Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
No. 154. No. 155. No. 156. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.; Genco, Inc. v. Ace Patents Corp.; and Chicago Coin Machine Co. v. Ace Patents Corp. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Clarence E. Threedy and John H. Sutherland for petitioners. Mr
Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
No. 154. No. 155. No. 156. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.; Genco, Inc. v. Ace Patents Corp.; and Chicago Coin Machine Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
Cinema Patents Co. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.
No. 815. Cinema Patents Co., Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Corp. et al. April 27, 1936. Mr. Herbert A. Huebner for petitioner. Mr. Frank L. A. Graham for. respondents.
Peters Patent Corp. v. Bates & Klinke, Inc.
PETERS PATENT CORP. v. BATES & KLINKE, INC. No. 601. Argued April 12, 1935. — Decided May 13, 1935. Mr. Harold E. Cole, with whom Messrs. Benjamin A. Levy and Joseph B. Jacobs were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Herbert B. Barlow was on
Wigton v. Coe
No. 737. Wigton v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. March 5, 1934. Mr. Henry H. Snelling for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. W. Marvin Smith and T. A. Hostetler for respondent.
Corning Glass Works v. Robertson
No. 199. Corning Glass Works v. Robertson, Commissioner of Patents. October 9, 1933. Messrs. Edward S. Rogers, Vernon M. Dorsey, and Wm. R. Green, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Paul D. Miller and T. A. Hostetler f
Board of Trustees v. United States
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS No. 538. Argued February 17, 1933 . — Decided March 20, 1933 Mr. Sveinbjorn Johnson for petitioner. Solicitor General Tha
Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Co.
CARBICE CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN PATENTS DEVELOPMENT CO. et al. No. 54. Reargued April 27, 1931. Decided May 18, 1931. Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., for petitioner. Mr. Charles Neave for respondents.
Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.
No. 54. Carbice Corporation of America v. American Patents Development Corp. et al. Submitted March 16, 1931. Decided April 13, 1931.
Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.
CARBICE CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN PATENTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. No. 54. Argued January 16, 19, 1931. Decided March 9, 1931. Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., for petitioner. Mr. Charles Neave, with whom Messrs. George C. Dean and
Saranac Automatic Machine Corp. v. Wirebounds Patents Co.
SARANAC AUTOMATIC MACHINE CORPORATION v. WIREBOUNDS PATENTS COMPANY et al. No. 51. Argued January 13, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Messrs. Howard M. Cox and Amasa C. Paul for petitioner. Mr. Laurence A. Janney, with whom Mr. Edward F. D
Kinney-Coastal Oil Co. v. Kieffer
KINNEY-COASTAL OIL COMPANY et al. v. KIEFFER et al. No. 64. Argued October 25, 1927. Decided June 4, 1928. Mr. Edward M. Freeman, with whom. Mr. Paul P. Prosser was on the brief, for petitioners. The remedy provided by the Act of 1914 is no
Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Ass'n
WILLING et al. v. CHICAGO AUDITORIUM ASSOCIATION. No. 561. Argued April 19, 20, 1928. Decided May 21, 1928. Mr. Charles Evans Hughes, with whom Messrs. Samuel Topliff and Hbmer H. Cooper were on the brief, for petitioners. The law of the St
Long v. Rockwood
LONG, COMMISSIONER, v. ROCKWOOD. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 201 and 202. Argued January 20, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. F. Delano Putnam, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, with whom Messrs. Arthur K. Reading, Attorney General, and R.
Work v. Braffet
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. BRAFFET, ADMINISTRATOR. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 344. Argued March 8, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Under Rev. Stats. § 2347, and Rule I of the Regulations o
Larkin v. Paugh
LARKIN v. PAUGH et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA No. 137. Argued December 9, 1927. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Rev. Stats., § 2448, providing that where a patent for “public lands ” shall issue in pursuance of any law of t
Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.
CORONA CORD TIRE COMPANY v. DOVAN CHEMICAL CORPORATION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 182. Argued January 16, 17, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Discovery that a change of ingredients in a process
Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. American Valve & Meter Co.
FAIRBANKS, MORSE & COMPANY et al. v. AMERICAN VALVE & METER COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 262. Returns to rule to show cause submitted February 20, 1928. — Decided March 19, 1928. 1.
Kornhauser v. United States
KORNHAUSER v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 162. Submitted January 12, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. Claimant successfully defended an accounting suit brought by his former law partner respecting shares of stock
Longest v. Langford
LONGEST v. LANGFORD. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP OKLAHOMA'. No. 52. Submitted October 19, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. Under § 22 of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Agreement of July 1, 1902, lands allotted in the name of a married C
Marlin v. Lewallen
MARLIN v. LEWALLEN et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OE OKLAHOMA. No. 40. Argued October 18, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. The surviving husband of a woman of the Creek blood and tribe, whether himself of that blood or not, has
Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.
BARBER ASPHALT PAYING COMPANY v. STANDARD ASPHALT & RUBBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE'CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH' CIRCUIT. No. 194. Argued October 4, 5, 1927. Decided January 3, 1928. 1. Equity Rule 75b; which prescribes the f
Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States
RICHMOND SCREW ANCHOR COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP CLAIMS No. 99. Argued December 1, 1927. Decided January 3, 1928. 1. Patent No. 1,228,120, issued May 29, 1917, to Lenke for a cargo beam capable of moving on a horiz
Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.
TEMCO ELECTRIC MOTOR COMPANY v. APCO MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 37. Argued October 18, 1927. Decided January 3, 1928. 1. Large public demand for, and Commercial success, of,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.