEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BARTELL INDUSTRIES, INC. and Darragh Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-1238. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 1, 2002. Paul McNeill, Womack, Landis, Phelps, McN
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.
ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED, and Chugai Pharma U.S.A., Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Biomerieux, Inc., and Becton Dickinson and Company, Defendants-Appellees, and Biomerieux SA, Defenda
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.
ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED, and Chugai Pharma U.S.A., Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Biomerieux, Inc., and Becton Dickinson and Company, Defendants-Appellees, and Biomerieux SA, Defenda
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Inverizon International, Inc.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; Verizon Trademark Services, LLC, formerly known as Bell Atlantic Trademark Services, LLC, Appellants, v. INVERIZON INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee. No. 01-3503. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Sub
Blacklight Power, Inc. v. Rogan
BLACKLIGHT POWER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. ROGAN, Director, Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-1530. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: June 28, 2002. Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Hen
In re McDaniel
In re C. Steven McDANIEL, Frank M. Raushel, and James R. Wild. No. 01-1307. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 19, 2002. C. Steven McDaniel, McDaniel & Associates, P.C., of Austin, TX, argued for appellants. Kristin L. Yo
Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg Co.
DETHMERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AUTOMATIC EQUIPMENT MFG CO., Appellant. Nos. 00-1114, 00-1130. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 13, 2002. David A. Tank, Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts
In re Doyle
In re Michael P. DOYLE. 01-1439 (Serial no. 08/601,101). United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 12, 2002. Meredith Martin Addy, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. With her on the brief were Rob
Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.
HOLMES GROUP, INC. v. VORNADO AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, INC. No. 01-408. Argued March 19, 2002 — Decided June 3, 2002 James W. Dabney argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Paul Izzo, Timothy P. Gallogly, Arthur R. Mille
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.