Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1859 Cases
115 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Orient Mutual Insurance v. Wright ex rel. Maxwell, Wright, & Co.
The Orient Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. John S. Wright, use of Maxwell, Wright, & Company. An open or running policy of insurance upon “ coffee laden or to be laden on board tbe good vessel or vessels from Bio Janeiro to
Zabriskie v. Cleveland, Columbus, & Cincinnati Railroad
Christian A. Zabriskie, Appellant, v. the Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati Railroad Company, and John A. Butler, and others. In 1851, the Legislature uof Ohio passed a general law relating to railway companies, which empowered them at an
Wiseman v. Chiappella
William Wiseman, Plaintiff in Error, v. Achille Chiappella. Where the notarial protest of a bill of exchange stated that the bill had been handed to him on the day it was due, that he went several times to the office of the acceptors of it
Adams v. Norris
Edwin G. Adams, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel Norris. In California, where a will with its codicils was offered in evidence, the testator of which died in 1848, an objection to its admission because it had never been admitted to probate was
United States v. Bolton
The United States, Appellants, v. James R. Bolton. Where a claimant of land in California produced as evidence of his title a grant, dated-on...the 10th February, 1846, made by Pio Pico, ‘‘first member of the Assembly of the Department of t
United States v. Gomez
The United States, Appellants, v. Vicente P. Gomez. When this court is satisfied, from the evidence before it, that no appeal to it had been granted- by the court below, and that the cause was not before it when an prder was passed, at the.
United States v. Pico
The United States, Appellants, v. Francisco Pico and others. Where the archives of California show that a petition for land was presented to the justice of the peace and military commandant at New Helvetia in 1846; that a favorable report w
Sutton v. Bancroft
William B. Sutton, Samuel L. Griffith, and James Sutton, Copartners under the Firm and Style of Sutton, Griffith, & Co., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Stacy B. Bancroft, Thomas Beaver, and others, Copartners under the Firm and Style of Bancroft,
United States v. Alviso
The United States, Appellants, v. Jose Antonio Alviso. Where proceedings for a grant of land in California were commenced by a Mexican in 1838, and continued from time to time and the claimant has been in possession since 1840, and no suspi
United States v. Noe
The United States, Appellants, v. James Noe. Where a grant of land in California? was inade in 1841, under the colonization laws; which looked to the settlement and improvement of the country, and eleven years elapsed, during which time the
Day v. Washburn
George W. Day, Bowen Matlock, Isaac H. Frothingham, and George W. Warner, Appellants, v. William A. Washburn and John A. Keith. Where a motion was made to dismiss an appeal, upon the ground that the appeal was taken by part only of the comp
Haney v. Baltimore Steam Packet Co.
Benjamin Haney, Charles Ogden, and John Trenchard, Libellants and Appellants, v. the Baltimore Steam Packet Company, Owners of the Steamer Louisiana, and George W. Russell. In a collision which took place in the Chesapeake oay between a ste
United States v. Osio
The United States, Appellants, v. Antonio Maria Osio. Where an island in the bay o'f San Francisco, in California, was claimed, not under the colonization law of 1824, or-the regulations of 1828, but under certain special orders issued to t
United States v. Rose
The United States, Appellants, v. John Rose and George Kinlock. Sutter’s general title to lands in California again examined, together with the ' historical events which'preceded and attended it. The court again decides that claims under th
United States v. Bennitz
The United States, Appellants, v. William Bennitz. The general title of Sutter to land in California again decided to convey no valid . title. This was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of Cali
United States v. White
The United States, Appellants, v. Ellen E. White, Administratrix of Charles White, deceased. Where two persons appear to have conflicting claims to land in California, and the United States do not appear to have any interest in the matter,
Hooper v. Scheimer
Nathan E. Hooper, Louisa J. Hooper, and Amanda E. Hooper, Minors, by Absalom Fowler, their next friend, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Jacob Scheimer. It is the settled doctrine of this court, that no action of ejectment will lie on an entry made
Dermott v. Jones
Ann R. Dermott, Plaintiff in Error, v. Zepheniah Jones. Where there was a special contract to build a house by a certain day, which was not fulfilled, owing to various circumstances, and the.contractor brought a suit setting forth the speci
Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre de Grace Steam Towboat Co.
The Philadelphia, Wilmington, and Baltimore Railroad Company, Appellants, v. the Philadelphia and Havre de Grace Steam Towboat Company. The jurisdiction of courts of admiralty in torts depends entirely on localit’ , and this court have here
Beaubien v. Beaubien
John Baptiste Beaubien and others, Complainants and Appellants, v. Antoine Beaubien and others, Defendants. Where a bill in chancery was filed by persons residing in Canada, claiming title to property in Detroit which had been in the exclus
Castle v. Bullard
Edward H. Castle, Elihu Granger, and J. P. Phillips, survivors of Joseph Filkins, deceased, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Edward F. Bullard. The Circuit Courts of the United States.have no power to grant a peremptorynonsuit against the will of th
Irvine v. Redfield
Samuel Irvine and Peter Forbes, Plaintiffs, v. Herman J. Redfield, late Collector of the Customs of the United States at the Port of New York. The duties upon foreign merchandise are to be computed on their value on the day of the sailing o
Ogden v. Parsons
David Ogden, Appellant, v. Jotham Parsons, John A. McGraw, Joshua Atkins, Edwin Atkins, and Joshua Atkins, Jun. Where a charter-party stipulated that a vessel should receive-a full cargo, the opinions of.experts are the best criteria of how
Benjamin v. Hillard
Simeon Benjamin, Plaintiff in Error, v. Oliver B. Hillard and Moses C. Mordecai. Where there was a contract for furnishing a steam engine, the following guar anty was made: “ Por value received, I hereby guaranty the performance of the with
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.