Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1885 Cases
266 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New Orleans, Spanish Fort & Lake Railroad v. Delamore
NEW ORLEANS, SPANISH FORT AND LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY v. DELAMORE & Another. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Argued April 15, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. This churt has jurisdiction in error over a judgment in a suit i
Atlantic Phosphate Co. v. Grafflin
ATLANTIC PHOSPHATE COMPANY v. GRAFFLIN. IN EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Argued April 16, 17, 1885. Decided May 4, 1885. A contract was made by A., of Charleston, with D., of Baltimore,
Hopt v. Utah
HOPT v. UTAH. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COUET OF THE TERRITORY OE UTAH. Submitted January 28, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. Under tlte Utah Code of Criminal Procedure of 1878, a judgment upon a verdict of guilty of murder, the record of which
Clawson v. United States
CLAWSON v. UNITED STATES. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE UTAH. Argued April 8, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. Under § 5 oí the act of Congress of March 22, 18S2, 22 Stat. 30, which provides, ‘ ‘ that in any prosecution for
Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Co.
BURTON v. WEST JERSEY FERRY COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued April 9, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. 1 general exception to a charge, which does not direct the atten
Cavender v. Cavender
CAVENDER v. CAVENDER. APPEAL FEOM THE CIECUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued April 6, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. An answer in Chancery, setting forth material facts which should have been stated i
Pacific Bank v. Mixter
PACIFIC BANK v. MIXTER. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Submitted April 13, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. § 1001 Rev. Stat. exempts insolvent national banks or the receivers thereof, bri
District of Columbia Commissioners v. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMISSIONERS v. BALTIMORE & POTOMAC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SÜPKEME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued April 9, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. The right to use the streets of Washington for any other th
Western Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.
WESTERN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. ANSONIA BRASS & COPPER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE OIECUIT COURT OK THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OK CONNECTICUT. Argued April 2, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. The invention claimed in reissued pa
Dobson v. Hartford Carpet Co.
DOBSON & Another v. HARTFORD CARPET COMPANY. SAME v. BIGELOW CARPET COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIROUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued April 2, 1885. Decided April 20, 1885. In a sui
Dodge v. Knowles
DODGE & Another v. KNOWLES. APPEAL PROM. THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. Submitted January 9, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. Neither the liability for provisions supplied at a dwelling house where a husband and wife and their
The Laura
THE LAURA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR , THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued January 30, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. A remission by the Secretary of the Treasury, under Rey. Stat. § 5294, of penalties incu
State Bank v. United States
STATE BANK v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL- PROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. Argued April 2, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. Where, by the connivance of a clerk in the office of an assistant treasurer of the United States, a person unlawfully obtains from
Amy v. Shelby County Taxing District
AMY & Another v. SHELBY COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT & Others. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF .TENNESSEE;. Submitted January 8, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. When a person owing taxes to a municipal, corporation becomes the owner o
Aurrecoechea v. Bangs
AURRECOECHEA v. BANGS. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME OOURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. Submitted January 5, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. Lands covered by a claim under Mexican or Spanish grants, but not iound within the limits of the final surve
Penn Bank v. Furness
PENN BANK v. FURNESS & Others. APPEAL PROM THE OIECUIT CO.TJRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN BISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued March 31, April 1, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. A, B, & 0, 'being partners in business, and all believing
Walden v. Knevals
WALDEN v. KNEVALS. APPEAL FROM THE' CIROUIT COURT OE THE TOUTED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted April 1, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. ' The lands granted by Congress to the State of Kansas for the benefit of the St. Joseph &
The Belgenland
THE BELGENLAND. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. Argued January 16, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. A colli ton on tbe high seas between vessels of different nationalities is ‘prima
East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe ex dem. Visscher
EAST ALABAMA RAILWAY COMPANY v. DOE ex dem. VISSCHER. IN EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED: STATES EOE THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. Argued March 20, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. Various owners of lands in Alabama granted to a rai
Boatmen's Savings Bank v. State Savings Ass'n
BOATMEN’S SAVINGS BANK v. STATE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION. IN ERROR TO THE ST. LOUIS COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Argued April 1, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. A depositor having a balance in bank drew Ms checks upon the bank in fav
Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins
BRADSTREET COMPANY v. HIGGINS. IN ERROR TO THE CIEOUIT COUET OE THE UNITED STATES EOE THE. WESTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOUBI. Argued March 2, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. A defendant in error, on whose motion a writ of error is dismissed for wa
Doe v. Hyde
DOE v. HYDE, Assignee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT OOURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted March 31, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. D, a creditor of a bankrupt, bolding two securities therefor, after being cited in a
Weaver v. Field
WEAVER & Others v. FIELD & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Submitted January 6, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. In a suit to foreclose a mortgage on land in Louisiana, given to
Gloucester Ferry Co. v. Pennsylvania
GLOUCESTER FERRY COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued March 13, 1885. Decided April 13, 1885. Coqimerce among tie States consists of intercourse aDd traffic between their citizens, and
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.