Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1892 Cases
260 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Commissioners
YESLER v. WASHINGTON HARBOR LINE COMMISSIONERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT Off THE STATE Off WASHINGTON. No. 912. Argued October 24, 25, 1892. Decided December 19, 1892. An allegation — in a petition to a state court for a.writ of prohibiti
Lloyd v. Preston
LLOYD v. PRESTON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 59. Argued November 29, 80,1892. Decided December 19, 1892. In 1881, H., a citizen of Ohio, through P., M. and others of Chicago, sp
Means v. Bank of Randall
MEANS v. BANK OF RANDALL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE KANSAS. No. 63. Submitted December 2,1892. Decided December 19, 1892. Ii. desiring to purchase cattle from P., a bank paid the purchase money for
Brown v. Baxter
BROWN v. BAXTER. EBEOB TO THE COURT OF APPEALS'OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 1123. Submitted December 12, 1892. Decided December 19, 1892. A writ of error to tbe Court of Appeals of a State, to review a judgment of •that court dismissing an
McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.
McGOURKEY v. TOLEDO AND OHIO CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL EROM THÉ CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE OHIO. No. 35. Argued November 4, 1892. Decided December 19, 1892. On the 2d of April, 1884, St. filed a pe
Cameron v. United States
CAMERON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME' COURT OE THE TERRITORY QE ARIZONA; No. 42. Argued November 14,15,189?. Decided December 19, 1892. The writ of error in this case is dismissed because itvdóes not appear, that the jurisdicti
Royer v. Coupe
ROYER v. COUPE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ’ THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 82. Argued December 7, 8, 1892. Decided December 19, 1892. 'The claim of letters patent. No. 149,954, granted April 21, 1874, to Her
National Tube Works Co. v. Ballou
NATIONAL TUBE WORKS COMPANY v. BALLOU. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 70. Argued December 2, 1892. Decided December 19, 1892. A Massachusetts corporation brought a suit in equit
Potts v. Wallace
POTTS v. WALLACE. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ■ No. 41. Argued November 14,1892. Decided December 12, 1892. The directors of a corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania vo
Huntington v. Attrill
HUNTINGTON v. ATTRILL. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 33. Argued April 26, 1892. Decided December 12, 1892. A bill in equity in one State to set aside a conveyance of property made in fraud of creditors, aiyl to
United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.
UNITED STATES v. COLTON MARBLE AND LIME COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA. Nos. 862,863, Argued November 9, 10,1892. Deci
United States v. Southern Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP CALIFORNIA. Nos. 921, 922. Argued November 9, 10, 1892.
Brinkerhoff v. Aloe
BRINKERHOFF v. ALOE. APPEAL PROM THE QIRCUIT • COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 85. Argued December 9, 1892. Decided December 12, 1892. ‘Letters patent No. 224,991, granted to Alexander W. Brinkerhoff, Ma
Mitchell v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
MITCHELL v. NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 71. Argued December 6,1892. Decided December 12, 1892. A direction of the Circuit Court
Scott v. Armstrong
SCOTT v. ARMSTRONG. FARMERS’ AND MERCHANTS’ STATE BANK v. ARMSTRONG. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE - UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 53, 10
Compania Bilbaina de Navegacion v. Spanish-American Light & Power Co.
COMPANIA BILBAINA DE NAVEGACION, DE BILBAO v. SPANISH-AMERICAN LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 66. Argued December 1, 2,1892. Decided December 12, 1892.
Derby v. Thompson
DERBY v. THOMPSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR . THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 40. Argued November II, 14, 1892. Decided December 12, 1892. The article claimed to be protected under the second claim in letter
United States v. Dunnington
UNITED STATES v. DUNNINGTON. DUNNINGTON v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE COURT'OP CLAIMS.' Nos. 51, 52. Argued November 18, 1892. Decided December 8, 1892. The estate forfeited by proceedings to judgment under the confiscation act of July
Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. ILLINOIS. CHICAGO v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. ILLINOIS v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT. OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 419
Lewis v. United States
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT- OF ARKANSAS. No. 1018. Argued October 28, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. Iu trials for. felonies, it is not in the power of the prisoner, eit
Balloch v. Hooper
BALLOCH v. HOOPER APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 21. Argued November 7, 8, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. On the facts in this case detailed in the opinion it is Held, (1) That the deed from Balloch to Hoope
McMullen v. United States
McMULLEN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 55. Submitted November 22, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. For the purpose of determining the amount of compensation to be paid to a marshal of the United States for attending
In re Engles
In re ENGLES, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No number. Submitted November 28, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. On the authority of In re Fassett, 142 TJ. S. 479, the court refuses to grant a writ of prohibition to restrain the District Court of the
Joy v. Adelbert College
JOY v. ADELBERT COLLEGE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 1014. Submitted November 28, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. This court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a judgment of a
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.