Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1874 Cases
197 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Doe v. Childress
Doe v. Childress. Under the fourteenth section of the Bankrupt Act — which enacts that the ■ register shall convey to the assignee all the estate, real and personal, of the bankrupt, and that such assignment shall relate back to the commenc
Wood v. Bailey
Wood v. Bailey, Assignee. 1. Upcler the eighth section of the Bankrupt Act, which enacts that “no ap-' peal shall be allowed in any case from the District to the Circuit Court unless it is claimed and notice given thereof, ... to the assign
Moore v. Mississippi
Moore v. Mississippi. 1. Where a case is brought here from the highest court of the State under the assumption that it is within section 709 of the Revised Statutes, if the record shows upon its face that a Federal question was not necessar
Jackson v. Ludeling
Jackson v. Ludeling. 1. When two or more persons have a common interest in a security, equity-will not allow one to appropriate it exclusively to himself, or to impair its worth to the others. Community of interest involves mutual obligatio
National Bank v. Colby
National Bank v. Colby. 1. The property of a National bank organized under the act of Congress of June 3d, 1864, attached at the suit of an individual creditor, after 1he bank has become insolvent, cannot be subjected to sale for the paymen
The Lottawanna
The Lottawanna. 1. Whilst the general maritime law is the basis of the maritime law of the United States, as well as of other countries, it is only so far operative in this, or any country, as it is adopted by the laws and usages thereof. I
Edwards v. Elliott
Edwards v. Elliott et al. 1. Where the record before the court, on a case from a State court, shows a declaration, pleas to it, issue on them, verdict on those issues and judgment on the verdict, without allusion to any demurrer, the court
Langdeau v. Hanes
Langdeau v. Hanes. The State of Virginia, which, prior to tho Revolution, asserted title to tho Northwest Territory, always respected the possessions and titles of the French and Canadian inhabitants who had doularcd themselves her citizens
Case of Broderick's Will
Case of Broderick’s Will. 1. A court of equity has not jurisdiction to avoid a will or to set aside the probate thereof on the ground of fraud, mistake, or forgery; this being within the exclusive jurisdiction of tbe .courts of probate. 2.
Little v. Alexander
Little, Assignee, v. Alexander. 1. When the issue to he decided is whether a judgment against an insolvent was obtained with a view to give a preference, the intention of the bankrupt is the turning-point of the case, and all the circumstan
Erie Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania
Erie Railway Company v. Pennsylvania. 1. A railroad 455 miles long, 42 miles of which were in a State other than that by which it was incorporated, held to he “doing business” within , the State where the 42 miles were, within the meaning o
Texas v. Chiles
Texas v. Chiles. 1. The purpose of the act of Congress (Revised Statutes, ?¿ 858) enacting that “in courts of the United States no witness shall be excluded ... in any civil action, because he is a party to or interested in the issue to be
Grosholz v. Newman
Grosholz v. Newman. 1. A mere intention to make a lot adjoining one on which a man and wife have their dwelling — the two lots being separated only by a small alley— a part of a homestead, and the subsequent actual building of a kitchen on
Fox v. Gardner
Fox v. Gardner, Assignee. Where a debtor, knowing that his creditor is insolvent, accepts a draft drawn on him by snch creditor, the draft being drawn and accepted with the purpose of giving a preference, the transaction is a fraud on the B
Railroad Co. v. Maryland
Railroad Company v. Maryland. 1. A stipulation in the charter of a railroad company, that the company shall pay to the State a bonus, or a portion of its earnings, is not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States. 2. Such a stipula
Hill v. Mendenhall
Hill v. Mendenhall. 1. Where suit is brought on a record which shows that service was not made on the defendant, but which shows also that an appearance was entered for him by an attorney of the court, it is not allowable, under a plea of n
Trist v. Child
Trist v. Child. 1. A mere personal agreement by one setting up a claim on the government, with another person to pay to such person a percentage of whatever sum Congress, through the instrumentality of such person, may appropriate in paymen
Dillon v. Barnard
Dillon v. Barnard et al 1. A demurrer to a bill in equity does not admit the correctness of averments as to the meaning of an instrument set forth in or annexed to the bill. 2. To create, for future services of a contractor, a lien upon par
Michaels v. Post
Michaels et al. v. Post, Assignee. 1. Where one creditor has been induced by fraudulent representations ol another creditor, who wishes to get into his own hands all the property of their common debtor, to release his debt, and the second c
Atlee v. Packet Co.
Atlee v. Packet Company. 1. A pier erected in the navigable water of the Mississippi River for the sole use of the riparian owner, as part of a boom for saw-logs, without license or authority of any kind, except such as may arise from his o
Brown v. Brackett
Brown v. Brackett. A confirmation of a claim to land in California under a grant from the former Mexican government, obtained under the net of Congress of March 3d, 1851, is limited by the extent of the claim made ; nnd the decree of confir
Watson v. Taylor
Watson, Assignee, v. Taylor, In which the doctrines of the preceding case are affirmed and applied to the case of a note with warrant to confess judgment, given five months before the petition of bankruptcy was filed against the debtor; the
Clark v. Iselin
Clark, Assignee, v. Iselin. 1. When a person, borrowing money of another, pledges with that other a large number of bills receivable as collateral security for the loan (many of them overdue) the pledgee may properly hand them back to the d
Hotchkiss v. National Banks
Hotchkiss v. National Banks. 1. In May, 1863, the Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company issued coupon bonds, by each of which the company acknowledged its indebtedness to certain persons named, or bearer, in the sum of $1000, and promised
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.