Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.
WEBER ELECTRIC COMPANY v. E. H. FREEMAN ELECTRIC COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR' THE THIRD CIRCUIT. ’ No. 273. Argued April 21, 1921. Decided June 6, 1921. 1. A patented device for fastening together the metal cap a
United States v. Hutto
UNITED STATES v. HUTTO ET AL. (NO. 1) ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 691. Argued April 11, 1921. Decided June 1, 1921. 1. Revised Statutes, § 2078, declaring that “No person employ
United States v. Bowling
UNITED STATES v. BOWLING ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 295. Argued April 27, 1921. Decided June 1, 1921. 1. The power of the United States to ensure, by appropriate measures, that land allotted in
McLaren v. Fleischer
McLAREN, ADMINISTRATOR of McLAREN, v. FLEISCHER. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 291. Argued April 26, 27, 1921. Decided June 1, 1921. The Act of Maj 14, 1880, c. 89, 21 Stat. 140, provides that-“where any pe
United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 325. Argued October 7, 1920. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The Northern Pacific Railroad Act of July .2, 1864, c. 217, 13 St
American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead
AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. WHITEHEAD, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 131. Argued January 12, 13, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. Decided on the authority of Baldwin Co. v. Howard
Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co.
THE BALDWIN COMPANY ET AL. v. R. S. HOWARD COMPANY. THE BALDWIN COMPANY v. R. S. HOWARD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIOrIri TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 139 and 113. Argued January 14,
Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Mining Co.
SILVER KING COALITION MINES COMPANY v. CONKLING MINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 158. Petition for rehearing. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. Petition for rehearing treated as a motion for th
Chase v. United States
CHASE, JR., A MINOR, ETC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 242. Argued March 21, 22, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The cession made by the Omaha Indians through the treaties of 1854 a
Wyoming v. United States
STATE OF WYOMING ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued October 6, 7,^ 1920. Decided March 28, 1921. 1. Lands “in place ” granted to a State for the support of schools, and
United States v. Coronado Beach Co.
UNITED STATES v. CORONADO BEACH COMPANY. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Nos. 524, 525. Argued March 1, 2, 1921. Decided March 28, 1921. 1. The fifth section! of the
Payne v. United States ex rel. Newton
PAYNE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 123. Argued December 16, 1920. Decided March 14, 1921. 1. After the lapse of two years from the date of
United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.
UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND COAL & COKE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 87. Argued November 11, 1920. Decided March 7, 1921. 1. The Government'has no equity to. maintain a suit to set aside a fraud
Edward Rutledge Timber Co. v. Farrell
EDWARD RUTLEDGE TIMBER COMPANY ET. AL. v. FARRELL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 172. Argued January 21, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Under the Act of March 2,1899, a lieu selection of unsurveyed
Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.
PAYNE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. v. CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF. COLUMBIA. No. 17. Argued October 6, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. A selection .duly made and perfected by
Bodkin v. Edwards
BODKIN v. EDWARDS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.' No. 495. Motion to dismiss or-affirm submitted December 6, 1920.— Decided February 28, 1921. 1. The court accepts the concurrent findings of the District Co
Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Mining Co.
SILVER KING COALITION MINES COMPANY v. CONKLING MINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO . AND APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 158, 187. Argued January 19, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Monuments prevail ove
Alaska Fish Salting & By-Products Co. v. Smith
ALASKA FISH SALTING & BY-PRODUCTS COMPANY v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION NO. I, OP THE TERRITORY OP ALASKA. No. 166. Argued January 20, 21,1921. Decided January 31, 1921. 1. In imposing license taxes upon the manufacture of
J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United States
J. W. GOLDSMITH, JR.-GRANT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE' UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEbRGIA. No. 214. Argued December 8, 1920. Decided January 17, 1921. 1. Under §3450, Rev. Stats., which decl
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
DUPLEX PRINTING PRESS COMPANY v. DEERING ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS BUSINESS AGENTS OF DISTRICT NO. 15 OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 45. Argued J
National Brake & Electric Co. v. Christensen
NATIONAL BRAKE & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CHRISTENSEN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 111. Argued December 10, 1920. Decided January 3, 1921. 1. When a patent for an invention has been sustained by
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 23. Original. Motion for order on receiver submitted November 15, 1920. Order entered December 6, 1920. Order directing receiver to return certain lands, etc. Up
Haupt v. United States
HAUPT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 85. Argued November 10, 1920. Decided December 6, 1920. Appellant sued to recover a large som of money for the use which Le claimed the Government had made’ óf his patented improv
Sampliner v. Motion Picture Patents Co.
SAMPLINER v. MOTION PICTURE PATENTS COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO .THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 89. Argued November 12, 1920. Decided December 6, 1920. A party who . joins the opposing party in requesting the District
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.