Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Great Western Insurance v. United States
GREAT WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. PAULSON, Receiver, v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS EROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. Argued October 14, 15, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. A claim 'against the United States for a part of the money rece
Ayres v. Wiswall
AYRES & Others v. WISWALL & Others. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. Submitted October 20, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. In a proceeding commenced in a State court to foreclose a mo
Scotland County v. Hill
SCOTLAND COUNTY v. HILL. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued October 21, 22, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. The judgment of a State court in Missouri adverse to the validity of b
Ex parte Royall
EX PARTE ROYALL. ORIGINAL. Submitted October 14, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. The act of March 27, 1868,15 Stat. 44, took from this court the jurisdiction to review on appeal a decision of a Circuit Court upon a writ of habeas corpus. T
Ex parte Crouch
EX PARTE CROUCH. ORIGINAL. Submitted October 14, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. The writ of habeas corpus from this court cannot be used to correct or prevent possible future errors, in violation of the Constitution of the United States,
Ex parte Virginia Commissioners
EX PARTE VIRGINIA COMMISSIONERS. ORIGINAL. Submitted October 27, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. A writ of mandamus is" not ordinarily granted when the party alleging the grievance has another adequate remedy, and that remedy has not been
Buena Vista County v. Iowa Falls & Sioux City Railroad
BUENA VISTA COUNTY v. IOWA FALLS & SIOUX CITY RAILROAD COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE' SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. Argued October 31, 1884. Decided November 10, 1884. The right of review of the official acts of the Commissioner of the Lan
Mahn v. Harwood
MAHN v. HARWOOD & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Submitted October 16, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. A patent for ball-covers issued to Janies H. Osgood May 21, 1872, reissue
Ranney v. Barlow
RANNEY, Administrator, v. BARLOW & Another. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT .COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued October 20, 21, 1884. — Decided November 3, 1884. A & B, residents in New York, were owners of one un
Scott v. Hickman
FORT SCOTT v. HICKMAN. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OP KANSAS. Submitted October 17, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. The statute of the State of Kansas (Gen. Stat. of Kansas, eh. 80, art. 3, sec.34, p.
Horbach v. Hill
HORBACH v. HILL. . APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Argued October 23, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. Whether an agreement for a reconveyance of real estate, conveyed, by deed in fee simple,
Mersman v. Werges
MERSMAN v. WERGES & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. Argued October 17, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. The addition of the signature of a surety to a promissory note, without the consent
Nix v. Allen
NIX v. ALLEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Submitted October 17, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. The exercise óf a pre-emption right under the act of September 4, 1841, 5 Stat. 453
Adams County v. Burlington & Missouri Railroad
ADAMS COUNTY v. BURLINGTON & MISSOURI RAILROAD CO. IN .error to the supreme court OF IOWA. Argued October 22, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. When a record shows that two questions are presented by the pleadings, one Federal and one non-Fed
Elk v. Wilkins
ELK v. WILKINS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE NEBRASKA. Argued April 28, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. An Indian, born a member of one of the Indian tribes within the United States, which .still ex
United States v. Flanders
UNITED STATES v. FLANDERS & Others. IN error to' the circuit court oe the united states eoe THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE LOUISIANA. Argued October 20, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. A person appointed and commissioned as a collector of internal
United States v. Waddell
UNITED STATES v. WADDELL & Others. ON CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Submitted October 14, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. § 0508 Rev. Stat. is a constitutional and
Moran v. New Orleans
MORAN, Ex’r of COOPER v. NEW ORLEANS. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE LOUISIANA. Submitted April 15, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. A municipal ordinance of the city of New Orleans, to establish the rate of-license for professions, callin
Butterworth v. United States ex rel. Hoe
BUTTERWORTH, Commissioner of Patents, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. HOE & Others. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued October 15, 16, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. The Secretary of the Interior has no power by law
Mellen v. Wallach
MELLEN v. WALLACH. APPEAL EROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. Argued April 24, 1884. Decided November 3, 1884. Under a deed oí trust to secure M.„ covering land in the District of Columbia, owned by B. and W., as tenants in
Wilson v. Arrick
WILSON, Adm’r, v. ARRICK, Adm’x. rtsr EREOE TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. Argued October 16, 1884. Decided October 27, 1884. In the District of Columbia, a debt due the estate of an intestate, collected by an agent of th
Davies v. Corbin
DAVIES, Collector, v. CORBIN & Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Submitted April 14, 1884. Decided October 27, 1884. An order awarding a peremptory ■ writ of mandamus which dire
Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.
SKIDMORE & Others v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted October 17, 1884. Decided October 27, 1884. The legal title to real
Moffat v. United States
MOFFAT & Another v. UNITED STATES. MOFFAT v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. Submitted October 16, 1884. Decided October 27, 1884. The presumption of the regularity of all pro
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.