Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Oyster v. Oyster
No. 134. Oyster v. Oyster.
Lamar v. Micou
LAMAR, Executor, v. MICOU, Administratrix. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued October 31, November 3,1884 Decided December 1, 1884. The war of the rebellion, and the residence of
Fortier v. New Orleans National Bank
FORTIER v. NEW ORLEANS NATIONAL BANK. NEW ORLEANS NATIONAL BANK v. FORTIER. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Argued November 17, 1884. Decided December 1, 1884. A bill was brought in
Batchelor v. Brereton
BATCHELOR v. BRERETON & Another. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued November 14, 1884. Decided December 1, 1884. S, the wife of B, joined with him in a deed to H of land of B, in trust for the use of S, during
Brandies v. Cochrane
BRANDIES & Others v. COCHRANE & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued November 17, 18, 1884. Decided December 1, 1884. F conveyed to W, as trustee, real estate in Illinois o
Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National Bank
REYNOLDS v. CRAWFORDSVILLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Submitted November 10, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. After a cause in equity has been set down for hearing on
Mackall v. Richards
MACKALL v. RICHARDS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued November 10, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. When a mandate of this court, made after hearing and deciding an appeal in equity, directed such further pr
Hart v. Pennsylvania Railroad
HART v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued November 13, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. Where a contract of carriage, signed by the shipper, is f
Bates County v. Winters
BATES COUNTY v. WINTERS & Another. IN EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT C0UET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE. WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued November 12, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. A vote by a County Court in Missouri subscribing to tbe capita
Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain Railroad v. Nashua & Lowell Railroad
OGDENSBURGH & LAKE CHAMPLAIN RAILROAD COMPANY v. NASHUA & LOWELL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE NEW HAMPSHIRE. Submitted October 29, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. Four parties mad
East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Southern Telegraph Co.
EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA & GEORGIA RAILROAD CO. v. SOUTHERN TELEGRAPH COMPANY. IN ERROR TO TIIE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OE ALABAMA. Submitted November 10, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. Hilton v. Dickins
Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.
HEIDRITTER v. ELIZABETH OIL-CLOTH COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Argued November 7, 8, 1884 Decided November 24, 1884. Where proceedings in rem are commenced in a State court and
Exchange National Bank v. Third National Bank
EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSBURGH v. THIRD NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK. IN ERROR TO' THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Argued November 6, 1884. Decided November 24, 1884. A bank in Pittsburgh sent to a
Grame v. Mutual Assurance Co.
GRAME, Executor, v. MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA. GODDIN, Executor, v. SAME. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. Argued November 18, 1884. Decided November 19, 1884. Whether the destruction of a buildi
Grenada County Supervisors v. Brogden
GRENADA COUNTY SUPERVISORS & Others v. BROGDEN & Others. IN ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE MISSISSIPPI. Submitted October 22, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. That construction of a statute sho
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Union Trust Co.
CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNION TRUST COMPANY. IN ERROR iTO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES' EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. Argued October 20, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. The provision in the New York
Morris v. McMillin
MORRIS & Others, Executors, v. McMILLIN & Others, Administrators. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued November 5, 6, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. The patent granted to John
California ex rel. Hastings v. Jackson
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. HASTINGS v. JACKSON & Another. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted October 31, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. This court has no jurisdiction over the decision and judgment of a
Hancock v. Holbrook
HANCOCK v. HOLBROOK & Others. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE LOUISIANA. Argued November 4, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. When a cause commenced in a State court, and removed to a circuit co
Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins
BRADSTREET COMPANY v. HIGGINS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Submitted October 27, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. When the jurisdiction of this court for review of the judgments
Labette County Commissioners v. United States ex rel. Moulton
LABETTE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS & Others v. UNITED STATES ex rel. MOULTON. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Submitted October 24, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. Mandamus will lie against county c
Snyder v. United States
SNYDER v. UNITED STATES. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Submitted November 4, 1884. Decided November 17, 1884. A general verdict, upon an information in several counts for a single forfeitu
Pugh v. Fairmount Gold & Silver Mining Co.
PUGH v. FAIRMOUNT GOLD & SILVER MINING COMPANY & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. Argued October 22, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. If holders of notes of a corporation, secured by
Foster v. Kansas ex rel. Johnston
FOSTER v. KANSAS, ex rel. JOHNSTON, Attorney-General. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. Submitted October 14, 1884. Decided October 27, and November 10, 1884. A -writ of error operates as a suspersedeas only from the tim
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.