Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1852

Deacon v. Oliver

John Deacon, Appellant, v. Charles Oliver and Robert M. Gibbes, Executors of Robert Oliver, deceased. Under the attachment laws of Maryland, a share in the Baltimore Mexican Company, which had fitted out an expedition under General Mina, wa

55 U.S. 610 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1852

Goesele v. Bimeler

John G. Goesele and Others, Appellants, v. Joseph M. Bimeler and Others. A society called Separatists, emigrated from Germany to tlie United States. They were very poor, and one of them, in 1817, purchased land in Ohio, for which he gave hi

55 U.S. 589 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1852

Huff v. Hutchinson

Henry D. Huff, John Bullen, and Samuel Hale, Plaintiffs in error, v. Champion J. Hutchinson, who sues for the use of William W. Hurlbut, Joseph A. Sweetzer, Philip Van Valkenburgh, and George S. Phillips. Where the marshal'of the District o

55 U.S. 586 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1852

Walker v. Robbins

William F. Walker and Samuel M. Puckett, Appellants, v. George S. Robbins, Lloyd W. Wells, Abijah Fisher, and Robert H. McCurdy. A bill in chancery will not lie for the purpose of perpetually enjoining a judgment, upon the ground that there

55 U.S. 584 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1852

Boyden v. Burke

Uriah A. Boyden, Plaintiff in error, v. Edmund Burke. Where an action was brought against the Commissioner of Patents for refusing to give copies of papers in his office, and no special damage was set out in the declaration, evidence of the

55 U.S. 575 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1852

Veazie v. Moor

Samuel Veazie and Levi Young, Plaintiffs in error, v. Wyman B. S. Moor. The' River Renobscot is entirely within the State of Maine, from its source to its ■ paouth. Rorthe last eight miles of its course it is not navigable, but crossed by .

55 U.S. 568 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1852

Lessee of Doolittle v. Bryan

Lessee of Irwin H. Doolittle, and Others, Plaintiffs, v. Levi Bryan and Others, Defendants. A sale of land by a marshal on a. venditioni exportas,.after he is removed from office, and a new marshal appointed and qualified, is not void. . Su

55 U.S. 563 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1852

Bloomer v. McQuewan

Elisha Bloomer, Appellant, v. John W. McQuewan, Allen R. McQuewan, and Samuel Douglas, Partners, under the name of McQuewans & Douglas. The patent for Woodworth’s planing machine was extended from 1842 to 1843, bjr the Board of Commissioner

55 U.S. 539 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1852

Stainback v. Rae

L. I. Stainback et al., Claimants of the Ship Washington, her tackle, &c., Appellants, v. William A. Rae, in his own right, and as Administrator of Joseph Porter Wheeler, deceased, and Edmund Crosby, Master, Owners of the Ship Mary Frances,

55 U.S. 532 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

Stephens v. Cady

James Stephens, Appellant, v. Isaac H. Cady. Where the copy-right of a map was taken out under the act of Congress, and the copperplate engraving seized and sold under • an execution, the purchaser did not acquire the right to strike off an

55 U.S. 528 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1852

Jackson v. Hale

John Jackson, Plaintiff in error, v. Samuel Hale, George C. Many, and John V. Ayer. ■Where a warehouseman gave a receipt for wheat which, he did not receive, and after-wards the quantity which he actually had' was divided amongst the respec

55 U.S. 525 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1852

Marsh v. Brooks

Samuel Marsh, William E. Lee, and Edward C. Delavan, Plaintiffs in error, v. Edward Brooks, and Virginia C. his wife, Charles P. Billon, and Francis E. his wife, Walter G. Reddick, and Dabney C. Reddick. This court decided, in 8. Howard, 22

55 U.S. 513 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1852

Sheppard v. Graves

Abram Sheppard and John Duncan, Plaintiffs in error, v. Peyton S. Graves. In this case, as in the preceding, it is decided, that where the plaintiff averred enough to show the jurisdiction of the court and the defendant pleaded in abatement

55 U.S. 512 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Insurance Law 1852

Sheppard v. Graves

Abram Sheppard and John Duncan, Plaintiffs in error, v. Peyton S. Graves. It is a- bad mode of pleading, to unite pleas in abatement -and pleas to the merits. And if after pleas in abatement, a defence be interposed, going to the merits of

55 U.S. 505 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1852

Webster v. Cooper

Henry Webster, Plaintiff in error, v. Peter Cooper. A will, executed in 1777, which devised certain lands in Maine, to trustees Sind their heirs to the use of Richard (the son of the testator) for life, remainder, for his life in case of fo

55 U.S. 488 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1852

Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Derby

The Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company, Plaintiff in error, v. Elias H. Derby. "Where a suit was brought against a railroad company, by a person who was injured by a collision, it was correct in the court to instruct the jury, that,

55 U.S. 468 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

Nutt v. Minor

William D. Nutt, Executor of Alexander Hunter, deceased, Plaintiff in error, v. Philip H. Minor. Where the marshal of the District of Columbia engaged the services pf a clerk for a stipulated sum per annum, and the service continued without

55 U.S. 464 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1852

Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Goddard

The Salmon Falls Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff in error, v. William W. Goddard. The statute of frautUm .Massachusetts, is -substantially, the same as that of_29 Car.' 2, tad declares that no contract for the sale of goods, &c., shall be

55 U.S. 446 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1852

Winder v. Caldwell

William H. Winder, Plaintiff in error, v. Andrew D. Caldwell. Where a scire facias was issued to enforce a lien upon a house under the lien law of the District of Columbia, there was no necessity to file a declaration. Where the contract be

55 U.S. 434 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1852

Ennis v. Smith

John F. Ennis, Administrator de bonis non of Joseph Zolkowski and others, v. J. H. B. Smith, Administrator of George Bomford, Lewis Johnson, Administrator de bonis non of Thaddeus Kosciusko, James Carrico, Samuel Stott, George C. Bomford, J

55 U.S. 400 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1852

Bosley v. Wyatt

Mary Lucinda Bosley, Henry Bosley, Mary Jane Davis, Sally Ann Davis, James Bosley and Meldrid Bosley, (infants,) by their guardian and next friend John Bosley, and John Bosley son of the said John, v. Margaret E. Wyatt, Executrix of Elizabe

55 U.S. 390 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1852

Cunningham v. Ashley

Matthew Cunningham, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary W. W. Ashley, executrix, and sole Legatee of Chester Ashley, deceased, and William E. Ashley, Frances A. Ashley, (now Frances A. Freeman,) and Henry W. Ashley, by Mary W W. Ashley, his guardia

55 U.S. 377 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Employment Law 1852

Peale v. Phipps

Elijah Peale, Trustee of the Agricultural Bank of Mississippi, Plaintiff in error, v. Martha Phipps, and Mary Bowers, wife of Charles Rice. Two statutes of Mississippi, one passed in 1843, and the other in 1846, provide that where the chart

55 U.S. 368 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1852

General Mutual Insurance v. Sherwood

The General Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in error, v. Ebenezer B. Sherwood. Under a policy insuring against tho usual perils of the sea, including barratry, the underwriters are not liable to repay to “the insured, damages paid by.h

55 U.S. 351 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion