Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1874 Cases
197 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ross v. Jones
Ross, Administrator, v. Jones. 1. The late civil war was flagrant in Arkansas from April, 1861, till April, 1866, and the statutes of limitation did not run during that term. This principle applies to suits between persons in different Stat
Tucker v. Ferguson
Tucker v. Ferguson et al. 1. Congress, by act of 1857, granted public lands to a State, to be “ held” by it, to aid in the construction of a railroad through the State, the road, when made, to be and remain a public highway for the use of t
Robinson v. Elliott
Robinson et al. v. Elliott. 1. Under the Statute of Frauds in Indiana, which enacts in. “Section 10. That no assignment of goods by way of mortgage shall bé valid against any other person than the parties thereto, when such goods are not de
Piatt's Administrator v. United States
Piatt’s Administrator v. United States. Where a contractor has large claims on different accounts against the United States, and the United States have a counter claim of fixed though of much less amount against him, and arrest him and put
United States v. Saunders
United States v. Saunders. 1 A. statute 5s to be interpreted not only by its exact words, but also by its apparent general purpose. If its general purpose have plain reference to one class of persons, it will not include a single individual
Taylor v. Thomas
Taylor v. Thomas. After the late rebellion in the Southern States had broken out into war, and the government had blockaded all the Southern ports so as to prevent the shipment of tho staples of the South, including especially cotton, from
Hunnewell v. Cass County
Hunnewell v. Cass County. 1. Under the act of July 2d, 1864 (13 Stat. at Large, 364), which gave to the Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company every alternate section of the public lands, to the amount of ten alternate sections per
Railway Co. v. McShane
Railway Company v. McShane et al. 1. The Railway Company v. Prescott (16 Wallace, 603) modified and overruled so far as it asserts the contingent right of pre-emption in lands granted to the Pacific Railroad Company, to constitute an exempt
Fox v. Seal
Fox v. Seal. 1. Under, the joint resolution of the legislature of Pennsylvania, passed January 21st, 1843, and which declares that
United States v. Farragut
United States v. Farragut. Captors (Admiral Farragut and others) having filed a libel in the admiralty for prizes taken below New Orleans in April, 1862, they and the government agreed to refer the cause to the “final determination and awar
Amsinck v. Bean
Amsinck v. Bean, Assignee. 1. The assignee in bankruptcy of the estate of an individual partner of a debtor copartnership, cannot maintain a suit to recover back money previously paid to a creditor of the copartnership, upon the ground that
Morgan v. Campbell
Morgan v. Campbell, Assignee. 1. Under tbe Landlord and Tenant Act of Illinois, which enacts in its seventh section that— “In all cases of distress for rent it shall be lawful for tbe landlord, by himself, his agent, or attorney,- to seize
Woodson v. Murdock
Woodson v. Murdock et al. 1. The provision of the constitution of Missouri, which ordains— “ The General Assembly shall have no powor, for any purpose whatever, to release tho lien hold by the State upon any railroad — ” a provision having
Railroad Co. v. Pollard
Railroad Company v. Pollard. 1. Stokes v. Saltonstall (13 Peters, 181) affirmed; and on a suit for injury to person, against a railway company carrying passengers, the doctrine again declared to be that if the passenger is in the exercise o
Stephen v. Beall
Stephen v. Beall et ux. 1. Where one of four joint tenants makes a deed of trust (a mortgage) of land conveyed to the four — the deed of trust purporting to convey the whole estate — it is not necessary, on a bill filed to have the land sol
Railway Co. v. Ramsey
Railway Company v. Ramsey. Although consent of the parties to a suit cannot give jurisdiction to the courts of the United States, the parties may admit the existence of facts which show jurisdiction, and the courts may act judicially upon s
Gavinzel v. Crump
Gavinzel v. Crump. In November, 1863, during the rebellion, Confederate notes being then scmuch depressed in market value that in Kichmond, Virginia, $3260 of them were worth but $204 in gold coin, G., a Swiss, at the time resident in Kichm
Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. Union Bank
Mechanics’ and Traders’ Bank v. Union Bank. 1. The Constitution did not prohibit the creation by military authority of courts for the trial of civil causes during the civil war in conquered portions of the insurgent States. The establishmen
Hampton v. Rouse
Hampton v. Rouse. 1. Under a statute which enacts that the “owner,” may within a time named, redeem land sold for taxes, a redemption may properly be made by a person who has been decreed a bankrupt, the lands having been his. In the case h
Connoyer v. Schaeffer
Connoyer et al. v. Schaeffer. 1. Under proceedings before the boards of commissioners appointed under the act of March 2d, 1805, for ascertaining and adjusting the claims to land embraced in the Louisiana purchase, and the several subsequen
French v. Hay
French, Trustee, v. Hay. When, in a case which is properly removed from a State court, under one of the acts of Congress relating to removals, into the Circuit Court of the United States, a complainant getting a decree in the State court an
French v. Hay
French, Trustee, v. Hay et al. 1. A. filed a bill against B., a purchaser of property at a sale made by O., a trustee to sell, charging both B. nnd-C. with collusion and fraud in the sale, and praying discovery from both parties, that the s
French v. Hay
French v. Hay. In 1859 A. lent to B„, who was largely interested in an embarrassed railroad, $5000 to buy certain judgments against the road, and B. having bought, in 1859 and the early part of 1860, judgments to the amount of $31,000, assi
Bailey v. Magwire
Bailey v. Magwire, Collector. 1. A claim of exemption from county and municipal taxation cannot be supported, any more than a claim from State taxation, except upon language so strong as that, fairly interpreted, no room is left for controv
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.