Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1853

United States v. Dawson

The United States, Plaintiffs, v. James L. Dawson, and John R. Baylor. In June, 1844, Congress passed an act, by virtue of which the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Arkansas, was vested with power to try offences comm

56 U.S. 467 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Corning v. Troy Iron & Nail Factory

Erastus Corning, John F. Winslow, and James Horner, Appellants, v. The Troy Iron and Nail Factory. Where the respondent in a chancery suit in the Circuit Court took two grounds of defence, and the judge, in giving his reasons for a decree d

56 U.S. 451 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Foley v. Harrison

Arthur Morgan Foley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Harrison, Defendant, and Louis Lesassier, Intervenor. la 1841, Congress passed an act (5 Stat. at Large, 455) declaring that there shall be granted to each State, &c., (Louisiana being o

56 U.S. 433 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Den ex dem. Russell v. Ass'n of Jersey Co.

John Den, ex dem. Archibald Russell, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Association of the Jersey Company. The soil under the public navigable waters of East New Jersey belongs to the State and not to the proprietors. This court, so decided in the

56 U.S. 426 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1853

Murray v. Gibson

Hamilton Murray, use, &c., Plaintiff, v. John A. Gibson. A statute of Mississippi, passed in Í846, declares that no record of any judgment recovered in a foreign court against a citizen of that State, shall be received as evidence after the

56 U.S. 421 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Wylie v. Coxe

Andrew Wylie, Jr., Administrator of Samuel Baldwin, Appellant, v. Richard S. Coxe. Where a contract was made with an attorney for the prosecution of a claim against Mexico, for a stipulated proportion of the amount recovered, and services w

56 U.S. 415 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Tax Law 1853

Executors of McDonogh v. Murdoch

The Executors of John McDonogh, deceased, and others, v. Mary Murdoch and others, Heirs of John McDonogh, deceased. McDonogh, a citizen of Louisiana, made a will, in which, after bequeathing certain legacies not involved in the present cont

56 U.S. 367 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1853

Forsyth v. Reynolds

Robert Forsyth, Appellant, v. John Reynolds, Josiah E. McClure, and John McDougall. By two acts, passed in 1820 and 1823, Congress granted a lot in the village of Peoria, In the State of Illinois, to each settler who “had not heretofore rec

56 U.S. 358 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1853

Carter v. Bennett

Farish Carter, Plaintiff in Error, v. Archibald T. Bennett. A person was sued in the- Territorial court of Florida. After the admission of. Florida as a State, the case was transferred to a State court. The defendant appeared, and pleaded.t

56 U.S. 354 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Walworth v. Kneeland

Clinton Walworth, Plaintiff in Error, v. James Kneeland and Hannah his wife, and Frances Cornelia Foster and William Foster, Infants, by their next Friend, James Kneeland. Where a case was decided .in a State court against a'party, who was

56 U.S. 348 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1853

Winans v. Denmead

Ross Winans, Plaintiff in Error, v. Adam, Edward, and Talbot Denmead. A patent was taken out for making the body of A burden railroad car of sheet iron; the upper part being cylindrical, and the lower part in the form of a frustum of a cone

56 U.S. 330 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1853

Anderson v. Bock

Reuben Anderson and Others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Michael Bock. The city of New Orleans sold a lot in the city for a certain sum of money, the payment "of whi h was not exacted, but the interest of it, payable quarterly, remained as a gro

56 U.S. 323 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1853

Curran v. Arkansas

James N. Curran, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Arkansas, The Bank of the State of Arkansas, John M. Ross, Financial Receiver, and David W. Carrol, Bank Attorney. In 1836, the Legislature of Arkansas incorporated a bank with the usual

56 U.S. 304 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1853

Magniac v. Thomson

Hollingsworth Magniac, Daniel Smith Magniac, and William Jardine, late trading under the firm of Magniac & Company, Appellants, v. John R. Thomson. A plaintiff in a judgment having the defendant in execution under a ca. sa., entered into an

56 U.S. 281 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Garrow v. Davis

John Garrow, Thomas Y. How, Jr., James Seymour, and George Miller, Appellants, v. Amos Davis, George M. Pickering, William McCrillis, and Ephraim Paulk. Black, as agent for the owners, contracted to sell a large quantity of land in Maine, w

56 U.S. 272 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1853

Corning v. Burden

Erastus Corning and John F. Winslow, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Peter A. Burden. In a suit brought for an infringement of a patent-right, the defendant ought to bo allowed to give in evidence the patent under which he claims, although junior t

56 U.S. 252 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Personal Injury 1853

Northern Indiana Railroad v. Michigan Central Railroad

The Northern Indiana Railroad Company, and the Board of Commissioners for the Western Division of the Buffalo and Mississippi Railroad, Appellants, v. The Michigan Central Railroad Company. The Michigan Central Railroad Company, established

56 U.S. 233 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Brooks v. Fiske

Artemas L. Brooks, Ignatius Tyler, William W. Woodworth, as Administrator of William Woodworth, deceased, and also as Grantee, and James G. Wilson, Appellants, v. John Fiske and Nicholas G. Norcross, doing business under the firm of Fiske &

56 U.S. 212 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Employment Law 1853

Kanouse v. Martin

Cornelius Kanouse, Plaintiff in Error, v. John M. Martin. Where a citizen of New Jersey was sued in a State court in New York, and filed his petition to remové the case into the Circuit Court of the United States, offering a bond-with suret

56 U.S. 198 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1853

Rockhill v. Hanna

Thomas C. Rockhill, Wade T. Smith, and William P. Rockhill, Plaintiffs, v. Robert Hanna, Asa B. Strong, Edward Heizer, Aaron Aldridge, Robert B. Hanna, David Shields, Thomas Johnson, Jeremiah Johnson, and George Bruce. Three judgments were

56 U.S. 189 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Bevins v. Ramsey

William C. Bevins and Oliver P. Earle, surviving Partners of the firm of Bevins, Earle & Co., Assignees, &c., who sue for the use of Oliver P. Earle, Plaintiffs in Error v. William B. A. Ramsey, Robert Craighead, James P. N. Craighead, Thom

56 U.S. 179 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1853

Bispham v. Price

Charles Bispham, Appellant, v. Eli K. Price, Executor of Joseph Archer, deceased. In the settlement of complicated partnership accounts by means of an arbitrator, Bispham was charged with one half of certain custom-house bonds, which Archer

56 U.S. 162 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Phelps v. Mayer

Elijah Phelps, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Mayer. In order to make a bill of exceptions valid, it must appear by the transcript not only that the instructions were given or refused at the trial, but also that the party who complains of the

56 U.S. 160 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1853

Broome v. United States

James E. Broome, Administrator de bonis non of Arte Macon, deceased, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. The act of Congress, passed on 2d March, 1799, (1 Stat. at Large, 705,) requires the bond given by a collector of the customs to

56 U.S. 143 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion