Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1874 Cases
197 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sweeney v. Lomme
Sweeney et al. v. Lomme. 1. In a suit on a replevin bond given to the sheriff, whore the question whether the proper party to sue is the sheriff or the party for whose benefit the bond was given, depends upon the code of practice of Montana
Fretz v. Stover
Fretz v. Stover. 1. The point eannot be first made in this court that no replication has been made to an answer in chancery, and, therefore, that the answer is to be taken as conclusively true in all points. If such a point is meant to bo i
Elgee Cotton Cases
The Elgee Cotton Cases. 1. On the 31st of July, 1863, during the late rebellion, E. and C., owning certain crops of cotton in Wilkinson County, Mississippi, executed a paper thus: “We have, this 31st of July, 1863, sold unto Mr. L. our crop
Burnhisel v. Firman
Burnhisel v. Firman, Assignee. 1. Where a party agrees, by note, to pay a certain sum at the expiration of a year, with interest on it at a rate named, the rate being higher than the customary one of the State or Territory where he lives, a
In re Chiles
In re Chiles. 1. In the original decree in the case of Texas v. White $ Chiles (7 Wallace, 700), the defendants were perpetually enjoined from setting up any claim or title to any of the bonds, or coupons attached to them, which were the su
Sloan v. Lewis
Sloan v. Lewis. 1. Under the thirty-ninth section of the Bankrupt Act, enacting that a person may, in certain events, be decreed a bankrupt, against his will, “ on tbe petition of one or more of his creditors the aggregate of whose debts pr
St. John v. Erie Railway Co.
St. John v. Erie Railway Company. A railroad company, built originally with money contributed as stock, subsequently borrowed money, issuing its bonds at five several dates and giving five several mortgages to secure tbem. It also borrowed
Railroad Co. v. Pratt
Railroad Company v. Pratt. 1. Though where goods received at one place are to be transported over several distinct lines of road to another and distant one, the liability of the common carrier first receiving them (where no special contract
Pleasants v. Fant
Pleasants v. Fant. 1. Where the question before the jury is whether F. (the defendant) was a partner with K., so as to make him liable for the debts of the firm, K.’s declarations to third persons are not admissible in favor of the plaintif
Maryland v. Railroad Co.
Maryland v. Railroad Company. 1. Although since the legal tender acts, an undertaking to pay in gold may be implied, and be as obligatory as if made in express words, yet the implication must be found in the language of the contract, and ca
United States v. Insurance Companies
United States v. Insurance Companies. 1. Corporations created by the legislature of a rebel State while the State was in armed rebellion against the government of the United States, have power since the suppression of the rebellion, to sue
Haycraft v. United States
Haycraft v. United States. Under the act of March 12th, 1863, relating to captured and abandoned property, and which enacted that any person claiming to bo the owner of such property may, “ at any time within two years after the suppression
Maxwell v. Stewart
Maxwell v. Stewart. 1. To make a record of a judgment valid upon its face, it is only necessary for it to appear that the court had jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action and of the parties, and that a judgment had in fact been re
Ritchie v. Franklin County
Ritchie v. Franklin County. 1. Where a constitution of a State forbids special legislation, an act, demanded by considerations of high justice and by the fact that carelessness in the language of previous statutes has worked the necessity f
Putnam v. Day
Putnam v. Day. 1. On a bill of review in equity nothing can be examined but the pleadings, proceedings and decree, which, in this country, constitute what is called the record in the cause. The proofs cannot be looked into as they can on an
Scott v. Kelly
Scott, Assignee, v. Kelly. 1. When an assignee in bankruptcy voluntarily submits himself to the jurisdiction of a State court, and that court renders judgment against him, it is too late for him to allege that' the Federal courts alone have
Jeffries v. Life Insurance
Jeffries v. Life Insurance Company. Where a policy of life insurance contains the following conditions, to wit: “ This policy is issued by the company, and accepted by the assured, on the following express conditions and agreements, which a
House v. Mullen
House et al. v. Mullen. 1. A bill was filed by two parties, one of whom showed good cause for equitable relief, but the other of whom did not show what interest he had in the subject-matter of jitigation, or that he had any. The bill was de
Cary v. Savings Union
Cary, Collector, v. The Savings Union. Where depositors in a savings bank do not receive a fixed rate of interest independently of what the bank itself may make or lose in lending their money, but receive a share of such profits as the .ban
Insurance Co. v. Newton
Insurance Company v. Newton. 1. Every admission upon which a party relies, is to he taken as an entirety of the fact which makes for his side, with the qualifications which limit, modify, or destroy its effect. When, therefore, the agent an
Gill v. Wells
Gill v. Wells. 1. An original patent of one Wells, for a hat-body machine, among other things, minutely described a specific device called a “ chamber or tunnel,” composed of two side pieces, a bottom piece, and a top piece, permanently uni
Morton v. Nebraska
Morton v. Nebraska. 1. The policy of the government, since the acquisition of the Northwest Territory and the inauguration of our land system, to reserve salt springs from sale, has been uniform. This policy 1ms been applied to the “ Louisi
United States v. Boecker
United States v. Boecker et al. The provision in the sixth section of the act of July 20th, 1868, as to notice of the place at which a distiller is to carry on his business, is r.ot matter of form; and when the distiller’s bond, following t
Vigo's Case
Vigo’s Case: Ex parte United States. 1. Whan a claim on tho government, not capable of being otherwise prosecuted, is referred by special net of Congress tq the Court of Claims, acting judicially in its determination, a right of appeal to t
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.