Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hollister v. Zion's Co-operative Mercantile Institution
HOLLISTER, Collector, v. ZION’S CO-OPERATIVE MERCANTILE INSTITUTION. WILLIS, Collector, v. BELLEVILLE NAIL COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony
BURROW-GILES LITHOGRAPHIC COMPANY v. SARONY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Submitted December 13th, 1883. Decided March 17th, 1884. Copyright. It is within the constitutional power
Stevens v. Griffith
STEVENS v. GRIFFITH. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE. Submitted February 4th, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Rebellion. A judgment of a Confederate court during the rebellion confiscating a claim due to a loyal citizen residing
Ex parte Virginia
EX PARTE VIRGINIA. ORIGINAL. Argued March 3d, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Statutes — Surplus Revenue. The Secretary of the Treasury is not authorized, to use the revenues of the United States, accrued since January 1st, 1839, in order t
United States v. Ulrici
UNITED STATES v. ULRICI. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF -THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued March 5th, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Internal Revenue. The sureties on a distiller’s bond for payment of taxes a
Walsh v. Mayer
WALSH v. MAYER & Others. MAYER & Others v. WALSH. APPEALS XROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OX THE UNITED STATES XOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OX MISSISSIPPI. Argued January 31st, February 1st, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Conflict of Law — Statute of
Swift Co. v. United States
SWIFT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Argued March 5th, 6th, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Internal Revenue — Voluntary Payment. Under the act of July 14th, 1870, c. 355, § 4, 1G Stat. 257, the proprietor of fri
Lammon v. Feusier
LAMMON & Others v. FEUSIER & Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Submitted January 10th, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Bond — Officer of the Court — Surety. The taking,.hy a marshal of th
Otoe County v. Baldwin
OTOE COUNTY v. BALDWIN. BALDWIN v. OTOE COUNTY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted January 4th, 1884. Decided March 17th, 1884. Jurisdiction — Legislative Authority — Municipal Bonds —
Parcher v. Cuddy
THE MAMIE. PARCHER & Another v. CUDDY, Administrator. ORIGINAN MOTION, ENTITLED IN A CAUSE PENDING ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Submitted March 4th, 1884. Decided March 10th, 18
Leggett v. Allen
LEGGETT v. ALLEN, Assignee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Submitted March 3d, 1884. Decided March 10th, 1884. Bankruptcy. This court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment of a C
United States v. Ryder
UNITED STATES v. RYDER & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THÍE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Argued December 12th, 1883. Decided March 10th, 1884. Subrogation — Heoognizamce. Without an express contract of indemnity
Cutler v. Kouns
CUTLER v. KOUNS & Another. IN .ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Argued January 9th, 1884. Decided March 10th, 1884. Rebellion — Restrictions upon Trade. Under authority derived from § 8 o
Freedman's Savings & Trust Co. v. Earle
FREEDMAN’S SAVINGS & TRUST COMPANY v. EARLE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPEEME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued February 1st, 1884. Decided March 10th, 1884. Judgment 'Lien on Equity of Redemption. It was decided in Morsett v. First National
Cheely v. Clayton
CHEELY & Others v. CLAYTON. IN ERROR TO THE OIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POE THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. Submitted January 10th, 1884. Decided March 10th, 1884. Divorce. A decree of divorce from the bond of matrimony, obtained by a husb
Rice v. Sioux City & St. Paul Railroad
RICE v. SIOUX CITY & ST. PAUL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Submitted January 14th, 1884. Decided March 3d, 1884. Public Lands — Statutes. Claimants against the governme
United States v. Brindle
UNITED STATES v. BRINDLE. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA., Argued January 18th, 1884. Decided March 3d, 1884. Office — Public Lands — Salary—Statutes.' A receiver of public moneys
Dallas County v. McKenzie
DALLAS COUNTY v. McKENZIE. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT, OF MISSOURI. Submitted January 16th, 1881 Decided March 3d, 1884. ■Evidence — Municipal Bonds., Balls County v. Douglas, 105 U. S. 738,
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Denver & New Orleans Railroad
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY v. DENVER & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY. DENVER & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTE FE RAILROAD COMPANY. CROSS APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STAGES POR THE
Ex parte Yarbrough
EX PARTE YARBROUGH, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. Argued January 23d, 24th, 1884. Decided March 3d, 1884. Constitutional Law — Indictment—Jurisdiction. This court has no general authority to review on error or appeal the judgments of Circuit Courts
Mitchell v. Clark
MITCHELL & Another v. CLARK. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Argued December 14th, 17th, 1883. Decided March 3d, 1884. Jurisdiction — Limitations, Statute of. When a defendant in a suit pending in a State court plead
Waples v. United States
WAPLES v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Argued January 2d, 1884. Decided March 3d, 1884. Confiscation — Deed—Judicial Sale. In a sale under the Confiscation Act, of July 17th, 1862, 12 Stat. 589, the purchaser is presumed
McDonald v. Hovey
McDONALD v. HOVEY & Another. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued January 30th and 31st, 1884. Decided March 3d, 1884. Limitations, Statute of — Statutes, Construction of. The construction usually given'to statu
Northern Bank v. Porter Township Trustees
NORTHERN BANK OF TOLEDO v. PORTER TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Argued January 21st, 1884. Decided March 3d, 1884. Estoppel — Municipal Bonds — Statutes of Ohio. The
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.