Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1885 Cases
266 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Van Weel v. Winston
VAN WEEL v. WINSTON & Others. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. Argued October 21, 22, 1885. Decided November 2, 1885. Unless transactions set forth in a bill in equity constitute a fr
Lancaster v. Collins
LANCASTER v. COLLINS. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Submitted October 23, 1885. Decided November 2, 1885. The bill of exceptions in this case contained all the evidence, and the cha
Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.
BOSTON MINING COMPANY v. EAGLE MINING COMPANY. nr ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted October 23,1885. Decided October 26, 1885. There being no assignment of error or appearance for pl
Filley v. Pope
FILLEY v. POPE & Another. IN error to the circuit court of the united states for THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued April 6, 7, 1885. Decided October 26, 1885. In a mercantile contract, a statement descriptive of the subject-matter, o
Norrington v. Wright
NORRINGTON v. WRIGHT & Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE PENNSYLVANIA. Argued January 20, 21, 1885. Decided October 26, 1885. In a mercantile contract, a statement descriptive of the subj
Lamar v. McCulloch
LAMAR, Executor, v. McCULLOCH. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued October 15,16, 1885. Decided October 26,1885. Under § 3 of the act of .July 27, 1868, eh. 276, 15 Stat. 243, now
Pennsylvania Railroad v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS, ALTON AND TERRE HAUTE RAILROAD COMPANY. ST. LOUIS, ALTON AND TERRE HAUTE RAILROAD COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF
Stone v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad
STONE & Others v. NEW ORLEANS & NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. A State statute providing that a railroad company may receive for transporting, carr
Stone v. Illinois Central Railroad
STONE & Others v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. An act of incorporation of a railway company which provides that the president and directors m
Philippi v. Philippe
PHILIPPI v. PHILIPPE & Others. APPEAL FROM. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. Argued April 23, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. Although it is true that when the relation of trustee and cestui qm trust e
Smith v. Woolfolk
SMITH & Another v. WOOLFOLK. APPEAL' FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED. STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Submitted April 9, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. In a suit in equity brought by creditors of a deceased person against his
Mayfield v. Richards
MAYFIELD v. RICHARDS & Others. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Submitted April 22, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. The act of June 11, 1864, 13 Stat. 123, “ That whenever, during the existence of the present rebellion, a
Gray v. National Steamship Co.
GRAY, Administratrix, v. NATIONAL STEAMSHIP COMPANY. ■ APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT .OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Submitted March 31, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. A, a foreign steamship corporation, went into l
Frasher v. O'Connor
GEORGE W. FRASHER & Others v. O'CONNOR. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. Argued April 10, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. In adjusting Congressional grants of lands to a State, the only questions for consideration by the
Wollensak v. Reiher
WOLLENSAK v. REIHER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Argued April 14, 15, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. The question whether delay in applying for a reissue of a patent has been reasona
Wollensak v. Reiher
WOLLENSAK v. REIHER. APPEAL EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES EOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. Argued April 14, 15, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. In view of the state of the art existing at the date of the patent granted to Joh
Clark v. Beecher Manufacturing Co.
CLARK v. BEECHER MANUFACTURING COMPANY & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Argued April 17, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. Letters patent No. 66,130, granted to James B. Clark, June 25,
The Charles Morgan
THE CHARLES MORGAN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Argued April 24,1885. Decided May 4, 1885. In case of collision on the Mississippi, if the facts show that the injured vessel made
Ehrhardt v. Hogaboom
EHRHARDT v. HOGABOOM. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. Submitted April 22, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. In an action of ejectment for lands in California, where the plaintiff traces title to the lands from a patent of
Stewart v. Dunham
STEWART & Others v. DUNHAM & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Submitted April 20, 1885 Decided May 4, 1885. When a creditor’s hill in equity is properly removed from a Stat
Crump v. Thurber
CRUMP v. THURBER. APPEAL FROM THE. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Submitted April 22, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. A-suit in equity brought by 0, a citizen of one State, against a corporation of the same Stat
Richter v. Union Trust Co.
RICHTER v. UNION TRUST COMPANY & Others. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CAUSE PENDING ON APPEAL PROM THE OIR- ' QUIT COURT OF THE' UNITED STATES FOR TEE WESTERN DISRIOT OF MICHIGAN. Submitted April 20, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. On the facts appearin
Grant v. Parker
GRANT v. PARKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued April 23, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. A syndicate, of which A and B were members, was formed to purchase a mine, and it was agreed be
Gwillim v. Donnellan
GWILLIM v. DONNELLAN & Another. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES FOR ÍHB DISTRICT' OF COLORADO. Argued April 1, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. In proceedings under -Rev. Stat. §§ 2325, 2826 to determine adverse, claims to loca
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.