Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1859 Cases
115 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Luco v. United States
Juan M. Luco and Jose Leandro Luco, Appellants, v. the United States. A grant of land in California, purporting to have been made to one Jose de la Bosa, dated 4th of December; 18415, and purporting to be signed by Pio Pico as acting Govern
Alabama v. Georgia
The State of Alabama, Complainant, v. the State of Georgia. The boundary line between the States of Georgia and Alabama depends upon the construction of the following words of the contract of cession between the United States and Georgia, d
Gridley v. Westbrook
Ruel Gridley, Clarissa H. Beebe, Sarah P. Snyder, and Charles Snyder, and others, Appellants, v. Edwin S. Westbrook and James P. Guager. Where proceedings are instituted in the State court of Iowa under certain articles of their code, and t
Gridley v. Wynant
Ruel C. Gridley, Clarissa H. Beebe, Sarah P. Snyder, and Charles Snyder, and others, Appellants, v. David Wynant. Where a married woman became a trustee of land for the' benefit of her son- in law, and executed a deed (without joining her h
United States v. Widow & Heirs of Berreyesa
The United States, Appellants, v. the Widow and Heirs of Jose E. Berreyesa, deceased. A decree of tbe District Court affirmed, in a case where the genuineness of the grant of land in California and the fulfilment of its conditions are estab
Yontz v. United States
John Yontz, Administrator of Jose Dolores Pacheco, deceased, Appellant, v. the United States. Where a grant of land in California had this clause, viz: “ The tract of which grant is made is of the extent mentioned in the plan, which goes wi
Morewood v. Enequist
George B. Morewood, John R. Morewood, and Frederic R. Routh, Appellants, v. Lorenzo N. Enequist, owner of the Brig Gothland. The admiralty j uriadiction of the courts of the United States extends to contracts of charter-party and afífeightm
Mayor of New York v. Ransom
The Mayor, Aldermen, and Commonalty, of the City of New York, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Franklin Ransom and Uzziah Wenman. In an action for; damages for the infringement of a patent right, the plaintiff must furnish some data by which the jur
Green v. Custard
Thomas J. Green, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Custard. Where the Circuit Court of the United States has jurisdiction over the parties and cause of action, by virtue of the 12th section of the judiciary act, it cannot be affected by any am
Clifton v. Sheldon
John Clifton, Claimant of the Brig Water Witch, her Tackle, &c., Appellant, v. William H. Sheldon. Where a decree was made by the Circuit Court, sitting in admiralty, that two persons should pay freight, one in the sum of $583.84, and the o
Callan v. Statham
John F. Callan and Michael P. Callan, Appellants, v. Charles W. Statham and others. Where a bill in chancery was filed to set aside a deed as being fraudulent against creditors, and it is charged in the bill that the consideration mentioned
United States v. Murphy
The United States, Appellants, v. James Murphy. The United States, Appellants, v. Emanuel Pratt. This court again decides'that a claim to land in California, founded upon “.Sutter’s general title,” is net valid. These two cases were appeals
Very v. Watkins
Martin Very, Plaintiff in Error, v. George C. Watkins. Where a surety upon a bond is sued, a conversation between his co-surety (now dead) and a third person is not admissible in evidence for the purpose of fixing a liability upon the defen
United States v. Castillero
The United States, Appellants, v. Andres Castillero. By a special dispatch from the Minister of the Interior, under the order of the Mexican President, dated 20th July, 1838, the Governor'of California, with the concurrence of the Departmen
Doe ex dem. Mann v. Wilson
John Doe, ex dem. Curtis Mann and Dolphus Hannah, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William Wilson. In a treaty made with, the Pottawatomie' Indians in 1832, there were reservations to individual Indians, which should be selected under the direction
Jenkins v. Banning
Charles E. Jenkins, Moses Kneeland, and Jackson Hadley, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William S. Banning. Where a case is brought up to this court, and the writ of error appears to have been sued out for delay, the judgment will be affirmod with
Whitridge v. Dill
Thomas Whitridge and others, Claimants of the Schooner Fannie Crocker, Appellants, v. Joshua Dill and others. In a collision which took place between two schooners in the Chesapeake bay, the colliding vessel, being the larger, and fastest s
Frederickson v. Louisiana
Frederick Frederickson, Agent for Caroline, Widow Plaefflin, and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the State of Louisiana. The following is an article of a treaty concluded between the King ofWurtemberg and the United States in 1844, (8 Stat.
Bell v. Mayor of Vicksburg
Thomas Bell, Plaintiff in Error, v. the Mayor and Council of the City of Vicksburg The statutes of Mississippi provide that no plea of non. est factum, shall be admitted or received, unless the truth thereof shall be proved by oath or affir
Castro v. Hendricks
Salvador Castro, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Hendricks, Commissioner of the General Land Office. Where there were 'two' separate claimants of land in California, both claiming under one original grant, and the surveyor, in running out their lin
Minturn v. Larue
Edward Minturn, Complainant and Appellant, v. James B. Larue, Carlisle P. Patterson, and John R. Fouratt. The charter of the town (now city) of Oakland, in California, which conferred upon the corporation power to regulate ferries, did not
Bliven v. New England Screw Co.
Charles Bliven and Edward B. Mead, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the New England Screw Company. Where the screw company sued persons who had received the manufactured articles, and the defence was, that the whole amount which had been ordered had
Bliven v. New England Screw Co.
Charles Bliven and Edward B. Mead, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the New England Screw Company. Where there was a company incorporated for the purpose of making screws, and they were sued by certain persons with whom they had been in the habit of
Sun Mutual Insurance v. Wright ex rel. Maxwell, Wright, & Co.
The Sun Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. John S. Wright, use of Maxwell, Wright, & Co. The principles with respect to a policy of insurance in the preceding case of the Orient Mutual Insurance Company against Wright, reaffir
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.