Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1892 Cases
260 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Osborne
CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. OSBORNE. SAME v. JUNOD. ORIGINAL. Nos. 1238, 1239. Submitted November 21, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. In each of these cases defendant in error sued plaintiff in error under the Interstate Co
Benson v. United States
BENSON v. UNITED STATES. .ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 1007. Argued October 28, 31, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. The Constitution permits a State to cede to the United States jurisdictio
Butler v. Goreley
BUTLER v. GORELEY. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE. OE MASSACHUSETTS. No. 20. Argued November 21, 22, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. One T., of Boston, went into insolvency in Massachusetts, in June, 1883, and a deed of assignment
Wilmington & Weldon Railroad v. Alsbrook
WILMINGTON AND WELDON RAILROAD COMPANY v. ALSBROOK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1074. Argued November 17, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. The general rule that a valid grant to a corporation, by a statute
In re Cross
In re CROSS, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 10 Original. Submitted November 29, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. The provision in section 845 of the Revised Statutes of the District of Columbia that when the judgment in a criminal case is death o
Hallinger v. Davis
HALLINGER v. DAVIS. APPEAL FROM THE' CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 1100. Submitted November 7, 1892. Decided November 28, 1892. A state statute, conferring upon one charged with crime the right to wa
Toplitz v. Hedden
TOPLITZ v. HEDDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. No. 45. Argued November 16, 1892. Decided November 28, 1892. Imported articles, used as head-coverings for men, invoiced as “ Scotch b
Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National Bank
THOMPSON v. SAINT NICHOLAS NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 49. Argued November 17, 18, 1892. Decided November 28, 1892. Where T. deposited with C., his broker, coupon railroad mortgage bonds, as ma
Junge v. Hedden
JUNGE v. HEDDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 44. Argued November 15, 16, 1892. Decided November 28, 1892. In construing tariff acts an article may be held to be enumerated, alth
Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton City
HAMILTON GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY v. HAMILTON CITY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 32. Argued November 2, 3, 1892. Decided November 21, 1892. The provision in sec. 2486 of the Rev
Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. District of Columbia
WASHINGTON AND GEORGETOWN RAILROAD COMPANY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL EBOM THE SUPREME COUBT OE THE’DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. No. 27. Argued and submitted November 10, 11, 1892. Decided November 21, 1892. With certain exceptions, within wh
Root v. Third Avenue Railroad
ROOT v. THIRD AVENUE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 39. Argued November 7, 1892. Decided November 21, 1892. an inventor applied, September 3d, 1881, for letter
Southern Pacific Co. v. Denton
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. DENTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 403. Submitted November 7, 1892. Decided November 21, 1892. Under the act of March 3,1887, c. 373, § 1, as corrected
Stotesbury v. United States
STOTESBURY v. UNITED STATES. •APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 30. Argued November 11, 1892 Decided November 21, 1892. A decision by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on an application for the refunding of' taxes collected, authorizi
Cook v. Hart
COOK v. HART. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ■ THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 1067. Argued October 31, November 1, 1892. Decided November 21, 1892. Ker v. Illinois, 119 U. S. 436, and Mahon v. Justice, 127 U.
Hardee v. Wilson
HARDEE v. WILSON. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT' COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA. No. 34. Argued November 3, 1892. Decided November 21, 1892. Where a decree in equity is a joint one against all the defendants, all
Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
MORLEY v. LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OR APPEALS OR THE STATE OR NEW YORK. No. 1. Argued October 14, 17, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. The Court of Appeals of the State of New York having held tha
Mattox v. United States
CLYDE MATTOX v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 1008. Submitted October 31, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. ■When the trial court excludes affidavits offered in support of a m
San Pedro & Cañon Del Agua Co. v. United States
SAN PEDRO AND CAÑON DEL AGUA COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 7. Argued October 17, 24, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. Idaho & Oregon Land Co. v.'Sradbttry, 132 TJ. S. 509, affirm
Bellaire v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
BELLAIRE v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. error to the circuit court oe the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 38. Submitted November 4, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. The petition of a city in a state court, agai
Ware v. Galveston City Co.
WARE v. GALVESTON CITY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 28. Submitted November 1, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. The doctrine of laches applied to a suit in equity, the bil
Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railroad
FOSTER v. MANSFIELD, COLDWATER AND LAKE MICHIGAN RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 25. Argued and submitted November 2, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. If a bill to
Cross v. Burke
CROSS v. BURKE. APPEAL' FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1105. Argued November 1, 1892. Decided November 14, 1892. This court has no jurisdiction over judgments of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia on habe
Roby v. Colehour
ROBY v. COLEHOUR AND ANOTHER. ROBY v. COLEHOUR. ROBY v. COLEHOUR AND ANOTHER. ROBY v. COLEHOUR AND ANOTHER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OR ILLINOIS. Nos. 990, 987, 988, 989. Submitted May 2, 1892. Decided November 7, 1892. In er
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.