Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New Mexico v. Texas
NEW MEXICO v. TEXAS. IN EQUITY. No. 2, Original, Argued December 2, 1924. Decided December 5, 1927. 1. A copy of memoranda and field notes of a survey of part- of the boundary between Mexico and Texas, made in 1852 by a Mexican engineer by
Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. United States
INDEPENDENT COAL & COKE COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 300. Argued April 26, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. 1. A bill in the nature of a supplemental bill is approp
Overland Motor Co. v. Packard Motor Co.
OVERLAND MOTOR COMPANY v. PACKARD MOTOR COMPANY et al. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 285. Argued April 21, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. 1. An applicant for patent who cancels one of his claims wit
Lowe v. Dickson
LOWE v. DICKSON. CERTIORARI to the supreme court of the state of OKLAHOMA. No. 158. Argued February 24, 1927. Decided April 11, 1927. A second or additional homestead entry, not authorized by law when made, but asserted and claimed in good
Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United States
PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM AND TRANSPORT COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 305. Argued October 4, 5, 1926. Decided February 28, 1927. 1. The evidence sustains findings that th
De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United States
DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 142. Argued January 20, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. A license to make and use a patented article does not depend on formal language, and, as a def
Jones v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
JONES et al., TRUSTEES, v. PRAIRIE OIL AND GAS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN. DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 109. Argued January 11, 1927. Decided January 24, 1927. 1. Notice of an application of a mother
Mosler Safe Co. v. Ely-Norris Safe Co.
MOSLER SAFE COMPANY v. ELY-NORRIS SAFE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 94. Argued January 7, 1927. Decided January 17, 1927. A manufacturer of safes which are' equipped with a patented “ ex-.
Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. James
LOS ANGELES BRUSH MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. JAMES, DISTRICT JUDGE. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION FOR MANDAMUS. No. —, Original. Motion submitted October 25, 1926. Denied January 3, 1927. 1. In the exercise of its appellate jurisdic
Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.
POSTUM CEREAL COMPANY v. CALIFORNIA FIG NUT COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 22. Submitted November 9, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. A proceeding in the Court of Appeals of the District of Columb
United States v. General Electric Co.
UNITED STATES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 113. Argued October 13, 1926. Decided November 23, 1926. 1. Through a system of contracts between a company
I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.
I. T. S. RUBBER COMPANY v. ESSEX RUBBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF (APPEALS FOR THE • FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 36. Argued April 13, 1926. Decided November 22, 1926. 1. The Court may decline to consider points not presented in.com
United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. CHEMICAL FOUNDATION, INC. 'APPEAL from the circuit court of appeals for the THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 127. Argued December 9, 10, 11, 1925. Decided October 11, 1926. 1. A decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals, entered prior to th
Jaybird Mining Co. v. Weir
JAYBIRD MINING COMPANY v. WEIR, COUNTY TREASURER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 293. Argued April 29, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. Where mining land owned by incompetent Quapaw Indians under a patent subject to
United States v. Candelaria
UNITED STATES v. CANDELARIA et al. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 208. Argued November 18, 19, 1925. Decided June 1, 1926. 1. The Pueblo Indian tribes in New Mexico are dependent communities und
Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. Arma Engineering Co.
SPERRY GYROSCOPE COMPANY v. ARMA ENGINEERING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 'STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ‘ EASTERN DISTRICT OF-NEW YORK. No. 239. Argued April 15, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. In a suit in the District Court against a priv
Childers v. Beaver
CHILDERS, STATE AUDITOR, v. BEAVER et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT''OF OKLAHOMA. No. 202. Argued March 9, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Transfer by descent from one tribal-Indian-to another of
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Reed
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. REED et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 57. Submitted October 15, 1925. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The term “ settlement ” is used in the Homestead Law as comprehending a
Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.
LUCKETT v. DELPARK, INC., et al APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 220. Argued March 16, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1: A suit is within the jurisdiction of the District Court, as arising unde
Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.
ALEXANDER MILBURN COMPANY v. DAVIS-BOURNONVILLE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 107. Argued January 11, 12, 1926. Decided March 8, 1926. 1. Where a patent application fully and adequately disc
First Moon v. White Tail
FIRST MOON v. WHITE TAIL AND UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT QP OKLAHOMA. No. 191. Argued January 29, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1 A decision of the Secretary of the Interior det
United States v. Minnesota
UNITED STATES v. MINNESOTA. No. 17, Original. Argued January 4, 5, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. A suit against a State brought by the United States as guardian of tribal Indians to recover the title, or money proceeds, of lands alleged t
United States v. Holt State Bank
UNITED STATES v. HOLT STATE BANK et al. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued April 24, 27, 1925. Decided February 1, 1926. 1. In general, lands underlying navigable waters within a State belong to
Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp.
INDEPENDENT WIRELESS TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 87. Argued October 23, 1925. Decided January 11, 1926. C A suit by an exclusive licensee under a
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.