Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1850

Oldfield v. Marriott

Granville S. Oldfield, Plaintiff in error, v. William H. Marriott. The second article of the treaty between the United States and Portugal, made on the 26th of' August, 1840 (8. Stat. at Large, 560), provides as follows, ' viz.: — “ Vessels

51 U.S. 146 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Rhodes v. Steamship Galveston

Ex Parte : In the Matter of Henry W. Rhodes v. The Steamship Galveston, &c. — In Admiralty. •In order to sustain a motion to docket and dismiss a case under the forty-third rule of this court, it is necessary to show, by the certificate of

51 U.S. 144 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1850

Hoyt v. United States

Jesse Hoyt, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. When Treasury transcripts are offered in evidence under the act of March 3, 1797 (1 Stat. at Large, 512), although they are not evidence of the indebtedness of the defendant, as to money

51 U.S. 109 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1850

Downs v. Kissam

Alfred C. Downs, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph Kissam. Where the Circuit Court instructed the jury, “ that, if any one of the mortgages; giv- - en in evidence conveyed more property than would be sufficient to secure the'debt provided for i

51 U.S. 102 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Wilson v. Sandford

James G. Wilson, Appellant, v. George A. Sandford and Robert G. Musgrove. The seventeenth section of the act of 1836 gives the right of appeal to this court, when the sum in dispute is below the value of two thousand dollars, “ in all actio

51 U.S. 99 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1850

Strader v. Graham

Jacob Strader, James Gorman, and John Armstrong, Plaintiffs in error, v. Christopher Graham. Under the 25th section, of the Judiciary Act, this court has no,jurisdiction over the following question, viz. “ Whether slaves who had been permit

51 U.S. 82 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Preston v. Bracken

Sylvester B. Preston, William Kendall, William Nichols, and William T. Phillips, Plaintiffs in error, v. Charles Bracken. This case was decided on the same ground as the preceding case of McNulty v. Batty and others.. This was a writ of err

51 U.S. 81 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1850

McNulty v. Batty

John McNulty, Plaintiff in error, v. John Batty, Robert Shaw, Daniel Wann, and Thomas C. Legate. Where a case had been brought up to this court from the Supreme Court of the Territory of .Wisconsin, and wás pending in this court at the time

51 U.S. 72 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1850

Shelby v. Bacon

Isaac Shelby, Complainant, v. John Bacon, Alexander Symington, Thomas Robins, James Robertson, Richard H. Bayard, James S. Newbold, Herman Cope, Thomas S. Taylor, and George Beach. By a statute of Pennsylvania, passed in 1836, “assignees fo

51 U.S. 56 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1850

Webster v. Cooper

Henry Webster, Plaintiff, v. Peter Cooper. Where it appears- that the whole case has been certified pro forma, in order to take the opinion of this court, without any actual' division of opinion in the Circuit Court, the practice is irregul

51 U.S. 54 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Tayloe v. Merchant's Fire Ins.

Tayloe v. Merchant’s Fire Ins. Co. (p. 390.).

50 U.S. 670 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Lytle v. Arkansas

Lytle et al. v. The State of Arkansas et al. (p. 614.)

50 U.S. 664 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Withers v. Greene

APPENDIX. Br some untoward accident, the following dissentient opinions were omitted in the reports of the cases to which they apply, and are therefore published in an Appendix. Withers v. Greene. (p. 213.)

50 U.S. 661 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1850

Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.

The State of Pennsylvania, Complainant, v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company, William Ottersan, and George Croft. In a -cause depending in this, court in the exercise of original jurisdiction, wherein the State of Pennsylvania complai

50 U.S. 647 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Employment Law 1850

United States v. Southmayd

The United States, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Horace Southmayd and Stephen C. Southmayd. The decision in the preceding case of Marriott v. Brqne affirmed. The fact, that the seller of sugars abroad takes :into consideration the probable-loss f

50 U.S. 637 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Employment Law 1850

Marriott v. Brune

William H. Marriott, Plaintiff in error, v. Frederick W. Brune, John C. Brune, and William H. Brune, Copartners, trading under the Firm of F. W. Brune & Sons. By the eleventh section of the act of Congress passed on the 30th of July, 1846 (

50 U.S. 619 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1850

Fleming v. Page

Joseph Fleming and William A. Marshall, trading under the Firm of Fleming & Marshall, v. James Page, Collector of the United States. During the war between the United States and- Mexico, the port- of Tampico, in the Mexican State of Tamauli

50 U.S. 603 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Hogan v. Ross

Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson. Where no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, the cause - must be dismissed on m

50 U.S. 602 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1850

Baldwin v. Ely

John Baldwin, Appellant, v. Charles Ely. Certificates were issued by the Treasury Department, under a treaty with Mexico, which were payable to a claimant or his assigns upon presentation at the Department. These certificates being legally

50 U.S. 580 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Cotton v. United States

Loftin Cotton, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. In the preceding case of Forsyth v. The United States, this, co.urt decided that the act of Congress passed on the 22d of February, 1847 (Sess. Laws, 1847, chap. 17), gave jurisdictio

50 U.S. 579 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1850

Simpson v. United States

Ezekiel Simpson, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida.

50 U.S. 578 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1850

Forsyth v. United States

Joseph Forsyth, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. The Judiciary Act of 1789 made no provision for the revision, by this court, of judgments of the Circuit or District Courts in criminal cases; and the act of 1802 (2 Stat. at Large,

50 U.S. 571 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1850

United States v. Marigold

The United States, Plaintiffs, v. Peter Marigold. On the 3d of March, 1825, Congress passed an act (4 Stat: at Large, 121) providing for the punishment of persons who shall bring into the United States, with intent to pass, any false, forge

50 U.S. 560 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Lambert v. Ghiselin

Benjamin H. Lambert and Lewis McKenzie, Plaintiffs, v. William Ghiselin. In an action upon a bill of exchange brought by the holder, residing in Alexandria, ' against the indorser, a physician residing in Maryland, the bill upon its face no

50 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion