Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Vogel v. Gruaz
VOGEL, Executor, v. GRUAZ. nr ERROR TO THE CIRCÜIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued January 17th, 18th, 1884. Decided February 4th, 1884. Privileged Communication — Slander. A communication made to a
Jeffries v. Mutual Life Insurance
JEFFRIES, Administrator, v. MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued and submitted January 16th, 1884. — Decided February 4th, 1884. Error — C
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway v. Knox
WABASH, ST. LOUIS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. KNOX. IN EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted January 14th, 1884. — Decided January 28th, 1884. When the amount in dispute in this co
Illinois Central Railroad v. Turrill
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. TURRILL, Administratrix. MICHIGAN SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY v. Same. APPEALS FROM THE CIROUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. ’ Argued January 11th,
Whiteside v. Haselton
WHITESIDE v. HASELTON & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Argued January 14th, 15th, 1884. — Decided January 28th, 1884. Appeal — Estoppel—Evidence—Jurisdiction—Lis Pendens — P
American File Co. v. Garrett
AMERICAN FILE COMPANY & Another v. GARRETT & Another. SAYLES & Another v. GARRETT & Another. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. Argued January 16th, 17th, 1884 Decided January 28th, 1884. A
Krippendorf v. Hyde
KRIPPENDORF v. HYDE & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Submitted January 2d, 1884. Decided January 28th, 1884. Equity — Jurisdiction—Officers of the Court — Parties. A bill filed on th
James v. Hicks
JAMES, Administratrix, v. HICKS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 28th, 1884. Internal Sevenue — Limitation—Statutes—Tax. ' 1. An action-to
Freeman v. Dawson
FREEMAN, Trustee, v. DAWSON. APPEAR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Argued January 16th, 1884. Decided January 28th, 1884. Execution — Judgment—Jurisdiction. From a decree of the Circuit Co
Chouteau v. Barlow
CHOUTEAU & Others v. BARLOW, Executor and Trustee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT" COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Argued January 10th, 11th, 1884. Decided January 28th, 1884. The decree of the Circuit Court was reversed
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. National Car-Brake Shoe Co.
LAKE SHORE & MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. NATIONAL CAR-BRAKE SHOE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COÜRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued January 9th, 10th, 1884 Decided January 28th, 1884. Patent.
Peugh v. Davis
PEUGH v. DAVIS. APPEAL EEOM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted January 7th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Appeal — Supersedeas, If a court in session and acting judicially allows an appeal which is entered of recor
United States v. Grant
UNITED STATES v. GRANT. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Submitted December 17th, 1883. Decided January 21st, 1884. Appeal — Court of Claims — Statutes. An act which directs the Court of Claims to reopen and readjudicate a claim, and in cas
First National Bank v. Redick
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA v. REDICK. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR •THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted December 17th, 1883. Decided January 21st, 1884. Error — Jurisdiction. When the plaintiff below in open cour
Dows v. Johnson
DOWS & Another v. JOHNSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. Submitted January 7th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Jurisdiction. When the value of the matter in dispute in this court is less tha
Jenkins v. Lœwenthal
JENKINS, Assignee, v. LŒWENTHAL & Another. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Submitted January 7th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Error — Practice. When the record discloses two defences to an action brought in a S
United States v. Graham
UNITED STATES v. GRAHAM. APPEAL EEOM THE COUKT OF CLAIMS. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Construction of Statutes — Mileage. 1. The act of 1830, 4 Stat. 755, which provided that ten cents a mile should be allowed t
Aurrecoechea v. Bangs
AURRECOECHEA v. BANGS. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Practice. When counsel stipulate to submit a case, fixing a time for filing of argument by the plaintiff, and a tim
Hambro v. Casey
HAMBRO & Another v. CASEY, Receiver. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Submitted. January 3d, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Bill of Exchange — Da/mages—Protest. When a bank, the o
Vinal v. West Virginia Oil & Oil Land Co.
VINAL v. WEST VIRGINIA OIL & OIL LAND COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE OIROUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WÉST VIRGINIA. ' . Submitted January 10th, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Action — Error—Partnership. Mr. John A. Hutch
District of Columbia v. Clephane
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CLEPHANE. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted January 2d, 1884. Decided January 21st, 1884. Contract. An agreement to lay down a certain kind of pavement in the streets of a city, and
Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.
DIMPFELL & Another v. OHIO & MISSISSIPPI RAILWAY COMPANY & Another. APPEAL PEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHEEN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued November 28th, December 3d, 1883. Decided January 21st, 1884. Corporations
Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. United States
SIOUX CITY & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. Submitted December 18th, 1883. Decided January 21st, 1884. Internal Revenue — Land Grant Railroads — Statut
Zane v. Soffe
ZANE & Another v. SOFFE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued October 24th, 1883. Decided January 21st, 1884. Evidence — Patent. 1. A patent was issued June 23d, 1865, to one Jenni
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.