Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brothers v. United States
BROTHERS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 309. Argued' March 28, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. An unliquidated claim against the United States, under the Act of . June 25, 1910, c. 423, 36 Stat. 851, for the alleged infr
Moore v. United States
MOORE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 278. Argued March 21, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. The Act of June 25,1910, c. 423, 36 Stat. 851, allowing compensation . from the United States for use of patented inventions, p
Union Oil Co. v. Smith
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 8. Submitted November 13, 1918. Decided March 31, 1919. In order to create valid rights or initiate a title as against the United States un
Lane v. Darlington
LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. DARLINGTON ET AL., TRUSTEES, ESTATE OF CLAPP. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 219. Argued March 12, 1919. Decided March 31, 1919. An official resurvey of the boundary of
Miller v. McClain
MILLER ET AL. v. McCLAIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 19. Submitted November 13, 1918. Decided March 31, 1919. An Indian holding a trust patent under the General Allotment Act of 1887, who leases his allotment wit
Gold v. Newton
No. 873. Edward E. Gold et al. v. James T. Newton, Commissioner of Patents. March 24, 1919. Mr. William A. Redding and Mr. Arthur C. Fraser for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
Werk v. Parker
WERK ET AL., COPARTNERS UNDER THE NAME OF ROBERT F. WERK & COMPANY, v. PARKER ET AL., COPARTNERS UNDER THE NAME OF F. T. PARKER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 73. Argued November 21, 1918. Dec
L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.
L. A. WESTERMANN COMPANY v. DISPATCH PRINTING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 50. Submitted November 15, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. The liability imposed by § 25 of the Copyright Act attaches
Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Co.
COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. ALHAMBRA CIGAR & CIGARETTE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 180. Submitted January 22, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. An appeal from the Supreme Co
Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.
BUTTE & SUPERIOR COPPER COMPANY, LIMITED, v. CLARK-MONTANA REALTY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 598. Argued January 10, 13, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. In a suit brought in the District
United States v. New Orleans Pacific Railway
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEA
Fisher v. Rule
FISHER v. RULE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 78. Argued November 22, 1918. Decided January 7, 1919. To initiate a right under the homestead act a minor’s application must show that he is the head of a
International News Service v. Associated Press
INTERNATIONAL NEWS SERVICE v. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued May 2, 3, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. An incorporated association of proprietors and representatives
Ruddy v. Rossi
RUDDY v. ROSSI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO,. No. 17. Submitted November 13, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Section 4 of the Homestead Act of May 20,1862, (§ 2296, Rev. Stats.), providing that no lands acquired under-t
United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.
UNITED DRUG COMPANY v. THEODORE RECTANUS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF .APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 27. Argued March 12, 13, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A right of trade-mark is not a right in gross; it exists only
Van Dyke v. Arizona Eastern Railroad
VAN DYKE ET AL. v. ARIZONA EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARIZONA. No. 59. Argued November 19, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A railroad company, having surveyed a line over public land and filed map a
E. W. Bliss Co. v. United States
E. W. BLISS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 15. Argued November 20, 21, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. In a contract for supplying torpedoes, the manufacturer agreed with the G
Exploration Co. v. United States
EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 277. Argued May 1, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. Statutes of limitation upon suits to set aside fraudulent transactio
Grinnell Washing Machine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.
GRINNELL WASHING MACHINE COMPANY v. E. E. JOHNSON COMPANY. CERTIORARI. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 272. Argued April 26, 29, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. Patent' No. 950,402, granted to W. F. Phillips, for a
Minnesota v. Lane
STATE OF MINNESOTA v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 20. Original. Motion to dismiss. Argued April 15, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. An act of Congress granted the "undisposed of” lands in certain sections to a State,
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
UNITED STATES v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED SPATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ^ No. 207. Argued March 16, 19, 20, 21, 1917; restored to docket for re-argument May
Perlman v. United States
PERLMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 752. Argued April 18, 1918. Decided May 6, 1918. An order of the District Court allowing the District Atto
United States v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.
UNITED STATES v. WHITED & WHELESS, LIMITED, ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 204. Submitted March 19, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. The provision in the Act of March 3, 1891, § 8, á6 Stat. 1099, that “
Rock Spring Distilling Co. v. W. A. Gaines & Co.
ROCK SPRING DISTILLING COMPANY ET AL. v. W. A. GAINES & COMPANY. CERTIOEAEI TO THE CIBCUIT COURT, OF APPEALS FOE THE SIXTH CIBCUIT. No. 58. Argued January 31, February 1, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. Under the common law and the federal re
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.