Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Richardson's Executor v. Green
RICHARDSON’S EXECUTOR v. GREEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 19. Argued October 17, 18, 1889. Decided January 13, 1890. While the relations of a party towards a corporation, as
Hill v. Wooster
HILL v. WOOSTER. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP VERMONT. No. 10. Argued November 19, 20,1889. Decided January 13, 1890. In a suit in equity, brought under §.4915 of the Revised Statutes, in a Circuit
Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. Tolson
INLAND AND SEABOARD COASTING COMPANY v. TOLSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 532. Submitted December 23, 1889. — .DecidedJanuary 6, 1890. Át a-special term of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia a ju
Keyser v. Hitz
KEYSER v. HITZ. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT Of COLUMBIA. No. 42. Argued October 25, 28, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. After the passage of the act of June 30, 1876, 19 Stat.- 63, savings banks organized in the District of Co
Case v. Kelly
CASE v. KELLY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 2. Argued January 26, 1888. Decided January 6, 1890. In tlie absence of an enabling statute, either general or special, a railroad
Miller v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
MILLER v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. WORRALL v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. DUNLAP v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. Nos. 737, 867, 8
United States v. Carr
UNITED STATES v. CARR. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. . No. 411. Submitted December 3,.1889. Decided January 6, 1890. When a sum of money has been voluntarily paid by the United States to a mail contractor, by mistake of fact, or under ci
Jack v. Utah Territory
JACK v. UTAH TERRITORY. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP UTAH. No. 144. Argued December 5, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. Clayton v. Utah, ante, 632, affirmed and applied to this ease. The case is stated in the opinion. Mr.
Clayton v. Utah Territory
CLAYTON v. UTAH TERRITORY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 143. Argued December 5, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. This court has jurisdiction to hear and determine,, irrespective of the amount involved, an appeal
Patrick v. Graham
PATRICK v. GRAHAM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OB' THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 152. Argued December 10, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. Where a case has gone to a hearing, testimony been submitted to the jury-under obj
Robertson v. Edelhoff
ROBERTSON v. EDELHOFF. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW TORE. No. 170. Avgued December 19, 20, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. Bibbons, composed of silk and cotton, in which, silk is the compon
Cleary v. Ellis Foundry Co.
CLEARY v. ELLIS FOUNDRY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 'FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 160. Argued December 13, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. Avery v. Cleary,’’ante, 604, affirmed; but as the defendant did
Avery v. Cleary
AVERY v. CLEARY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 162. Argued December 13, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. On the facts, as stated in the opinion of the court, it is held, that this suit
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Wangelin
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WANGELIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. . No. 169. ' Submitted December 19, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. Under the act of March 3, 1875,
Richmond v. Blake
RICHMOND v. BLAKE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW- YORK. No. 171. Argued December 20, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. ' The plaintiff had a place of business, indicated’ by a sign Over the do
Graves v. Corbin
GRAVES v. CORBIN. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO v. CORBIN. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES .FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 155, 980. Argued December 10,12, 13,1889. Decided January 6, 1890. A bill in equity
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.