Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1852 Cases
55 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brown v. Aspden's Administrators
John A. Brown, Administrator of John Aspden, deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Mathias Aspden’s Administrators, et al. A reargument of a ease decided by tbis court will not be granted,.unless a member of the court, who concurred in the judgm
Ex parte Many
Ex parte William Many. Where there was a blank in the record of the Circuit Court in the taxation of the costs recovered by the plaintiff, and the judgment being affirmed by this Court, a • mandate with the same blank went down to the Circu
Kanouse v. Martin
Cornelius Kanouse, Plaintiff in Error, v. John M. Martin. Where a motion was made, under the 12th section of the Judiciary Act, to remove a cause from a State Court to the Circuit Court of the United States, notwithstanding which the State
Moore v. People
Thomas Moore, Executor of Richard Eels, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of Illinois. A State, under its general and admitted power to define and punish offences against its own peace and policy, may repel from its borders an
Ex parte Taylor
Ex parte David Taylor. A rule will be refused for the judges of the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia to show cause why a -mandamus should not issue, unless a case is presented which prima facie requires the interposition of this co
Wylie v. Coxe
Andrew Wylie, Jr., Administrator of Samuel Baldwin, Appellant, v. Richard S. Coxe. An appeal will not lie to this court from a refusal oLthe court below to open a prior decree, and grant a rehearing. The decision of this point rests entirel
United States v. Harrison
UNITED STATES v. HARRISON. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT DP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. No. 126. Submitted April 21, 1852. Decided April 23, 1852. The evidence and principles decided in this case are the same i
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.