Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a 1852

Hoyt v. Hammekin

Nathaniel Hoyt and James Blandin, Administrators, &c., and the said James Blandin, William M. Hudson, and Josephine, his wife, heirs of Antoine Blandin, deceased, and Elisha M. Pease, Appellants, v. George S. Hammekin, and Adelaide Matilda,

55 U.S. 346 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1852

Harris v. Hardeman

Benjamin D. Harris, Plaintiff in error, v. William Hardeman, Henry R. W. Hill, Cotesworth P. Smith, and Henry A. Moore. A statute of Mississippi directs that where the defendant cannot he found, a writ of . capias ad respondendum shall be s

55 U.S. 334 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

Perkins v. Fourniquet

John Perkins, Appellant, v. Edward P. Fourniquet, and Harriet, his wife. The sixty-second rule of this dourt, (13 Howard,) is as follows: “In cases where a writ of error is prosecuted to the Supreme Court, and the judgment of the inferior c

55 U.S. 328 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Tax Law 1852

Perkins v. Fourniquet

John Perkins, Appellant, v. Edward P. Fourniquet and Harriet, his wife, and Martin Ewing and Anne, his wife. Releases given by the complainants, in the present case, decided to cover, the matters in controversy, and, therefore, to put an en

55 U.S. 313 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

Christy v. Henley

William Christy, Plaintiff in error, v. Hiram Henley.

55 U.S. 297 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

Christy v. Findley

William Christy, Plaintiff in error, v. James D. Findley.

55 U.S. 296 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Tax Law 1852

Christy v. Scott

William Christy, Plaintiff in error, v. William T. Scott; William Christy v. James D. Finley; William Christy v. William Young; William Christy v. Hiram Henly. Iü Texas, the technical forms of pleading, fixed by the common law, are dispense

55 U.S. 282 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Civil Rights 1852

Board of Trustees v. Indiana

The Board of Trustees for the Vincennes University, Plaintiffs in error, v. The State of Indiana. In J 804, Congress passed an act, (2 Stat. at Large, 277,) “making pro vision. for the disposal of the public lands in the Indiana Territory,

55 U.S. 268 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1852

De Lane v. Moore

Philip H. De Lane, John M. Chiles, Martha C. Chiles, John E. Lykes, and Grace A. Lykes, Appellants, v. Andrew B. Moore, and James L. Goree, Executors of James L. Goree, deceased. Where an antenuptial contract was alleged to have been made,

55 U.S. 253 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1852

Downey v. Hicks

James W. Downey, Executor of Samuel S. Downey, deceased, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary M. Hicks, Executrix of Joseph T. Hicks, deceased. Where the declaration, in an action of assumpsit, contained the following counts:— 1. On a promissory not

55 U.S. 240 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Civil Rights 1852

Calkin v. Cocke

E. P. Calkin and Samuel Jones, trading under the Firm and Style of E. P. Calkin and Company, Plaintiffs in error, v. James H. Cocke. The State of Texas was admitted into the Union on the 29th of December, 1845, (9 Stat. at Large, 108.) and

55 U.S. 227 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1852

Silsby v. Foote

Horace C. Silsby, Washburn Race, Abel Downs, Henry Herrion, and Charles D. Thompson, v. Elisha Foote. Upon a trial in New York, a. juror became ill, and was discharged before any evidence Was given, and before the plaintiffs’ counsel had' c

55 U.S. 218 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

United States v. Gusman

The United States, Appellants, v. John Gusman. This, like the preceding case of The United States v. The Heirs of Rillieux, was an appeal f.om the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. .In fact, it was a

55 U.S. 193 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

United States v. Heirs of Rillieux

The United States, Appellants, v. the Heirs of Vincent Rillieux, Deceased. This court again decides, as in 11 Howard, 580, that -under the acts of Congress of 1824 and 1844, the District Court had no power to act upon evidence of mere naked

55 U.S. 189 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1852

Le Roy v. Tatham

Thomas Otis Le Roy, and David Smith, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Benjamin Tatham, Junior, George N. Tatham, and Henry B. Tatham. In a patent for improvements upon the maclunery used for making .pipes and tubes from lead, or tin, when in a set,

55 U.S. 156 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1852

Lawler v. James H.

Davis B. Lawler, Timothy Walker, Stephen S. L’Hommedieu, George Graham, John S. Harrison, and Jacob Burnet, Plaintiffs in Error, v. James H. and John Walker. Where the Supreme Court of a State certified that there was “ drawn in question th

55 U.S. 149 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Family Law 1852

In re Kaine

In re Thomas Kaine, an alleged Fugitive from Great Britain. Under the tenth article of the treaty of 1842. between the United States and Great Britain, a warrant was issued by a commissioner, at the instance of the British Consul, for the a

55 U.S. 103 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1852

Rundle v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Co.

George Rundle and William Griffiths, Trustees of the Estate of John Savage, deceased, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the Delaware and Raritan Canal Company. Bjr tic law of Pennsylvania, the Biver Delaware is a public navigable river, held by its j

55 U.S. 80 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1852

Herman v. Phalen

David B. Herman, Plaintiff in Error, v. James Phalen; Same v. Same. The case of League v- DeYoung and Brown, (11 Howard, 185,) considered and again established. These two cases were brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of th

55 U.S. 79 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1852

Raymond's Lessee v. Longworth

William F. Raymond’s Lessee v. Nicholas Longworth. Tr the State of Ohio, it is not a sufficient description of taxable lands to say, “ Cooper, James, 5-acres, section 24, T. 4,,3?. R. 1.” A deed made in consequence of a sale for taxes under

55 U.S. 76 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1852

Sample v. Barnes

Samuel Sample, Israel W. Pickins, and Burwell Scott, Appellants, v. Shadrach Barnes. Where there was a judgment át law against a defendant in Mississippi, and he sought relief in equity, upon the ground that the consideration of the contrac

55 U.S. 70 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1852

Wiswall v. Sampson

Joseph Wiswall, Plaintiff in Error, v. David Sampson, Lessee of Edward Hall and Edward S. Dargan. Where real estate is in the custody of a receiver, appointed by a court of chancery,' a sale of the property under an execution issued by virt

55 U.S. 52 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1852

Kennett v. Chambers

John Kennett, Ezekiel S. Haines, Eden B. Reeder, George Graham, Jr., John McCarty, Joshua Yorke, and Robert B. Bowler, Appellants, v. Thomas J. Chambers. ,t belongs exclusively to the political department of the government to recognize ór t

55 U.S. 38 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1852

Hagan v. Walker

John Hagan, surviving Partner of the late firm of John Hagan & Co., Appellant, v. Leroy P. Walker, Administrator of William H. Pope, deceased, and Frances Ann Pope, Widow and Guardian ad litem of William Pope and Julia Ann Pope, minor child

55 U.S. 29 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion