Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Torrent Arms Lumber Co. v. Rodgers
TORRENT ARMS LUMBER COMPANY v. RODGERS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Argued November 25, 1884. Decided December 22, 1884. A reissue of a patent, applied for with unreasonable delay
United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.
UNITED STATES v. GREAT FALLS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Argued December 1, 1884. Decided December 22, 1884. Where property to which the United States asserts no title, is taken by their officers or agents, pursu
Union Metallic Cartridge Co. v. United States Cartridge Co.
UNION METALLIC CARTRIDGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES CARTRIDGE COMPANY. UNITED STATES CARTRIDGE COMPANY v. UNION METALLIC CARTRIDGE COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued December
Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. Railroad Commissioners
MEMPHIS & LITTLE ROCK RAILROAD COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. Submitted November 23, 1884. Decided December 22, 1884. A statute exempting a corporation from taxation confers the pr
Bond v. Dustin
BOND & Another v. DUSTIN. IN ERROíí'TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE ILLINOIS. Argued December 3, 1884. Decided December 22, 1884. In an action at law, submitted to the decision of the Circuit Court by
Matthews v. Warner
MATTHEWS v. WARNER & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued December 9, 10, 1884. Decided December 22, 1884. On the facts in this case it appears that the plaintiff had no real
Arthur v. Morgan
ARTHUR, Collector, v. MORGAN. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEAV YORK. Submitted November 20, 1884. Decided December 22, 1884. A carriage in use abroad for a year by its owner, wno brings it
Mattoon v. McGrew
MATTOON v. McGREW. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued November 23, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. JELitz v. National Metropolitan Bank, 111 IT. S. 722, was decided, after elaborate argument and careful consi
Scharff v. Levy
SCHARFF & Another v. LEVY & Another. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Submitted November 24, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. A case cannot ber removed from a State court under the act
Power v. Baker
POWER & Another v. BAKER & Another. IN error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Submitted November 24, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. Motions to vacate a supersedeas, and other motions of that kind, m
Britton v. Thornton
BRITTON & Another v. THORNTON. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued November 26, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. Under a devise to one person in fee, and, in case he should die
The Elizabeth Jones
THE ELIZABETH JONES. THE WILLIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued November 13, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. A schooner was sailing E. by IT., with the wind S., and a bark w
State ex rel. Markley v. Baldwin
STATE OF MARYLAND, for use of Markley, v. BALDWIN & Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Argued November 13, 14, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. A suit on an administrator’s bond, taken i
Carter v. Carusi
CARTER v. CARUSI & Another, Executors. IN ERROR' TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. Argned November 24, 25, 1884. Decided December 15, 1884. The provision, in § 715 Rev. Stat. District of Columbia, that a tender contracting t
Edye v. Robertson
HEAD MONEY CASES. EDYE and Another v. ROBERTSON, Collector. CUNARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. IN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ^ ' IN-ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE U
Chew Heong v. United States
CHEW HEONG v. UNITED STATES. IN ERROR TO TIIE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE CALIFORNIA. Argued October 30, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. The fourth section of the act of Congress, approved May 6,1882, ch. 126, as
United States v. North
UNITED STATES v. NORTH. UNITED STATES v. EMORY. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted November 20, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. Officers of the army and officers of the navy, engaged in the service of the United States in the war w
New Orleans Insurance v. Albro Co.
NEW ORLEANS INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALBRO COMPANY. IN error to the circuit court oe the UNITED STATES for tiie EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Submitted November 17, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. .It is within the discretion of a Circuit Cour
England v. Gebhardt
ENGLAND v. GEBHARDT. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Submitted November 20, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. No question of fact can be re-examined in this court on a writ of error, unless t
Birdsell v. Shaliol
BIRDSELL & Others v. SHALIOL & Another. .APPEAL FROM THE' CIRCUIT'COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued November 12, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. Judgment for and payment of nominal damages' upon a bill in
Middleton v. Mullica Township
MIDDLETON v. MULLICA TOWNSHIP. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES ROB THE DISTRICT OR NEW JERSEY. Argued October 17, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. An act of the legislature of New Jersey construed, — to the effect that it
Richardson v. Traver
RICHARDSON v. TRAVER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT- OF ILLINOIS. Submitted November 14, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. H & M, being owners in common of a tract of land covered by a mortgage t
Kansas Pacific Railroad v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad
KANSAS PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF'KANSAS. Argued November 4, 5, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. Under the act of March 3,
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Ross
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROSS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Argued April 14, 1884. Decided December 8, 1884. A railroad corporation is responsible to its train ser
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.