Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1892 Cases
260 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Schoverling
UNITED STATES v. SCHOVERLING. APPEAL FROM 'THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES .FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 690. Argued October 25, 1892, Decided November 7, 1892, In the latter part of October, 1890, the firm of S., D. &
United States v. Perry
UNITED STATES v. PERRY. APPEAL' FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 794. Argued October 26, 28, 1892. Decided November 7, 1892. Paintings upon glass, consisting of pieces of variously color
Earnshaw v. United States
EARNSHAW v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 4. Argued October 17, 1892. Decided November 7, 1892. A reappraisement of imported merchandise under the provisions of
Hubbard v. Soby
HUBBARD v. SOBY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE CONNECTICUT. No. 1094. Submitted October 17, 1892. Decided October 31, 1892. This court has no jurisdiction over a writ of error sued out June 11, 1892, fr
Cincinnati Safe & Lock Co. v. Grand Rapids Safety Deposit Co.
CINCINNATI SAFE AND LOCK COMPANY v. GRAND RAPIDS SAFETY DEPOSIT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 872. Submitted October 17, 1892. Decided October 31, 1892. The judgment in the c
Van Winkle v. Crowell
VAN WINKLE v. CROWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE’ UNITED .STATES FOR THE ' MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 23. Argued and submitted, March 30, 1892. Decided October 31, 1892. By a contract in writing V. agreed to make for B. certain
McPherson v. Blacker
McPHERSON v. BLACKER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 1170. Argued Oct. 11, 1892. Decided Oct. 17, 1892. The validity of a state law providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having b
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart
Union Pacific Railway Company v. Taggart. Error the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. No. 212. Argued with 211.
States v. Humphries & Mock
No. 235, United States v. Humphries and Mock. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. Submitted April 21, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893-Brewer, J.: This case is so nearly like the case just decid
In re Riser
In re Riser, Petitioner, In re Tyler, Petitioner, In re Gaines, Petitioner, No. 16, No. 18, No. 19, Original: Original: Original. These cases were all argued with In re Tyler. . See ante, pages 172 to 180.
United States v. Dalles Military Road Co.
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No. 1159, argued with No. 1073. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Parker for appellants. Mr. James K. Kelly fbr appell
Keels v. Central Railroad
Keels v. Central Railroad Company. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina. No. 1207. Argued with No. 1206.
Meehan v. Valentine
MEEHAN v. VALENTINE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE’ EASTERN DISTRICT OF FENNSYLVANIA. No. 12. Argued November 11, 12, 1890. Decided May 16, 1892. One who' lends a sum of money to a partnership under an agreement th
Meagher v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.
MEAGHER v. MINNESOTA THRESHER MANUFACTURING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 1545. Submitted May 2, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. A judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota overruling a demurre
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cox
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. COX. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT 'OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 327. Argued April 22, 1892. Deeided May 16, 1892. The proviso In § 6 of the.act of March3, 1887, 24 Stat. 352,
Oteri v. Scalzo
OTERI v. SCALZO. APPEAL FROM THE ' CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. ' No. 166. Argued April 8, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. A bill in equity set forth the making of a partnership between the plaintiff
Cross v. United States
CROSS v. UNITED STATES. error to the supreme court of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1525. Submitted April 25, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Under the act of February 6,1889, “ to provide for writs of error in capital cases,” 25 Stat.-655, c.
Rossman v. Hedden
ROSSMAN v. HEDDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF 'NEW YORK. No. 332. Argued April 25, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Plain glazed and plain enamelled tiles, imported in February, May and June, 188
Jenkins v. Collard
JENKINS v. COLLARD. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 316. Submitted April 18, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Although, under the ruling in Wallach v. Van SyswicJc, 92 TT. S. 207, the defend
Bardon v. Northern Pacific Railroad
BARDON v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WISCONSIN. No. 343. Argued April 27, 28, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Land which, at the time of the grant of July 2,
Telfener v. Russ
TELFENER v. RUSS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 329. Argued April 22, 25, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Under the laws of Texas, for the purchase of a portion of its unappropriated land
Nebraska v. Iowa
NEBRASKA v. IOWA. ORIGINAL. No. 4. Original. Argued January 29, 1892. Decree entered May 16, 1892. This case was decided February .29, 1892, 143 U. S. 359, and the decree withheld in order to enable the parties to agree to the designation o
Dowling v. Exchange Bank
DOWLING v. EXCHANGE BANK OF BOSTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 349. Argued April 29, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. An agreement of partnership between three partners for carrying
Glenn v. Marbury
GLENN v. MARBURY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1231. Submitte anuary 11, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The statute of limitations begins to run against an action against a stockholder in an insolvent corporation
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.