Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Preformed Line Products Co. v. Watson
No. 471. Preformed Line Products Co. v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents. Patrick H. Hume and C. Willard Hayes for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondent.
Commissariat à L'Energie Atomique v. Watson
No. 826. Commissariat à L’Energie Atomique v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. David Ginsburg, James L. Morrisson and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.
Rubenfield v. Watson
No. 622. Rubenfield v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents. Bruce B. Krost for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Petrocarbon Ltd. v. Watson
No. 711. Petrocarbon Limited v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents. Ralph H. Hudson, Harold J. Kinney and M. K. Hobbs for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Morton Hollander for respondent.
De Sylva v. Ballentine
De SYLVA v. BALLENTINE, GUARDIAN. No. 529. Argued April 25-26, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Theodore Kiendl argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pat A. McCormick and John H. Cleary, Jr. Max Fink argued the cause for re
Campbell v. Commissioner of Patents
No. 300. Campbell v. Commissioner of Patents. Harvey L. Lechner and Edward H. Davis for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Mazer v. Stein
MAZER et al., doing business as JUNE LAMP MANUFACTURING CO., v. STEIN et al., doing business as REGLOR OF CALIFORNIA. No. 228. Argued December 3, 1953. Decided March 8, 1954. Max R. Kraus and Robert L. Kahn argued the cause and filed a brie
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Marzall
No. 240. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Marzall (Watson Substituted), Commissioner of Patents. Frank H. Marks, C. Willard Hayes and Ivan P. Tashof for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade a
Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc. v. Marzall
No. 118. Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents, et al. James R. McKnight and Emory L. Groff for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Paul A. Sweeney and Hubert H. Margolies
Patent Scaffolding Co. v. Up-Right, Inc.
No. 738. Patent Scaffolding Co., Inc. v. Up-Right, Inc. et al. C. P. Goepel and Stuart N. Updike for petitioner. Oscar A. Mellin and Jack E. Hursh for respondents.
Asseff v. Marzall
No. 200. Asseff et al. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents. John F. Oberlin and Almon S. Nelson for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge and Paul A. Sweeney for respondent.
Ambrose v. Marzall
No. 59. Ambrose et al. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents. Alva D. Adams and Stone E. Bush for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney and Melvin Richter for respondent.
Kingsland v. Dorsey
KINGSLAND, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v. DORSEY. No. 53. Argued October 18-19, 1949. Decided November 21, 1949. Robert L. Stern argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General
Edgerton v. Kingsland
No. 652. Edgerton v. Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents. David Riñes and Frank W. Dahn for petitioner. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney, Alvin O. West and W. W. Cochran for respondent.
In re Refrigeration Patents Corp.
No. 125, Misc. In re Refrigeration Patents Corporation. June 3, 1946. Tracy R. V. Fike for petitioner.
Burt v. Coe
No. 382. Burt v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. January 14, 1946.
Hoover Co. v. Coe
HOOVER COMPANY v. COE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. No. 486. Argued March 5, 1945. Decided April 30, 1945. Messrs. William D. Sellers and Richard R. Fitzsim-mons, with whom Mr. William S. Hodges was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. T. Hayward
Special Equipment Co. v. Coe
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT CO. v. COE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. No. 469. Argued March 2, 6, 1945. Decided March 26, 1945. Messrs. Clarence J. Loftus and Curtis F. Prangley, with whom Messrs. James Ballard Moore and James M. Graves were on the brief,
Geophysical Development Corp. v. Coe
No. 269. Geophysical Development Corporation et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. October 11, 1943. Mr. Lawrence Koenigsberger for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Joseph Y. Houghton for respo
Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe
No. 799. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. April 19, 1943. Mr. Frank E. Scrivener for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Valentine Brookes and Leon Frechtel for responde
Marine v. Coe
No. 1034. Marine v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. April 27, 1942. Mr. Richard E. Marine, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Melvin H. Siegel for respondent.
Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
EXHIBIT SUPPLY CO. v. ACE PATENTS CORPORATION. No. 154. Argued January 15, 16, 1942. Decided February 2, 1942. Mr. John H. Sutherland, with whom Mr. Clarence E. Threedy was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Casper W. Ooms, with whom Mr. Jo
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe
Nos. 257, 258 and 259. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. January 12, 1942.
General Motors Corp. v. Coe
No. 718. General Motors Corp. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. November 24, 1941. Messrs. Drury W. Cooper and Frank E. Liverance, Jr. for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea and Mr. Melvin H. Siegel
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.