Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1853 Cases
82 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Doe v. Braden
John Doe, on the demise of Lot Clark, David Clarkson, Joseph D. Beers, Andrew Talcott, Brantz Mayer, and Harriet Hackley, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph Addison Braden. In the ratification, by tho King of Spain, of the treaty by which Florid
Deshler v. Dodge
John C. Deshler v. George C. Dodge. The eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, says, “nor shall any District or' Circuit Court'have cognizance of any suit to recover the contents of any promissory note or other chose in action, in f
Cervantes v. United States
Cruz Cervantes, Appellant, v. The United States. Upon an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, where it did not appear, from the proceedings, whether the land, claimed was within the No
Early v. Doe
William Early, Plaintiff in error, v. John Doe, on the demise of Rhoda E. Homans. Where the language of the statute was “That public notice of the time and place of ' the sale of real property for taxes due to the corporation of the city of
Early v. Rogers
Samuel H. Early, Plaintiff in error v. John Rogers, junior, and Joseph Rogers, Survivors, &c. of Rogers & Brothers, Defendants. AVhcro a controverted case was, by agreement of the parties, entered settled, and the terms of settlement were,
Calvert v. Bradley
Charles B. Calvert and George H. Calvert, Plaintiffs in error, v. Joseph H. Bradley and Benjamin F. Middleton. Where a lease was made by several owners of a house, reserving rent to each one in proportion to his interest, and there was a co
Slicer ex rel. Slicer v. Bank of Pittsburg
William J. Slicer, Lawrence Slicer, William Cromwell Slicer; and Marcella Slicer, minors, by their Father and next Friend, William J. Slicer, and Martha Virginia Berkley, Jermemiah Berry, and Thomas Cromwell Berry, Appellants, v. The Bank o
Southard v. Russell
Daniel R. Southard, Samuel D. Tompkins, William L. Thompson, Matilda Burks, Joseph R. Tunstall, John Burks, James Burks, Samuel Burks, Charles Burks, and Mary Burks (the four last named by William L. Thompson, their next friend,) v. Gilbert
Barney ex rel. Woodhull v. Saunders
Mary E. Barney, by her next friend Maxwell Woodhull, Appellant, v. David Saunders, Roger C. Weigtman, and Samuel C. Barney. There were two trustees of real and personal estate for the benefit of a minor. One of the trustees was also adminis
Fanning v. Gregoire
Timothy Fanning, Appellant, v. Charles Gregoire and Charles Bogg. In 1838, the Legislature of the Territory of Iowa authorized Panning, his heirs and assigns, to establish and keep a ferry across the Mississippi river, at the town of Dubuqu
Irwin v. United States
James Irwin, Appellant, v. The United States. On 6th November, 1836, W. i\ Hamilton, William V. Robinson, and wife, by d?ed, conveyed to the United States “ the right and privilege to use, divert, and carry away from the fountain spring, by
Guitard v. Stoddard
Joseph Guitard, Frederick Steudeman and Mary his Wife, and George Brown and Julia his Wife, Plaintiffs in error, v. Henry Stoddard. The act of Congress, passed on the 13th of June, 1812, (2 Stat. at Large, 748,) entitled' An act for the set
Amis v. Myers
Henrietta Amis, Executrix, and William Perkins, Executor, of Junius Amis, deceased, Appellants, v. David Myers. Where a complainant filed a bill on ,the equity side of the Circuit Court, for an injunction to prevent the sale of slaves which
Seymour v. McCormick
William H. Seymour and Dayton S. Morgan, Plaintiffs in error, v. Cyrus H. McCormick. In 1834, McCormick obtained a patent for a reaping machine. This patent expired in 1848. In 1845, he obtained a patent for an improvement upon bis patented
The Steamboat New World v. King
The Steamboat New World, Edward Minturn, William Menzie, and William H. Webb, Claimants and Appellants, v. Frederick G. King. Where a libel was filed, claiming compensation for injuries sustained by a passenger in a steamboat, proceeding fr
Gamache v. Piquignot
Louis D. Gamache, Samuel and Leonore Gamache, by Guardian, Wilson Primm, Louis Primm, John Cavenden, and Abby P. True, Plaintiffs in error, v. Francois X. Piquignot, and the Inhabitants of the of the of Carondellet In 1812, Congress passed
Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Debolt
The Ohio Life Insurance and Trust Company, Plaintiff in error, v. Henry Debolt, Treasurer of Hamilton County, Defendant in error. There being no opinion of the court, as such, in this case, the reporter can only state ' the laws of Ohio whi
Piqua Branch of State Bank v. Knoop
The Piqua Branch of the State Bank of Ohio, Plaintiff in error, v. Jacob Knoop, Treasurer of Miami County. In l'845,.the-Legii=latiive of Ohio passed a general banking law, the fifty-ninth section of which required the officers to make semi
Homer v. Brown
Fitz Henry Homer, Plaintiff in error, v. George L. Brown. In April, 1815, William Brown, of Massachusetts, made his will by which he made sundry bequests to his youngest son, Samuel. One of them was of the rent or improvement of the store a
Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Alexander J. Marshall, Plaintiff in error, v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company. A citizen of Virginia may sue the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company in-the Circuit Court of the United States for Maryland, and an averment that the de
Smith v. Swormstedt
William A. Smith and others, v. Leroa Swormstedt and others. In 1844, the Methodist Episcopal Church of the United States, at a General Conference, passed sundry resolutions providing for a distinct, ecclesiastical organization in the slave
Carroll v. Lessee of Carroll
Jane M. Carroll, Plaintiff in error, v. Lessee of George W. Carroll, De Rosz Carroll, Robert D. Carroll, Charles W. Carroll, John M. Martin and America his Wife, and John Ford and Mary his Wife. Bv the. common law of Maryland, lands of whic
Bartlett v. Kane
Edwin Bartlett, Plaintiff in error, v. George P. Kane. By tlie Tariff Act of 1842, the custom-house appraisers are directed to ascertain, estimate and appraise, by all reasonable ways and means in their power, the true and actual market val
Maillard v. Lawrence
Thirion Maillard, Earnest Caylers, and Hamille C. Roumage, Plaintiffs in error, v. Cornelius W. Lawrence. By .the Tariff Act of 1846, a duty of thirty per cent, ad valarm is imposed upon articles included within schedule C; amongst which ar
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.