Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Zurko
In re Mary E. ZURKO, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. Lipner. No. 96-1258. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 4, 1998.
Good News Communications, Inc. v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
No. 97-1484. Good News Communications, Inc. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Chavez v. Arte Publico Press
Denise CHAVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, United States of America, Intervenor, v. ARTE PUBLICO PRESS; Nicolas Kanellos; University of Houston, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-2881. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 20, 1998. As R
Chavez v. Arte Publico Press
Denise CHAVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, United States of America, Intervenor, v. ARTE PUBLICO PRESS; Nicolas Kanellos; University of Houston, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-2881. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 20, 1998. Kenn
Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp.
The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXON CORPORATION and Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Defendants/Cross Appellants. Nos. 97-1347, 97-1351. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 24, 1998. Harry J. Roper, Roper
Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.
EXXON CHEMICAL PATENTS, INC., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-1021. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 4, 1998. R
National Treasury Employees Union v. King
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, Lila Sanders, Carol Field, Robert A. Morris, and all similarly situated unnamed individuals, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Patent Office Professional Association, Plaintiff, v. James KING, Director, Office of
In re Clement
In re CLEMENT. No. 97-1202. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 12, 1997. Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined Feb. 18, 1998. Lawrence M. Green, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., Boston, MA, argued for
Patent Office Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. No. 96-1277. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 17, 1997. Decided Nov. 7, 1997. Lynne K. Zusman, Wa
Wu v. Ching-Rong Wang
Jinn F. WU, Appellant, v. Ching-Rong WANG, Appellee. No. 96-1492. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Nov. 6, 1997. Robert V. Vickers, Vickers, Daniels & Young, Cleveland, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Richard E. Fitcher,
In re Schreiber
In Re SCHREIBER No. 97-1201. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 23, 1997. Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Declined Dec. 17, 1997. Joseph B. Taphorn, Poughkeepsie, NY, argued for appellant. Joseph G. Pic
Hazani v. United States International Trade Commission
Emanuel HAZANI and Patent Enforcement Fund, Inc., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc., and NEC Corporation and NEC Electronics,
In re Emert
In Re Jack EMERT and Robert D. Lundberg, Appellants. No. 96-1559. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 18, 1997. Lawrence F. Scinto, Fitzpatrick, Celia, Harper & Scinto, New York City, argued, for appellants. With him on t
Evans Cooling Systems, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
EVANS COOLING SYSTEMS, INC. and Patent Enforcement Fund, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-1146. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 16, 1997. Karl R. Fink, Fitch, Even, Tabi
In re Portola Packaging, Inc.
In re PORTOLA PACKAGING, INC. No. 96-1376. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 12, 1997. Julian Caplan, San Francisco, California, for appellant. Of counsel were C. Michael Zimmerman and Janet E. Muller. Nancy J. Linek, S
In re Morris
In re Charles P. MORRIS, Kenneth L. Pottebaum, and John D. Stricklin. No. 96-1425. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Decided Sept. 10, 1997. Rehearing Granted with no change in result and in banc suggestion declined Sept. 22,
In re McGrew
In re Stephen P. McGREW. No. 96-1042. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 7, 1997. Edward W. Bulehis, Seed & Berry, Seattle, WA, argued, for appellant. Nancy J. Linck, Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washingto
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.
SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY; Shirley K.Adams; Henry Ashworth; Carla M. Aspaas; Eric K. Aspaas; Helen Ruth Aspaas; Laurabelle Aspaas; Leta M. Adkins; Rita M.Adkins; Maxwell C. Anderson; Earl A.
In re Lonardo
In re Robert LONARDO (Serial No. 08/218,756). In re RESTORATIVE CARE (Reexamination No. 90/003,494). In re RESTORATIVE CARE (Reexamination No. 90/002,343). Nos. 96-1101, 96-1123 and 96-1124. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
In re Geisler
In re Michael GEISLER, Rudolf Kotter-Faulhaber, Susanne Wuerz and Michael Jung. No. 96-1362. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 7, 1997. F. Brice Faller, Felfe & Lynch, New York City, argued, for appellants. With him on t
In re Dossel
In re Olaf H. DOSSEL and Walter H. Kullmann. No. 96-1340. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 27, 1997. Jack D. Slobod, U.S. Philips Corporation, Tarrytown, NY, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief were Jack E. Hake
In re Lueders
In re William R. LUEDERS. No. 96-1391. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 24, 1997. Ronald 0. Neerings, Texas Instruments Incorporated, of Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Jay M. Cantor, Washin
In re Mac Dermid, Inc.
In re MAC DERMID, INC. No. 96-1491. Reexamination No. 90/003,373. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 15, 1997. James R. Cartiglia, St. Onge, Steward, Johnston & Reens, L.L.C., Stamford, Connecticut, filed a Response to A
In re Zurko
In re Mary E. ZURKO, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. Lipner. No. 96-1258. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 15, 19
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.