Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1871 Cases
158 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Russell
Ex parte Russell. 1. The words “ final disposition ” in the 2d section of the act of June 25th, 1868, allowing the Court of Claims ” at any time while any suit or claim is pending before or on appeal from the said court, or within two years
Osborn v. Nicholson
Osborn v. Nicholson et al. A person in Arkansas, one of the late slaveholding States, for a valuable consideration, passed in March, 1861, before the rebellion had broken out, sold a negro slave which he then had, warranting “ the said negr
White v. Hart
White v. Hart. 1. The Constitution adopted by Georgia, A.D. 1868, by which it was provided that no court or officer shall have, nor shall the General Assembly give, jurisdiction to try, or give judgment on, or enforce any debt, the consider
United States v. Kimbal
United States v. Kimbal. 1. A marginal note put by the Quartermaster’s Department on bills of lading of vessels chartered by/them, “that if on the arrival of tha vessel at the port of destination the consignee should order her to another pl
Pugh v. United States
Pugh v. United States. A petition to the Court of Claims setting forth— First. That the United States, during the late civil war, illegally, violently, and forcibly took possession of the petitioner’s plantation, in one of the rebellious St
United States v. Russell
United States v. Russell. 1. "Where the government, in emergencies, takes private property into its use, a contract to reimburse the owner is implied. 2. The United States having, under a military emergency, during the rebellion, taken into
Insurance Co. v. Bailey
Insurance Company v. Bailey. Although equity have power to order the delivery up and cancellation of a policy of insurance obtained on fraudulent representations and suppressions of facts, yet it will not generally do so, when these represe
Paige v. Banks
Paige v. Banks. 1. Where in consideration of an agreement by publishers to pay him a certain sum of money, nnd the performance of specified duties in connection with the publication, a reporter of judicial decisions agreed in 1828 “ to furn
Dooley v. Smith
Dooley v. Smith. 1. A plea which states that the sum due on a promissory note is a certain amount, on a certain day, and avers a tender on that day of the sum. due in legal tender notes of the United States, is a good plea of tender. 2 In a
Insurance Co. v. Barton
Insurance Company v. Barton. The granting or refusing to grant a motion for a new trial resting wholly in the discretion of the court where it is made, the action of such court is not ground for error. Error to the Circuit Court for the Dis
Mason v. Rollins
Mason v. Rollins et al. Three appeals in equity against collectors and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue dismissed, the pleadings not showing the citizenship required by the Judiciary Act; and the bills having been all filed subsequently
Blyew v. United States
Blyew et al. v. United States. Under the act of 9th April, 1866 (14 Stat. at Large, 27), sometimes called “The Civil Rights Bill,” -which gives jurisdiction to the Circuit Court of all causes, civil and criminal, affecting persons who are d
Twenty Per Cent. Cases
Twenty Per Cent. Cases. Under the joint resolution of February 28th, 1867, increasing by 20 per cent, the pay of employes in the Department of the Interior, &e., and in the office of the Capitol and Treasury Extension and Commissioner of Pu
Stockwell v. United States
Stockwell v. United States. 1. The second section of the act of March 3d, 1823, amendatory of the act regulating the entry of merchandise imported into the United States from any adjacent Territory (3 Stat. at Large, 781), enacts: “That if
Commonwealth v. Boutwell
Commonwealth v. Boutwell. Mandamus to the Secretary of the Treasury to compel him to deliver a warrant under the act of July 27th, 1861, directing him to refund to the governor of any State the expenses properly incurred in raising troops t
Railroad Co. v. Soutter
Railroad Company v. Soutter et al. A railroad belonging to an incorporated company, and then under a first and second mortgage, was sold on execution and bought in by certain bondholders, whom the second or junior mortgage was given to secu
French v. Edwards
French v. Edwards et al. 1. Statutory requirements intended for the guide of officers in the conduct of business devolved upon them and designed to secure order, system, and dispatch in proceedings, and by a disregard of which the rights of
Chew v. Brumagen
Chew v. Brumagen. 1. The assignee of a bond and mortgage who by the terms of the assignment holds it as collateral security for the payment of another debt, may under the 111th and 113th sections of the New York Code of Procedure sue, witho
Carpentier v. Montgomery
Carpentier v. Montgomery et al. 1. Where a Spanish or Mexican grant of lands in California does not identify the precise tract of land granted, either by description or by reference, the title is an imperfect one, needing the further action
The Ariadne
The Ariadne. 1. The obligation of a “ lookout ” on vessels sailing, in crowded waters such as the bay of New York, is of the highest kind. His cure must be indefatigable; his vigilance sleepless; and the rigor of the requirement rises accor
Caujolle v. Ferrié
Caujolle v. Ferrié. A grant of letters of administration by a court having sole and exclusive power of granting them, and >vhich by statute is obliged to grant them “to the relatives of the deceased, who would be entitled to succeed to his
Butler v. Watkins
Butler v. Watkins. I. On a suit for damages by a patentee against a British corporation and its “managing agent,” sent to this country, in having been fraudulently pretending in a series of negotiations to conclude an agreement with him, th
Tucker v. Spalding
Tucker v. Spalding. 1. In an action at law, where a patent of prior date is offered in evidence as covering the invention described in the plaintiff's patent, on a charge of infringement, the question of the identity of the two instruments
United States v. Vigil
United States v. Vigil. The Departmental Assemblies had no power under the laws of Mexico regu lating the disposition of the public domain, to give it away, either with or without the assent of the governor, except for the purposes of settl
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.