Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1859 Cases
115 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Flowers v. Foreman
Charles Flowers, survivor of Alice Flowers, Plaintiff in Error, v. Francis Foreman, surviving Partner of Christian Keller, Defendant. Where a party residing,iú~ Maryland sold land in Louisiana with a general warranty to a resident of Louisi
Pennock v. Coe
Joseph Pennock and Nathan F. Hart, Appellants, v. George S. Coe, Trustee of the Cleveland, Zanesville, and Cincinnati Railroad Company. A railroad company authorized to borrow money and issue their bonds; to ena ble themselves to finish and
Cage v. Cassidy
Albert Cage and Henry Hays, Executors of Robert H Cage, deceased, v. Alexander A. Cassidy, William E. Douglass, and William H. Hall, citizens of the State of Tennessee, and Richard Griffith, Marshal of the Southern District of Mississippi.
Green's Administratrix v. Creighton
Daniel Green’s Administratrix v. Fletcher Creighton, in his own right, and as Executor of Jonathan McCaleb deceased. The courts of the United States, as courts of equity, have jurisdiction over ex ecutors and administr'atoi's, where the par
Dubuque & Pacific Railroad v. Litchfield
The Dubuque and Pacific Railroad Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Edwin C. Litchfield. On the 8th of August, 1846, a grant of land was made to the Territory of Iowa, for the purpose of aiding said Territory to improve the navigation of the
Oelricks v. Ford
Henry Oelricks and Gustav W. Lurman, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Benjamin Ford. Where there was a written contract for the delivery of a certain number of barrels of flour at a given price, to be delivered within a named time at the seller’s op
Middleton v. McGrew
Reuben Middleton, Plaintiff in Error, v. William McGrew. The alien heirs of a colonist in Texas, who died intestate in 1835, cannot inherit his landed property there. The courts of Texas have so decided, and this court adopts their decision
Richardson v. Goddard
Charles Richardson and others, Claimants of the Barque Tangier, Appellants, v. David Goddard and others. The general rules which regulate the delivery of goods by a carrier, by land or ' water, explained. Where the master of a vessel delive
Lawrence v. Tucker
Andrew Lawrence, Complainant and Appellant, v. Hiram A. Tucker. Where a mortgage was given to secure the payment of a note for $5,500, and such advances as there had been or might be made within two years, not to exceed in all an indebtment
Teese v. Huntingdon
Lewis Teese and Lewis Teese, Jun., Plaintiffs in Error, v. C. P. Huntingdon and Mark Hopkins. Counsel fees are not a proper element for the consideration of the jury in the estimation of damages in actions for the infringement of a patent r
Anson, Bangs, & Co. v. Blue Ridge Railroad
Anson, Bangs, & Co., v. the Blue Ridge Railroad Company. Wliere a motion was made to dismiss an appeal, upon the ground that no appeal bond had been given, time was allowed the appellants within which to file the bond. If they complied with
Kilbourne v. State Savings Institution
Edward Kilbourne and others v. the State Savings Institution of St. Louis, in the State of Missouri. Where no question was raised upon the trial of the case in the court below for-the consideration- of this court, nor did the plaintiff in e
Howland v. Greenway
John Howland, Samuel Meeker, John Chadwick, and Oliver S. Halstead, Jun., Claimants of the Barque Griffin, her Tackle, &c., Appellants, v. John Greenway and George S. Dickson, Libellants. The regulations at the port ol' Kio Janeiro require
Adams v. Preston
Mary Fort Adams, Administratrix of John Hagan, Jun., DECEASED, APPELLANT, v. JOHN S. PRESTON AND CAROLINE M. Preston his Wife. This court has never reviewed the judgment of ah inferior court of a State, where there was an appeal to the Supr
New York & Baltimore Transportation Co. v. Philadelphia & Savannah Steam Navigation Co.
The New York and Baltimore Transportation Company, Appellants, v. the Philadelphia and Savannah Steam Navigation Company, Owners of the Steamship Keystone State. In a collision which took place in the river Delaware, between a steamship and
Fuentes v. United States
Jose Maria Fuentes v. the United States. A petition was presented to the board of commissioners in California, claiming the confirmation of a title to land, which petition alleged— 1. that a grant had been issued by Micheltorena, and delive
Dalton v. United States
Henry Dalton, Appellant, v. the United States. Where the objection to a grant of land in California was, that the grantee was a foreigner, and therefore not entitled to hold land, this court is of the opinion that the testimony of conversat
Thompson v. Roe
Emma B. C. Thompson and William G. W. White, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Richard Roe, ex dem Jane Carroll, Maria C. Fitzhugh, Anne C. Carroll, Sarah Nicholson, Rebecca Carroll, Henry May Brent, Daniel H. Fitzhugh and Catharine D. his Wife, Devi
United States v. Vallejo
The United States, Appellants, v. Mariano G. Vallejo. Where neither the grant of laud in California, nor the certificate of approval by the Departmental Assembly, are found among the Mexican archives, nor the record of them upon any book of
United States v. Pico
The United States, Appellants, v. Andres Pico. Where the preliminary proceedings to a grant of land in California were not produced, and the grant and certificate of approval came from, the hands of the claimants, no record of them being fo
United States v. Teschmaker
The United States, Appellants, v. Henry F. Teschmaker, Joseph P. Thompson, George H. Howard, and Julius K. Rose. Where none of the preliminary steps required by the act of 1824 and regulations of 1828 have been observed or shown, as there r
Ogilvie v. Knox Insurance
Adam Ogilvie and others, Appellants, v. the Knox Insurance Company, Levi Sparks, and others. In a bill by judgment creditors against an incorporated insurance company and its stockholders, to compel the latter to pay up the' balance due on
Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners
William H. Aspinwall, Joseph W. Alsop, Henry Chauncey, Charles Could, and Samuel L. M. Barbour, Plaintiffs, v. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Daviess The charter of the Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Company, passed by the Leg i
Jeter v. Hewitt
John P. Jeter, Plaintiff in Error, v. James Hewitt, Melville Heron, and Mary Conrad. Where e mortgage of land and slaves, in Louisiana, vas made to the Bank of Louisiana, the property sold in the manner pointed out by the charter of the ban
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.