Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Jonesboro City v. Cairo & St. Louis Railroad
JONESBORO CITY v. CAIRO & ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY & Another. APPEAL FEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHEEN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted January 2d, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Constitutional Law — Illinois—
White v. Crow
WHITE v. CROW & Others. APPEAL PROM THE OIEOUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Colorado — -Execution—Judgment—Redemption. When, in Colorado, the agent of an
Quebec Bank v. Hellman
QUEBEC BANK OF TORONTO v. HELLMAN, Assignee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. ' Argued January 4th, 7th, and 8th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Principal and Agent. The deposit of a p
Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.
REDFIELD, Executrix, v. YSTALYFERA IRON COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT .COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Damages — Error—Interest—Laches—Practice. 1
Bissell v. Spring Valley Township
BISSELL v. SPRING VALLEY TOWNSHIP. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE KANSAS. ' Submitted January 2d, 1884 Decided January 21st, 1884. Estoppel — Kansas—Municipal Bonds-r-Statufes. 1. A statute oí the Sta
United States ex rel. Chandler v. County Commissioners
UNITED STATES, on the relation of Chandler, v. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DODGE COUNTY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Internal Improvem
Hart v. Sansom
HART v. SANSOM & Another. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Submitted January 2d, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Estoppel — Evidence—Judgment. A decree of a State court for the removal
United States v. Lawton
UNITED STATES v. LAWTON. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Statutes — Tax-Sale. Land subject to a direct tax was sold for.its non-payment, and was bought In 'for the United States for
Bussey v. Excelsior Manufacturing Co.
BUSSEY & Another v. EXCELSIOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY. EXCELSIOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BUSSEY & Another. APPEALS ERpM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOUEI. Argued January 8th, 1884. Decided January 21
Allen v. Withrow
ALLEN & Another v. WITHROW & Another. ON APPEAR FROM THE CIRCTHT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. Argued December 11th and 12th, 1883. Decided January 14th, 1884. Deed — Equity—Frauds, Statute of — Iowa—Partnership—Statu
Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton
KELLOGG BRIDGE COMPANY v. HAMILTON. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Submitted October 31st, 1883. Decided January 14th, 1884. Contract — Implied, Warranty. A bridge company, having part
Hilton v. Merritt
HILTON & Another, v. MERRITT, Collector. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW T vRK. Argued December 17th and 18th, 1883. Decided January 14th, 1884. Customs Duties. 1. The valuation of merchan
Claflin v. Commonwealth Insurance
CLAFLIN & Others v. COMMONWEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY. SAME v. WESTERN ASSURANCE COMPANY. SAME v. FRANKLIN INSURANCE COMPANY. ALL:.IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Argued and submitted October 1
Schreiber v. Sharpless
SCHREIBER & Others v. SHARPLESS. ORIGINAL. Submitted December 17th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Abatement — Action—Copyright—Penalty—Statutes. 1.. The rule-at common law, that qui tam actions on penal statutes do’ not survive, prevails
Frelinghuysen v. Key
FRELINGHUYSEN, Secretary of State, v. KEY. LA ABRA SILVER MINING COMPANY v. FRELINGHUYSEN, Secretary of State. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued December 3d, 4th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Awards under
American Bible Society v. Price
AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY & Others v. PRICE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted December 14th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Removal of Causes — Statutes. 1. Under the third subdivision of § 639 R
Holland v. Chambers
HOLLAND v. CHAMBERS. m ERBOB TO THE CIEOUIT C0UET OF THE TOOTED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Submitted December 17th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Mem-oval of Causes. Under the act of March Sd, 1875, c. 187,18 Stat. 470,
Susquehanna Boom Co. v. West Branch Boom Co.
SUSQUEHANNA BOOM COMPANY & Others v. WEST BRANCH BOOM COMPANY. IN ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.' Submitted December 10th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Constitutional Law — Corporations—Practice. Where the federal question
Hoff v. Jasper County
HOFF v. JASPER COUNTY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COUET OB ' THE UNITED ■ STATES FOft THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued and submitted December 20th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Municipal Bonds1 — Holder for Value. 1. When a municip
Jenness v. Citizens' National Bank
JENNESS v. CITIZENS’ NATIONAL BANK OF ROME. IN ERROR ■ TO THE CIKCUIT COURT. FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP ' MICHIGAN. Submitted December 20th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Appeal — Jurisdiction: • When a judgment below is for an amount s
United States v. Carey
UNITED STATES v. CAREY & Another. UNITED STATES v. CAREY. IN ERROR TO THE OIRCOTT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE district of Louisiana. Submitted December 12th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. 'Error — Exceptions—Evidence—Practice. Whe
Gilmer v. Higley
GILMER & Another v. HIGLEY. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OF MONTA* 4. Argued December 10th, 1883. Decided January 7th, 1884. Common Carrier — Error—Evidence. 1. In a suit by a passenger on a stage coach against the proprie
Taylor v. Bemiss
TAYLOR & Another v. BEMISS & Others by their next Friend. BEMISS & Others by their next Friend v. TAYLOR & Another. BEMISS v. BEMISS & Others by their next Friend. APPEALS FROM THE' SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued December
Cedar Rapids & Missouri River Railroad v. Herring
CEDAR RAPIDS & MISSOURI RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY and Another v. HERRING. SAME v. LAKE. SAME v. IDDINGS. SAME v. CUTLER. SAME v. DUNDON. SAME v. BROOKS. SAME v. GREENSTREET. SAME v. WOOSTER. SAME v. BOYD. SAME v. JEWELL & Others. ALL IN ERROR
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.