Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Graff
In re Paul GRAFF. No. 96-1349. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 14, 1997. Lawrence M. Green, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Richard F. Giunta. Nancy J. Linck
In re Portola Packaging, Inc.
In re PORTOLA PACKAGING, INC. No. 96-1376. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 7, 1997. Julian Caplan, San Francisco, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were C. Michael Zimmerman and Janet E. Muller.
Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lehman
HOECHST-ROUSSEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce A. LEHMAN, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant-Appellee, and William K. Summers, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-1104. United
In re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.
In re DIXIE RESTAURANTS, INC. No. 96-1129. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 27, 1997. Gary N. Speed, P.A., Little Rock, AR, argued, for appellant. Of counsel was Kathryn Bennett Perkins, Rose Law Firm. Nancy C. Slutter,
In re Hacot-Colombier
In re HACOT-COLOMBIER. No. 96-1240. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 21, 1997. Andrew J. Gray, IV, Jacobson, Price, Holman & Stem, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief was Simor L. Mosko
In re Mayne
In re Nancy G. MAYNE, Rama Belagaje, Paul J. Burnett and Hansen M. Hsiung. No. 95-1522. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 17, 1997. Paul J. Gaylo, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, argued, for appellants. With him
Warnervision Entertainment Inc. v. Empire of Carolina, Inc.
WARNERVISION ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. EMPIRE OF CAROLINA, INC., Empire Industries, Inc., Empire Manufacturing, Inc. and Thomas Lowe Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Playing Mantis, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellan
In re Huang
In re Ben HUANG. No. 96-1126. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Nov. 12, 1996. Francis A. Utecht, Fulwider, Patton, Lee & Utecht, of Long Beach, California, argued for appellant. Kenneth R. Corsello, Associate Solicitor, U.S.
Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, Inc.
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, Macmillan, Inc., and St. Martin’s Press, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC., and James M. Smith, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-1778. United’ States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Re
In re Kemps
In re Andreas G. KEMPS. No. 96-1130. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 8, 1996. Andrew J. Patch, Young & Thompson, Arlington, VA, argued, for appellant. Linda Moneys Isacson, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor,
Guinn v. Kopf
Perry W. GUINN, Gary N. Mills, Robert A. Bedient and Martin O. Greeley, Appellants, v. Henry B. KOPF, Appellee. No. 96-1098. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 26, 1996. Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Bane
In re Borden
In re Joseph BORDEN. No. 96-1057. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 24, 1996. Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1996. Michael J. Sweedler, Darby & Darby, New York City, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Kwadjo Adu
In re ECCS, Inc.
In re ECCS, INC. No. 95-1400. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 6, 1996. Mark B. Harrison, Spencer, Frank & Schneider, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Kevin T. Kramer, Associate Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademar
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. United States
PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, International Trademark Association, Amicus Curiae. No. 95-3104. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1996. Decided Jun
Merck & Co. v. Kessler
MERCK & CO., INC., and MSD Technology, L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Bracco Diagnostics Inc. and Bracco International B.V., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and Syntex (U.S.A.)
McCarthy v. Recordex Service, Inc.
Mary Ruth McCARTHY; Guy Colville; Edward Ormsby; Carmen Tomasetti; Joseph Hoffman, Appellants, v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.; Copyright, Inc.; Smart Corp., National Headquarters Medical Records Copying; Medfax Incorporated; Hospital Corresponde
Holbrook v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.
Grace A. HOLBROOK, Administratrix of the Estate of John P. Holbrook v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.; Marine Transport Lines Inc.; Puerto Rico Marine Mgmt., Inc.; Sea-Land Service, Inc.; Second Shipmor Associates v. The BABCOCK & WILCOX C
Borkins v. United States Postal Service
No. 94-8915. No. 95-832. No. 95-850. No. 95-882. No. 95-5407. No. 95-6385. No. 95-6546. No. 95-6583. No. 95-6601. No. 95-6813. No. 95-6840. No. 95-6974. No. 95-7180. Borkins v. United States Postal Service et al., Jensen v. Reno, Attorney G
Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.
EXXON CHEMICAL PATENTS, INC., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-1275, 94-1309. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Feb. 23, 199
Maresca v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks
No. 95-864. Maresca v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks.
Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC. No. 94-2003. Argued January 8,1996 Decided January 16, 1996 Henry B. Gutman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kerry L. Konrad, Jeffrey E. Ostrow, Arthur R. Mi
Astra v. Lehman
Aktiebolaget ASTRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce A. LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant-Appellee. No. 9A-1388. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 13, 1995. Edward V. Filardi, White & Case, New York
Mahurkar v. Impra, Inc.
In re MAHURKAR DOUBLE LUMEN HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER PATENT LITIGATION. Sakharam MAHURKAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, Quinton Instruments Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. IMPRA, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-1242. United States Court of Appeals, F
Premysler v. Lehman
Philip A. PREMYSLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce A. LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-1219. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 1, 1995. Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.