Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Börs v. Preston
BÖRS v. PRESTON. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TOE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Argued January 4th, 1884. Decided April 7th, 1884. Consul— Constitutional Law — Evidence. In cases coming from tlie Circuit Courts, t
Teal v. Walker
TEAL v. WALKER. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Argued March 25th, 28th, 1884. Decided April 7th, 1884. Mortgage — Pleading. When a demurrer to a complaint for failure'to state a cause of actio
Hayes v. Michigan Central Railroad
HAYES, by his next Friend, v. MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIBOtTIT COHBT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued March 19th, 1884. Decided April 7th, 1884. Railroad — Municipal Corporations.
Drury v. Hayden
DRURY v. HAYDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE' UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted March 25th, 1884. Decided April 7th, 1884. Mistake — Mortgage. Where in a recorded deed of land subject to a mortgage, an
Burley v. German-American Bank
BURLEY, Receiver, v. GERMAN-AMERICAN BANK. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT CO^RT OF THE' UNITED ■ STATES FOR THE SOÍJTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ” Argued March 28th, 1884. Decided April 7th, 1884. Evidence — New York Code — Pleading-*-Rés Gestee. I
Astor v. Merritt
ASTOR v. MERRITT, Collector. IN ERROR TO'THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued March 21st, 24th, 1884. Decided April 7th, 1884. Customs Duties — Wearing Apparel. A citizen of the United States,
Chouteau v. Gibson
CHOUTEAU & Another v. GIBSON. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI. Submitted March 10th, 1884. Decided March 31st, 1884. Jurisdiction'. In order to give this court jurisdiction in error of a State court it must appear affirmatively on
Stephens v. Monongahela Bank
STEPHENS v. MONONGAHELA BANK. N ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE .WESTERN DISTRICT OE PENNSYLVANIA. Argued March 17th, 1884. Decided March 31st, 1884. Pleading— Usury. The defence of another action pending can only be
Rosenthal v. Walker
ROSENTHAL v. WALKER, Assignee. .IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Argued March 21st, 1884. Decided March 31st, 1884. Bankruptcy — Statute of IAmitations — Evidence. Where an action by an assig
Covell v. Heyman
COVELL v. HEYMAN. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Argued March 17th, 1884 Decided March 31st, 1884. Conflict of Law. The possession by a marshal of a court of the United States of property by virtue of a levy under a
Ware v. Galveston City Co.
WARE & Another v. GALVESTON CITY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. Argued March 19th, 1884. Decided March 31st, 1884. Action — Limitations, Statute of — Parties—Trust. -If que dea
Moores v. Citizens' National Bank
MOORES v. CITIZENS’ NATIONAL BANK OF PIQUA. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued March 6th, 7th, 1884 Decided March 31st, 1884. Certificate of Stock — Corporation—Fraud. A lent money t
Cooper v. Schlesinger
COOPER & Another v. SCHLESINGER & Another. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued March 19th, 1884. Decided March 31st, 1884. Damages — Fraudulent Representations — Trial. . Where a char
New England Mutual Life Insurance v. Woodworth
NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WOODWORTH, Administrator. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued.March 18th, 1884. Decided March 31st, 1884. Conflict of Law — Corporatio
Slidell v. Grandjean
SLIDELL & Another v. GRANDJEAN, Deputy Surveyor of the United States. SAME v. RICHARDSON, Register of State Land Office of Louisiana. SAME v. EMLER & Others. SAME v. TSCHIRN. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTE
Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad v. White
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. WHITE. ORIGINAL. Argued March 11th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Jurisdiction — Practice—Removal of Causes. When a cause is properly removed 'from a State court to a Federal court, and the State cour
Phœnix Bank v. Risley
PHŒNIX BANK v. RISLEY. IN error to the court op appeals op the state op new tore. Argued. March 13th, 14th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Bank — Confiscation. The rule that the relation between a bank atd its general depositors is that of
Black v. Thorne
BLACK, Administrator v. THORNE & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued January 24th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Damages — Patent. Damages must be nominal in an action
Garretson v. Clark
GARRETSON v. CLARK & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES'' FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued January 18th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Patent. When a patent is for an improvement of an existing machin
Moore v. Page
MOORE & Another v. PAGE & Another. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT-OF ILLINOIS. Submitted November 26th, 1883. Decided March 24th, 1884. Fraudulent Conveyance — Husband and Wife. A husband may se
Taylor v. Bowker
TAYLOR & Another, Executors, v. BOWKER. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE MAINE. Argued March 12th, 13th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Statute of Limitations — Equity—Corporations. If a statute enact
McMurray v. Mallory
McMURRAY & Others v. MALLORY & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Argued March 11th, 12th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Patent. If a patent is granted for a combination, one part of
Dixon County v. Field
DIXON COUNTY v. FIELD. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted January 2d, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Estoppel — Legislative Authority — Municipal Corporations — Nebraska. There must b
Canal Bank v. Hudson
CANAL BANK & Others v. HUDSON & Another. APPEAR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE' UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Submitted February 12th, 1884. Decided March 24th, 1884. Devise — Equity—Iáen—Parties—Statutes of Mississ
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.