Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Berlin Mills Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
BERLIN MILLS COMPANY v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY. certiorari, to the circuit court of appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued November 15, 1920. Decided December 6, 1920. Patent No. 1,135,351, issued April 13, 1915, to Procter & Gamb
New York Scaffolding Co. v. Chain Belt Co.
NEW YORK SCAFFOLDING COMPANY v. CHAIN BELT COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTE CIRCUIT. No. 23. Argued October 7, 8, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Patent No. 959,008, claims 1 and 3, to Elias H. Hende
New York Scaffolding Co. v. Liebel-Binney Construction Co.
NEW YORK SCAFFOLDING COMPANY v. LIEBEL-BINNEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court op appeals por the THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued October 7, 8, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. The court notices the earlier forms of scaffo
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 27, Original. Orders entered June 7, 1920. Order Instructing Receiver. Upon consideration of the First Report of Frederick A. Delano, Receiver, in the above-enti
Beidler v. United States
BEIDLER v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 260. Argued April 27, 28, 1920. Decided June 7, 1920. Patent No. 1,057,397, granted to George C. Beidler, March 25,' 1913, for an improvement in photographing and developing app
Nadeau v. Union Pacific Railroad
NADEAU ET AL. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 119. Argued January 9, 12, 1920. Decided June 7, 1920. The fact that tracts of land forming parts of the reser
E. W. Bliss Co. v. United States
E. W. BLISS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 240. Argued March 12, 15, 1920. Decided May 17, 1920. Petitioner averred that it granted the Government’s request for permission to purchase from another certain tor
Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker
MECCANO, LIMITED, v. JOHN WANAMAKER, NEW YORK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 187. Argued January 26, 27, 1920. Decided May 17, 1920. A decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals in a suit for infringemen
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. BROWN, EXECUTOR OF LANGE, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 159. Argued January 20, 21, 1920. Decided May 17, 1920. One who, in repudiation of a contract which bi
Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents
ESTATE OF P. D. BECKWITH, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 178. Argued January 23, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The Trade-Mark • Registration Act declares (§ 5) that no ma
Cameron v. United States
CAMERON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 205. Argued January 29, 30, 1920. Decided April 19, 1920. The inclusion of part of a national forest within a monument reserve' under the A
Manners v. Morosco
MANNERS v. MOROSCO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 370. Argued March 2, 1920. Decided March 22, 1920. Plaintiff, a dramatic author, granted defendant the “sole and exclusive license and liberty to pro
Cole v. Ralph
COLE ET AL. v. RALPH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Nos. 172, 173. Argued December 8, 1919. Decided March 15, 1920. Where judgments of the District Court, rendered for the plaintiff on verdicts in certain
Chapman v. Wintroath
CHAPMAN ET AL. v. WINTROATH. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 117. Argued January 9, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. An inventor whose application disclosed but did not claim an invention which is later paten
Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. United States
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 153. Argued January 21, 22, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. In settling with a railroad company under its current contract for mail transportation, the
United States v. A. Schrader's Son, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. A. SCHRADER’S SON, INC. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 567. Argued January 22, 23, 1920. Decided March 1, 1920. A manufacturer of patented articles sold them to its
United States v. Poland
UNITED STATES v. POLAND ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 29. Argued November 19, 1919. — Decided January 5, 1920. A bill to set aside a patent partly because of a false representation, alleged to
Bone v. Commissioners
BONE v. COMMISSIONERS OF MARION COUNTY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 63. Argued November 11, 1919. — Decided December 15, 1919. Patent No. 705,732, (claims 1, 3, 5, 16 and 17,) to Frank A. Bone, fo
United States ex rel. Alaska Smokeless Coal Co. v. Lane
UNITED STATES ON THE RELATION OF ALASKA SMOKELESS COAL COMPANY v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 36. Argued October 14, 1919. Decided November 10, 1919. The Act of Apri
Odell v. F. C. Farnsworth Co.
ODELL v. F. C. FARNSWORTH COMPANY ET AL. APPEAR PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 186. Submitted March 24, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. A suit by a patentee to compel an accounting for ro
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McComas
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. McCOMAS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. No. 172. Argued January 22, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. Lands constituting parts of odd-numbered sections within the primary limits
T. H. Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.
T. H. SYMINGTON COMPANY v. NATIONAL MALLEABLE CASTINGS COMPANY ET AL. MINER v. T. H. SYMINGTON COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the FIRST CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT jOF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. N
Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.
MINERALS SEPARATION, LIMITED, ET AL. v. BUTTE & SUPERIOR MINING COMPANY, DESIGNATED AS BUTTE & SUPERIOR COPPER COMPANY, LIMITED. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 599. Argued March 19, 1919. Decided June
United States v. Reynolds
UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 591. Argued March 4, 5, 1919. Decided May 19, 1919. Under the Allotment Act of February S, 1887, § 5, c. 119,24 Stat. 388, the twenty-five yea
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.