Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc.
PALL CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. MICRON SEPARATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-1393, 91-1394 and 91-1409. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 26, 1995. Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1995. H. Michael Ha
In re Chu
In re Paul CHU, William Downs, John B. Doyle and Peter V. Smith. No. 95-1038. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 14, 1995. Daniel S. Kalka, McDermott Incorporated, argued for appellant. Of counsel was Peter C. Michalos,
Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.
EXXON CHEMICAL PATENTS, INC., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-1275, 94-1309. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 1, 199
Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc.
PALL CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. MICRON SEPARATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-1393, 91-1394 and 91-1409. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 14, 1995. H. Michael Hartmann, Mark E. Phelps, Paul J. K
Agee v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
Michael L. AGEE, d/b/a L & H Records, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARAMOUNT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 893, Docket 94-7670. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Feb. 24, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995
Bull S.A. v. Comer
BULL S.A., Appellant v. Douglas B. COMER, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Appellee. No. 94-5106. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 3, 1995. Decided June 9, 1995. Joseph S. Presta, Falls Churc
In re Napier
In re James C. NAPIER. No. 93-1363. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 22, 1995. Donald E. Stout, Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on brief were William I. Solomon and Alan E.
Ray v. Lehman
Ralph D. RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-1236. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 17, 1995. Charles E. Bruzga, New York City, argued, for plaint
In re Beauregard
In re Gary M. BEAUREGARD, Larry K. Loucks, Khoa Dang Nguyen and Robert J. Urquhart. No. 95-1054. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 12, 1995. Nancy J. Linck, Sol., Albín F. Drost, Deputy Sol. and Richard Torczon, Associate
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS, INC., Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS, Appellee. No. 94-5027. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Feb. 17, 1995. Decided April 21, 1995. David M. Pitcher a
Eiselstein v. Frank
Herbert L. EISELSTEIN, Jerry A. Harris, Darrell F. Smith, Jr., Edward F. Clatworthy, Stephen Floreen and Jeffrey M. Davidson, Appellants, v. Richard B. FRANK, Terry A. Debold, Sunil Widge and James W. Martin, Appellees. No. 94-1374. United
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.
Herbert MARKMAN and Positek, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC. and Althon Enterprises, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-1049. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 5, 1995. William B. Mallín, Ecke
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.
QUALITEX CO. v. JACOBSON PRODUCTS CO., INC. No. 93-1577. Argued January 9, 1995 Decided March 28, 1995 Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Donald G. Mulack argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Ch
Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, Appellant. No. 93-2214. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard Oct. 6, 1994. Decided March 9, 1995. Gary L. Rebaek, with whom Peter
Patent Office Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. No. 93-1676. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Dec. 5, 1994. Decided Feb. 28, 1995. Joseph V. Kaplan, S
Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc.
TRANSCO PRODUCTS INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING, INC. and Performance Contracting Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-1431. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 14, 1994. Robert Edward Wagner,
In re Paulsen
In re David C. PAULSEN. No. 94-1012. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 3, 1994. J. Georg Seka, Attorney, Townsend and Townsend Khourie and Crew, San Francisco, CA, argued, for appellant. Harris Pitlick, Attorney, Com’r o
In re Alappat
In re Kuriappan P. ALAPPAT, Edward E. Averill and James G. Larsen. No. 92-1381. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 29, 1994. Alexander C. Johnson, Jr., Marger, Johnson, McCollom & Stolowitz, P.C., Portland, OR, argued for
In re Freeman
In re Jerre M. FREEMAN. No. 93-1449. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 12, 1994. Bradford E. Kile, Baker & McKenzie, Washington, DC, argued, for appellant.. With him on the brief were Ruffin B. Cordell and Stuart M. Weit
Professional Programs Group v. Department of Commerce
PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMS GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Ron Brown , Secretary of the Department of Commerce; Bruce Lehman , Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55172. United States Court
Patent Office Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. Nos. 93-1
Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Ass'n of America v. Oman
SATELLITE BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ralph OMAN, in his capacity as Register of Copyrights, and Director of the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress, and the Copyright Off
In re Donaldson Co.
In re DONALDSON COMPANY, INC. No. 91-1386. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Feb. 14, 1994. R. Carl Moy, Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell; Welter & Schmidt, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for appellant. Fred E. McKelvey
Abrutyn v. Giovanniello
Eric S. ABRUTYN and Robert J. Sloan, Appellants, v. Rocco GIOVANNIELLO, Appellee. Nos. 93-1248, 93-1249. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Jan. 27, 1994. Chris Doninger, Glynn & Byrnes, Fleming-ton, NJ, argued for appellants.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.