Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a 1853

Thorp v. Raymond

Cornelius D. Thorp, Plaintiff in error, v. Ardel B. Raymond. The statute of limitations of New York allows ten years within which an action'must be brought by the heirs of a person under disability', after that disability is removed. But th

57 U.S. 247 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1853

Denise v. Ruggles

Augustine Anne Louise Denise, Hyacinth Adda Mayneaud de Paucemont, Countess de Tournon, Seraphine Carpentier, widow of Olivier Louis Martin, Charles Alexander Martin, Jane Mararie Seraphina Martin, and Jaques Francois, Justinian Francois, a

57 U.S. 242 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Chouteau v. Molony

Henry Chouteau, Plaintiff in error, v. Patrick Molony. On the 22d of September, 1788, the tribe of Indians called the Poxes, situated on the west bank of the Mississipi, sold to Julieu Dubuque a permit to work at the mine as long as he shou

57 U.S. 203 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1853

Cross v. Harrison

Alexander Cross, William L. Hobson, and William Hooper, trading under the name and style of Cross, Hobson, & Company, Plaintiffs in error, v. Edward H. Harrison. In tlie war with Mexico, the port of San Francisco was conquered, by the arms

57 U.S. 164 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1853

Stuart v. Maxwell

John Stuart, Joseph Stuart, James Stuart, and William H. Scott, Plaintiffs in error, v. Hugh Maxwell. The twentieth section of the Tariff Act of 1842 provides, that on all articles manufactured from two or more materials, the duty shall be

57 U.S. 150 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1853

Adams v. Law ex rel. Robinson

James Adams, Executor of Thomas Law, deceased, and Henry May, Administrator of Edmund and Thomas Law, Appellants, v. Joseph E. Law, by his next friend, Mary Robinson. In order to act as a super$&ieas upon a decree in chancery, the appeal bo

57 U.S. 144 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1853

Davenport v. Fletcher

Charles Davenport et al., Heirs of John Davenport, deceased, v. F. Fletcher et al. 1. Where the judgment is not properly described in the writ of error; .2. Where the bond is given to a person who is not a party to the judgment; 3. Where th

57 U.S. 142 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Family Law 1853

Stafford v. Union Bank

In the Matter of Josiah S. Stafford and Jeannette Kirkland, his Wife, Appellants, v. The Union Bank of Louisiana. Where an appeal was taken from a decree in chancery, which decree was made by the court below during tile sitting of this cour

57 U.S. 135 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1853

Chapman ex rel. Leavitt v. Smith

Reuben Chapman, Governor, &c., for the use of John B. Leavitt and Rufus Leavitt, Plaintiff in error, v. Alexander Smith, Bolling Hall, Malcolm Smith, and John G. Graham. By the laws of Alabama, where property is taken in execution, if the's

57 U.S. 114 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1853

Robertson v. Coulter

William Robertson, Trustee of the Commercial Bank of Natchez, Plaintiff in error, v. Henry R. Coulter, and James Richards, Executors of Joseph Collins, deceased. In the State of Mississippi, a judgment of forfeiture was rendered against the

57 U.S. 106 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1853

Piquignot v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Pierre Claude Piquignot, Plaintiff in error, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Under the twenty-second section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, this court cannot reverse the judgment of the court below, for error in ruling any plea in abat

57 U.S. 104 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Sizer v. Many

George W. and Henry Sizer, Plaintiffs in error, v. William V. Many. "Where a judgment in a patent case was affirmed by this court with a blank in the record for costs, and the Circuit Court afterwards taxed these costs at a sum less than tw

57 U.S. 98 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

McCabe v. Worthington

Edward H. McCabe, Plaintiff in error, v. Lloyd D. Worthington. The act of Congress, passed on the 3d of March, 1807, (2 St. atL. 440,) declared that all claims to land in Missouri should be void unless notice of the claim should be filed wi

57 U.S. 86 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1853

Fourniquet v. Perkins

Edward P. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W. Ewing and Wife, Appellants, v. John Perkins. Where a case in equity was referred to a Master, which came again before the court upon exceptions to the Masters report, the court had a right to cha

57 U.S. 82 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Pennington v. Gibson

Josias Pennington, Plaintiff in error, v. Lyman Gibson. Whenever the parties to a suit and the subject in controversy between them are within the regular jurisdiction of a court of equity, the decree of that court is to evfeiy intent as bin

57 U.S. 65 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Burgess v. Gray

Saunders Burgess, Plaintiff in error, v. John M. Gray, Thomas Burgess, Jr., Aaron Burgess, Simeon Burgess, James Burgess, Jr., Samuel T. Northcut, alias Northcraft, Silas Husky, Aaron A. Smirl, George Arnold, Austin M. Johnston, George W. O

57 U.S. 48 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Conrad v. Griffey

Frederic D. Conrad, Plaintiff in error v. David Griffey. in 11- Howard, 480, it is said, “Where a witness was examined for the plaintiff, and the defendant offered in evidence declarations which he had made of a contradictory character, and

57 U.S. 38 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Yerger v. Jones

John C. Yerger, Appellant, v. William H. Jones, and Robert S. Brandon, Executors of William Brandon, deceased. Where a person who was acting as guardian to a minor, but without any legal authority, being indebted to the minor, contracted to

57 U.S. 30 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Turner v. Yates

Henry F. Turner, James F. Purvis, and Sterling Thomas, Plaintiffs in error, v. Joseph C. Yates. A bond, with sureties, was executed for the purpose of securing the repayment of certain money advanced for putting up and shipping bacon. Willi

57 U.S. 14 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Estate Planning & Probate 1853

Lewis v. Darling

John H. Lewis, Appellant, v. Sarah Darling. Where a hill in chancery was filed by a legatee against the person who had-married the daughter and residuary devisee of the testator, (there having been no .administration in the United States up

57 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1853

Livingston v. Woodworth

William Livingston and Ebenezer N. Calef, Appellants, v. William W. Woodworth, Administrator of William Woodworth, deceased, James G. Wilson, Artemas L. Brooks, and Ignatius Tyler, Appellees. Where the assignors of. a pateijt-right were joi

56 U.S. 546 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1853

Adams v. Otterback

James Adams, Plaintiff in Error, v. Philip Otterback. Where a note was given, in the District of Columbia oft the 11th of March, payable sixty days after date, and notice-of its non-payment -was'given to the indorser on the'15th of May) (be

56 U.S. 539 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Delauriere v. Emison

Auguste F. Delauriere, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas Emison. The several nets of Congress, passed in relation to claims to land in Missouri, under Spanish concessions, reserved such lands from sale from time to time. But there was an interm

56 U.S. 525 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1853

Kearney v. Taylor

Thomas Kearney, Thomas Jordan, and Catherine his wife, Anastasia K. Thomas, Anne E. K. Cheeseborough, and Horatio N. Kearney, Appellants, v. John I. Taylor and others. Where land was sold in New Jersey by order of the Orphars Court of one o

56 U.S. 494 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion