Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Corbin v. Gould
CORBIN v. GOULD. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 131. Argued November 22, 1889. Decided February 3, 1890. The trade-mark, for tea (No, 9952) registered in the Patent Office by Ing
Street v. United States
STREET v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 1123. Submitted January 10, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. It was the purpose of Congress by the 12th and 13th sections' of the army-appropriation act of July 15, 1870,16 Stat.
Adams v. Crittenden
ADAMS v. CRITTENDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 952. Submitted January 13, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. A person in failing' circumstances convéyed away his equity of redempt
Beals v. Illinois, Missouri & Texas Railroad
BEALS v. ILLINOIS, MISSOURI AND TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 111. Argued January 16, 17, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. Á decree in equity, cancelling b
United States v. Mosby
UNITED STATES v. MOSBY. MOSBY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 1112, 1420. Argued January 17, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. question considered, as to what are “official services ” performed by consuls, under the c
Geofroy v. Riggs
GEOFROY v. RIGGS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1431. Submitted December 23, 1889. Decided February 3, 1890. A citizen of France can take land in the District of Columbia by descent from a citizen- of the Un
Geilinger v. Philippi
GEILINGER v. PHILIPPI. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 367. Submitted January 8, 1890. Decided February 3, 1890. An insolvent debtor of Louisiana, under tlie insolvent laws of that
Christian v. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad
CHRISTIAN v. ATLANTIC AND NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 46. Argued October 30, 1889. Decided January 27, 1890. A State is an indispensable
Coulam v. Doull
COULAM v. DOULL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 124. Submitted November 18, 1889. Decided January 27, 1890. Under the statute of Utah, enacting that when a testator omits to provide in his will for any of his ch
United States v. Waters
UNITED STATES v. WATERS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 95. Submitted November 11, 1889. Decided January 27, 1890. Thé amount of counsel-fee to be allowed to a district attorney, under Key. Stat. § 824, for trial before a jury óf. a p
Comanche County v. Lewis
COMANCHE COUNTY v. LEWIS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 1022. Submitted January 7, 1890. Decided January 27, 1890. JTull control over the matter of the organization of new counties in the St
United States v. Hancock
UNITED STATES v. HANCOCK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 688. Submitted January 8, 1890. Decided January 27, 1890. When a decree in equity in a suit relating to public land gi
Manning v. French
MANNING v. FRENCH. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1188. Submitted January 13, 1890. Decided January 27, 1890. In an action' brought in a state court against the judges of the Court of Commissioners of the Ala
Wallace v. United States
WALLACE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 855. Submitted January 10, 1890. Decided January 27, 1890. An envoy extraordinary arid minister plenipotentiary of the United. States to Turkey was never appointed before July 1
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Galesburg
FARMERS’ LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. GALESBURG. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 887. Submitted January 9, 1890. Decided January 27, 1890. The city of Galesburg, Illinois, by an ord
Knox County v. Harshman
KNOX COUNTY v. HARSHMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 1212. Submitted January 10, 1890. Decided January 27, 1890. A court of equity does not interfere with judgments at law, un
Cole v. Cunningham
COLE v. CUNNINGHAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 74. Submitted November 6, 1889. Decided January 20, 1890. The Constitution of the Unit eel States, in proper cases, permits equity-courts of one Stat
Illinois Central Railroad v. Bosworth
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOSWORTH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 79. Argued November 11, 12, 1889. Decided January 20, 1890. A condemnation under the confiscation- act
Ohio Central Railroad v. Central Trust Co.
OHIO CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 1288. Submitted December 23, 1889. Decided January 20, 1890. A hill in equity for
Stuart v. Boulware
STUART v. BOULWARE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 1495. Submitted January 6, 1890. Decided January 20, 1890. An allowance of counsel fees on behalf of a receiver is made to the rec
Schrader v. Manufacturers' National Bank
SCHRADER v. MANUFACTURERS’ NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1370. Submitted January 9, 1890. Decided January 20, 1890. A national bank went into voluntar
San Francisco City v. Itsell
SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY v. ITSELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1506. Submitted January 8, 1890. Decided January 20, 1890. This court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment of the highest court of a Sta
United States v. Stowell
UNITED STATES v. STOWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 167. Submitted December 2, 1889. Decided January 20, 1890. Statutes to prevent frauds upon the revenue, although they impose pe
Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.
MASON v. PEWABIC MINING COMPANY. PEWABIC MINING COMPANY v. MASON. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Nos. 168, 240. Argued December 17, 18, 1889. Decided January 13, 1890. On the dissol
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.