Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co. v. Mississippi
LOUISVILLE, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. MISSISSIPPI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1195. Submitted January 10, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. ■The statute of the State of Mississippi of March 2, 1888
Gregory v. Stetson
GREGORY v. STETSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1514. Submitted January 6, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. A Circuit Court can make no decree in a suit in the absence of a party who
St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston
ST. LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY v. JOHNSTON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 41. Argued Decembr 19, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. A customary depositor in a bank in Ne
Searl v. School District No. 2
SEARL v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 IN LAKE COUNTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 1104. Submitted January 10, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. A tract of land in Leadville, Colorado, was deemed by
Sturr v. Beck
STURR v. BECK. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. No. 1172. Submitted Decembert 9, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. No judgment or decree of the highest court of a Territory can be reviewed in this court in matter of fact
Fogg v. Blair
FOGG v. BLAIR. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 188. Argued January 24, 27, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. A liquidated claim against a-railroad company, not converted into a judgmen
Lincoln County v. Luning
LINCOLN COUNTY v. LUNING. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA. No. 1274. Submitted January 13, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution does not operate to prevent counti
Bernards Township v. Morrison
BERNARDS TOWNSHIP v. MORRISON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 195. Argued January 30, 31, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. 1 tbe questions presented and argued in this case have been often co
Burthe v. Denis
BURTHE v. DENIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 1381. Submitted January 13, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. The property of a subject of the Emperor of the French in Louisiana was occupied by the army of the United S
Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price County
WISCONSIN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. PRICE COUNTY ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 76. Argued and submitted November 6, 7, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. No State has power to tax the property of the United States wi
Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.
DELAWARE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. DIEBOLD SAFE AND LOCK COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 39. Submitted April 26, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. Under tbé act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, th
Gage. v. Kaufman
GAGE. v. KAUFMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 189. Submitted January 27, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. In a bill in equity to quiet title, an allegation that the plaintiff is
Armstrong v. American Exchange National Bank
ARMSTRONG v. AMERICAN EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 1110, 1111. Submitted January 13, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. On June 14, 18
Mills v. Dow's Administrator
MILLS v. DOW’S ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 151. Submitted December 9, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. Where tbe subject matter of a contract relates to the construction
California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.
CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNION COMPRESS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 1051. Submitted October 30, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. The defendant, a Are insurance compan
Hopkins v. McLure
HOPKINS v. McLURE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 126. Argued November 20, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. Where the Supreme Court of a State decides against the plaintiff in error on an independent ground, not
Quebec Steamship Co. v. Merchant
QUEBEC STEAMSHIP CO. v. MERCHANT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 30. Argued January 24, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. The stewardess of a steam-vessel belonging to a corporation sue
Coyne v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
COYNE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 8. Argued and submitted January 23, 24, 1890. Decided March 3, 1890. In this case, which was an action against a railroad c
Phœnix Caster Co. v. Spiegel
PHŒNIX CASTER COMPANY v. SPIEGEL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 150. Argued December 10, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. The claim of letters patent No. 190,152, granted May 1, 1877, to Ale
Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union
IRWIN v. SAN FRANCISCO SAVINGS UNION. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 181. Submitted January 23, 1890. — Decided February 3, 1890. Wright v. Roseberry, 121 U. S. 488, affirmed and
Burt v. Evory
BURT v. EVORY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 164. Argued December 16, 1889. Decided February 3, 1890. The claim in letters patent No. 59,375, granted to Alexander F. EVory and Alon
Davis v. Beason
DAVIS v. BEASON. APPEAL FROM THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF IDAHO. No. 1261. Argued December 9, 10, 1889. Decided February 3, 1890. The provision in § 601, Rev. Stats. Idaho, that “ no person who is a bigamist or poly
Buford v. Houtz
BUFORD v. HOUTZ. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 711. Submitted January 6, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. There is an implied license, growing out of the custom of nearly one hundred years, that the public lands
Smith v. Lyon
SMITH v. LYON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 1164. Submitted January 6, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. Under the act of March 3, 1887, 24 Stat. 552, c. .373, as amended by the act
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.